Jump to content

The RJW63 Official Jack Grealish Appreciation Thread


kevangrealish

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, JONESYVILLA said:

You and £200m, he's not even £100m but Man City are likely daft enough to pay it.

How is he "not even £100m", especially if someone's just bid £100m? 

An asset is worth whatever someone will pay for it, or sell it for. There's no objective value.

Edited by blunther
took out unnecessary abuse
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Okonokos said:

Not when the player they're bidding for is worth twice that.

This is just money, were losing a player who makes things happen for us, it's not worth it if we can't bring a replacement in.

We lose Jack then we lose any competitive edge for a while and that's to ask the question if we can get it back by spending that money on a suitable replacement.

NSWE won't let Jack go they can't afford to if we're to keep on moving on up.

Edited by Dave-R
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, StanBalaban said:

Anyone got a subscription to the article?

Manchester City have made a £100million offer for Jack Grealish, as Pep Guardiola moves to complete the most expensive transfer in Premier League history.

Champions City have finally tabled a huge bid for the England international which they hope will persuade Aston Villa to agree a deal, in the biggest move of this summer's transfer window so far.

Grealish has been one of Guardiola's priority signings this summer and, after days of discussions, City have submitted a remarkable offer which will eclipse English football's previous transfer record of £89 million for Paul Pogba.

The 25-year-old is set to return for training with Villa on Monday next week, after taking a break following England's involvement with Euro 2020, but City are hopeful of striking an agreement over the next few days.

Villa have offered Grealish a new contract which will vastly improve his current terms of around £125,000 a week and have based their summer transfer activity on keeping their talismanic captain.

But with City experiencing frustration in their attempts to sign Tottenham's Harry Kane, Grealish has now emerged as their No. 1 target.

Manchester City, Aston Villa and the player’s agent were contacted but declined to comment.

More to follow.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JONESYVILLA said:

You and £200m, he's not even £100m but Man City are likely daft enough to pay it.

Nothing wrong with other clubs fans coming on here but when they're posing as Villa fans then surely that's against VT rules?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Phil Silvers said:

One thing to consider lads is that this is exactly the same scenario as ESR and look what happened there. Don't panic. 

Yeah I think same.

I seen one article state it was man utd talking to Jack lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack is a footballer first and a Villa fan second...

Manchester City is a wonderful opportunity for him to play at the highest level and he turns 26 next year.

Let’s not kid ourselves

 

7 minutes ago, The_Steve said:

Why? There’s no clause and no reason to accept it. 

 

7 minutes ago, Don_Simon said:

Why?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JONESYVILLA said:

You and £200m, he's not even £100m but Man City are likely daft enough to pay it.

Well, sorry to break it to you but any player is worth what the selling club says he is. Simples.

Now please stop breaking VillaTalk rules. How do we report users?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always have to reject the first offer but if they go higher you have to listen.  When offers get this high the selling club almost always comes out on top. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Phil Silvers said:

One thing to consider lads is that this is exactly the same scenario as ESR and look what happened there. Don't panic. 

It’s different in so many ways 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â