dounavilla Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 4 minutes ago, hippo said: Morgan Rogers who ? (can we watch ?) I think it's this guy . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post TheStagMan Posted July 30, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 30, 2021 (edited) 11 minutes ago, It's Your Round said: https://twitter.com/City_Xtra/status/1421094360561692679?s=20 City Xtra (@City_Xtra) Tweeted: #ManCity have offered £90M plus Morgan Rogers (19) - valued at £10M - for Jack Grealish. Rogers would be open to a move to Villa Park, and is also wanted by Crystal Palace. [via @RobDawsonESPN] I can’t copy Tweets, clearly! But who dafuq is Morgan Rogers? Tell you what then, Sell Morgan Rogers for £10M to Palace, then when you have the £100m, call us back.... .. and we will still tell you to **** off. Seriously?????? They want to offload a 19 year old we have never heard of onto us for £10m. If that is true, it is great news because it gives NSWE even more reason to laugh and put the phone down. Edited July 30, 2021 by TheStagMan Pewer Grammmarrrz 5 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhan_Zhuang Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 Every time we look like improving along comes a team like Man Poo or Citeh to derail us. Maybe the future will be brighter without Grealish but it hurts especially after all his talk about being a Villa fan and loyalty. But, perhaps I'm jumping the gun, perhaps he'll stay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadridVilla Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 4 minutes ago, It's Your Round said: https://twitter.com/City_Xtra/status/1421094360561692679?s=20 City Xtra (@City_Xtra) Tweeted: #ManCity have offered £90M plus Morgan Rogers (19) - valued at £10M - for Jack Grealish. Rogers would be open to a move to Villa Park, and is also wanted by Crystal Palace. [via @RobDawsonESPN] I can’t copy Tweets, clearly! But who dafuq is Morgan Rogers? We won't accept that, not enough e's in the club shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 City are negotiating in bad faith. It’s an insult to Jack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 Some of these posts suggesting Grealish is just another mercenary will not age well at all once he's signed improved terms with Villa. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hippo Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 Ex West Brom - so would be know to our coaching staff. Im feeling better already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante_Lockhart Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 8 minutes ago, VillaFaninLondon said: It’s apparently £90m + Morgan Rogers (who?). What an insulting offer, not even all up front. Shoild be rejected outright. Slight improvement on 3m and Onomah 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnyp Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, DCJonah said: Percy is as trusted as it gets. And if a bid has gone in then guaranteed Jack and his agent have said they're open to a move. Now the question is do we ask for more? Refuse any bid? And does Jack accept that or kick up a fuss? I'll reiterate that ego is a dangerous thing in a dressing room and can infect a place very quickly. We can say " Grealish isn't like that " If he really wants to move, we reject the move, and essentially make him stay, you don't know what you are potentially doing to that dressing room. If they meet the price, he wants to move, sell. Edited July 30, 2021 by Johnnyp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mazrim Posted July 30, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 30, 2021 1 minute ago, dounavilla said: I think it's this guy . Man City have biddy biddy biddy. 2 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dounavilla Posted July 30, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 30, 2021 I'd just like to take this opportunity while all this madness is happening to say that .... I fruggin hate Man city and Thier filthy rich owners and their plastic fans. Thank you 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villan501 Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 90mil + Morgan Rogers is not in anyway a good deal for villa. You would not offer a potential gem as player exchange so it would appear they have over inflated Morgan value. It's insulting to our club and our fans. offer proper money or shut the door on your way out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hippo Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 Just now, maqroll said: Some of these posts suggesting Grealish is just another mercenary will not age well at all once he's signed improved terms with Villa. #irony ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKP90 Posted July 30, 2021 VT Supporter Share Posted July 30, 2021 Just now, TheStagMan said: Tell you what then, Sell Morgan Rogers for £10M to Palace, then when you have the £100m, call us back... Haha, yeah. Just sounds like someone trying to negotiate for no reason. Let’s face it, if you can afford 90 million, you can afford 100 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillanousOne Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 4 minutes ago, hippo said: Not sure I could stand 2 Morgans ! we could sign the best Morgan, he's not under contract he's a Freeman thank you folks, available for funerals and very sad transfer news days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulC Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 2 minutes ago, PieFacE said: This £90m + Morgan deal should have been rejected already. Hopefully. Why would we want one of their 19 year olds when we have the best crop of players of that age group in the country 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villanmac Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 The last part exchange deal we did with City went well.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRO Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 12 minutes ago, jacketspuds said: Ivan Stearland? Is Stephen Ireland still there, for such occasions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 4 minutes ago, MaVilla said: thing is, i can see a scenario where selling Jack for 120m would actually be beneficial for the team. thats IF, we spent the full 120m on 3-4 very very good players, plus the 80m we were already gonna spend, ie: a full 200m. I was wondering this morning. Hypothetically Jack goes for £100m, will we spend that plus any money already earmarked for this window? If we don’t do we start to question the ambition of NSWE? They make bold claims of getting to the CL but the odd £30m signing won’t get us there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rightdm00 Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 5 minutes ago, MaVilla said: thing is, i can see a scenario where selling Jack for 120m would actually be beneficial for the team. thats IF, we spent the full 120m on 3-4 very very good players, plus the 80m we were already gonna spend, ie: a full 200m. BUT, those players we bought for 200m, would need to be top keck and actually take us to the next level without Grealish. It could be done, but the recruitment team would 100% have to ensure they had their weetabix, and NWSE would have to show their cahoona's by reinvesting every penny. the risk is we have 200m to spend, and spunk it on trash, im more confident now than at any time in the last 20 years that we have the right recruitment team....but you just....can never be 100% sure. (especially with our transfer istory over the last decade). Obviously i would prefer to keep jack, but gotta be realistic also, i mean...Leicester managed it......maybe we could too. Selling him 15 days before the season starts, with numerous players to bring in if it happens, is super risky. If we get £120 million in hard currency, not player swaps or hard to achieve clauses then it will absolutely propell us forward. Everyone except for the most elite clubs are in the end selling clubs. Sucks but that's the way it is. The goal should be to use that money to always propell us forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts