Jump to content

Richard O’Kelly


alreadyexists

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Peter Griffin said:

I really don't think ROK leaving opens too many questions. From the information available it is simply that the club didn't believe he was the right person for the job and he is no longer in the position. That is how well managed successful companies operate. This is positive news for AVFC

Agreed if it's Deans decision. If somebody else is calling those same decisions and taking it out if Deans hands it's a different thing for me.

It may well still be the right call, but it does change the context

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hippo said:

Agree. I'm a bit old school though. The head coach chooses his coaching staff. Can't be sure of course but it's hard to believe this was DSs  decision alone.

I would agree that the head coach should appoint the coaches but they also must fit into the style of football determined by the DoF as his role is to mandate this. If DS was against ROK leaving then I would say his position was untenable and he would have left too. I expect that DS 'agreed' to ROK leaving. I think it is becoming clear that DS will be under a lot of pressure to deliver next season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah strange one for me aswell.

Can understand Terry leaving as he's on a different path and dosen't have the same attachment to Dean but O'Kelly nearly 60, last was manager at Hereford in 2012 and worked with Dean since at Walsall and Brentford.

Interesting one, expecting an Athletic piece in next few days.

We've gone from having a very strong backroom team to just now Shakey and Cutler also offering advice so need to get some fresh voices in a.s.a.p.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, HalfTimePost said:

Agreed if it's Deans decision. If somebody else is calling those same decisions and taking it out if Deans hands it's a different thing for me.

It may well still be the right call, but it does change the context

Bang on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terry imo was there for the cameras as much as his coaching insight … Stature within the game as a great CB aside not sure what we will miss and I read somewhere that there would be further restructuring of the coaching department post Terry…Be interesting what effect ROK will have … 

And  I’m sure it’s just a honourable I’ll do pre - season then I’m afraid guv I’m done for whatever reason… Good luck & Health  ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SuperTed said:

Heard from someone high up in the club he’s retiring. Has recently had a second grandchild and wants to spend more time with family. Absolutely nothing untoward. 
 

Also heard that Jedinak may be making the step up and has been around the first team more and more the past two weeks. 

Imagine having to report to Mile Jedinak after a game to explain why you were shit? 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My brother in law is a big Brentford supporter and he said that Smith and O’Kelly worked really closely at Brentford, even sharing a house in the area. They’d had a similar working relationship at Walsall and so assuming that continued here, I can’t for a moment believe that it was Smith who wanted to propose the U23 role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Kiwivillan said:

Cutler and the new set piece coach. I don't see a problem

if we have 20 free kicks and 30 thow ins in a game we should be ok.😃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mazrim said:

Hiring more specialist coaches. It's the done thing In America for instance and can work just as well in Football too. You have coaches that will work with just offensive linemen, linebackers, backs, wide receivers, cornerbacks etc. Rather than general coaches. You need guys to have an overview too, like head coaches and assistant coaches. I think it's the way it's going. We have hired a set piece coach for instance.

I've always wondered why football doesn't do more of this. Yes the squads are significantly smaller than an NFL roster, but the idea of coaches specialising in set positions makes a lot of sense. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, HalfTimePost said:

Agreed if it's Deans decision. If somebody else is calling those same decisions and taking it out if Deans hands it's a different thing for me.

It may well still be the right call, but it does change the context

why is it any different to signing players? those that are old school should want the manager to sign the players too. that's not 100% the case at villa as we know and lange is heavily involved in recruitment, so the same rule should apply to the coaching staff. dean has bought into this model so he would have no problem with RoK being demoted, forced out or whatever. the same as when lange finds him a better CM than McGinn who smith clearly loves.

we wont move forward unless we have the best players and best coaches we can. i don't want them to stay at the club just cause they're deano's mates...we need the best people for the job

thanks for the efforts Richard, but no room for sentiment here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DCJonah said:

I've always wondered why football doesn't do more of this. Yes the squads are significantly smaller than an NFL roster, but the idea of coaches specialising in set positions makes a lot of sense. 

I’m sure I read somewhere once that Liverpool have a throw in coach.

I also think they are one of the best teams around at taking advantage of no offsides in throw ins. 

Edited by Vive_La_Villa
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â