Jump to content

HKP90

VT Supporter
  • Posts

    7,089
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

HKP90 last won the day on February 8

HKP90 had the most liked content!

About HKP90

Profile Information

  • Location
    Cleobury, Shropshire

Recent Profile Visitors

3,103 profile views

HKP90's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Very Popular
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine
  • First Post

Recent Badges

5.3k

Reputation

  1. I'm gonna put some money on Zaniolo to score.
  2. Ollie has some of the best stats in Europe. Yeah it's nothing to do with how he's used. Obvs. Toney is better innit. Geez.
  3. Yes. Probably a bit soon. Buggers watch me fall slowly into their crosshairs.
  4. Well I've just got the free version at the moment, and the only option is Warzone. There is some falling from the sky stuff that I have not seen before. The first time I did that I was killed the instant I touched the ground. The maps are huge, the squads small and if you get killed it seems like you are out for the round. As a Deathmatch guy on WWII it's just a bit confusing. I think I just need practice.
  5. Just trying to make the switch from CoD WWII, which I have played extensively, to MW3, as I have a friend who has it. So far it's been pretty impenetrable, but I will persist.
  6. Spurs increased revenue by moving by 7%, and it cost them a billion pounds to do it. Another example- West Ham. West Ham made £26M from matchday during the last year at the boleyn. Three years afterward they made the same at London Stadium, plus or minus. This last year (because of European competition) they made £47M. They have increased overall revenue by moving, again, by around 7% per year. In their case I guess it makes sense because they didn't burden themselves with a billion squids of debt as it was already built. But still, just 7%.
  7. I keep seeing these terms, bright future, ambition. It would not make us very much money, and the atmosphere would be worse, as discussed in previous posts. What, then, would we actually be doing it for? Specifically.
  8. 127 years at Villa Park and I'm looking at the short term. Look, my argument is that financially it will make limited difference, and for that we're giving up 127 years of history. I've provided justification for that. You don't agree, fine. Make your case and provide justification that we're going to be financially much better off and I'll listen. Or even take my argument apart. That's fine. But don't come disparaging me as a short termer and waltz off.
  9. That's a fair point. Edit- Although we'd not be getting any equity in the business from the finished stadium, so there's that.
  10. How much would the new stadium cost? Assuming a billion like spurs we'd not see any profit at all from it's construction for 20 years. In that time our (current shitty) broadcast revenue would have earned the same value three times over. We're way behind in terms of broadcast revenue, and ancillaries. We upgrade those and that extra £50M would be like chump change. Or we could just sell our heritage for no significant gain.
  11. Their revenue is £540M per year. Deloitte actually has their matchday revenue at £135M, up from £92.5M during the last year at white hart lane. That's a gain of £42M/year, or an increase of 7%. Their stadium cost £1B to build. With the increased revenue it will have paid for itself by 2048. Then they can start raking in the big bucks. It's worth pointing out that they made £100M from broadcast rights this year, and £276M during their last season at WHL.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â