Pilchard Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Anyone tell me are player transfers subject to VAT? I'd imagine we'd have more than enough losses to cover any CT on any sales at this stage but would CB's transfer be subject to VAT? Is this as low and desperate for money supporting this club has got? Worrying about VAT on transfers 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Folski Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Anyone tell me are player transfers subject to VAT? I'd imagine we'd have more than enough losses to cover any CT on any sales at this stage but would CB's transfer be subject to VAT? Is this as low and desperate for money supporting this club has got? Worrying about VAT on transfers To be fair I'm trying to specialize in tax so I've a passion for it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicho Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Milner & Benteke in Liverpool shirts is not a nice mental picture Think you might a need a defib as there will soon be a physical picture 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazvfc Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 There's a delay in the signing due to a technical hitch - they need to measure Benteke up for a Shell Suit - Wig and Moustache and show him how to steal hubcaps and dip into dustbins. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dont_do_it_doug. Posted July 22, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2015 Anyone tell me are player transfers subject to VAT? I'd imagine we'd have more than enough losses to cover any CT on any sales at this stage but would CB's transfer be subject to VAT? Looks like they are, jesus no wonder, people are saying we won't have a net spend of £20m, so take VAT off, take off 10% to Benteke, Genk's share and what are we left with. The VAT will be added to the £32.5m as both Aston Villa and Liverpool will be VAT registered. You say you are studying this stuff? 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshVilla Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 (edited) Deal held up by an admin issue What's that bullshitter from ''The Bells Are Ringing" got to do with it? http://www.skysports.com/transfer-centre/ sky reporter if you scroll down mentions it Ah nvm i get it! I see what you did there haha Edited July 22, 2015 by AshVilla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alreadyexists Posted July 22, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted July 22, 2015 (edited) I'll really miss him if I'm honest, even when we were playing really crap I could hold onto the hope that at least benteke is awesome. ha, he's like a brick wall. Edited July 22, 2015 by alreadyexists 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacketspuds Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 I am dreading the Liverpool fans bleating on about how they "made" Benteke when he performs well. Some of my Liverpool supporting work mates still try to classify Sterling as a Liverpool youth system product even though they nicked him off QPR at 15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarpie Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 **** Benteke for going to Lollerpool, his agent must be very desperate to get his 30 pieces of silver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 22, 2015 Moderator Share Posted July 22, 2015 I think if there had been no buyout clause he'd have gone for no more than £25m. So the 2 scenarios are : i) With the buyout clause, he goes to a club that most of us hate, but Villa get £32.5m. ii) Without the buyout clause, he goes to a CL club that we prefer over redscouse, but Villa get £25m. I think given our current lot, I'd have to bury my own prejudices and go with option one, but I do so begrudgingly. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Danishlad Posted July 22, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted July 22, 2015 We sign an unknown player for 7/8 million. In three years he scores alot of goals. We sell him for 32.5 million. Well done everyone. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzy Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 I am dreading the Liverpool fans bleating on about how they "made" Benteke when he performs well. Some of my Liverpool supporting work mates still try to classify Sterling as a Liverpool youth system product even though they nicked him off QPR at 15. Sort of like we do with Gareth Barry, right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Folski Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Anyone tell me are player transfers subject to VAT? I'd imagine we'd have more than enough losses to cover any CT on any sales at this stage but would CB's transfer be subject to VAT? Looks like they are, jesus no wonder, people are saying we won't have a net spend of £20m, so take VAT off, take off 10% to Benteke, Genk's share and what are we left with. The VAT will be added to the £32.5m as both Aston Villa and Liverpool will be VAT registered. You say you are studying this stuff? Ah ya sorry I'm half asleep today, to be fair I'm in Ireland and there's not much £300k transfers not to mind £30m. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam3773 Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 I've missed something. This deal hasn't been completed yet has it? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Folski Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 I think if there had been no buyout clause he'd have gone for no more than £25m. So the 2 scenarios are : i) With the buyout clause, he goes to a club that most of us hate, but Villa get £32.5m. ii) Without the buyout clause, he goes to a CL club that we prefer over redscouse, but Villa get £25m. I think given our current lot, I'd have to bury my own prejudices and go with option one, but I do so begrudgingly. I'm 100% with you on this BOF. Unfortunately it is the exact opposite with Delph, but obviously if there was no clause he'd have gone for free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 22, 2015 Moderator Share Posted July 22, 2015 I've missed something. This deal hasn't been completed yet has it? No but give it a few hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacketspuds Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 I am dreading the Liverpool fans bleating on about how they "made" Benteke when he performs well. Some of my Liverpool supporting work mates still try to classify Sterling as a Liverpool youth system product even though they nicked him off QPR at 15. Sort of like we do with Gareth Barry, right? If you say so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samjp26 Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 I have to tip my hat to the team behind the scenes, including Randy, for sticking out for the full wedge. Real shame to see him go but he is honestly, for me, the best player I have ever seen in our shirt. For that I am proud, grateful and will also continue to give Christian my full support whenever I see him play. He is a special individual that has all the attribute it takes to get to the top of the game, we had a few mishaps, mistakes and a few shaky moments, but I blame his agent and also his immaturity being a young man in a new climate trying to attain his own ambitions. I think now he is a different man; he has ensured we got a healthy profit from his sale by allowing such a clause to be placed in his contract, he gives his all on and off the pitch, he has developed as a player and as a man. When he comes back to Villa Park as in a different shirt, I hope our own fans get behind him and sing him his song. Christian, The Big Man, The Beast - I, for one, will never forget him. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NulliSecundus Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 (edited) I think if there had been no buyout clause he'd have gone for no more than £25m. So the 2 scenarios are : i) With the buyout clause, he goes to a club that most of us hate, but Villa get £32.5m. ii) Without the buyout clause, he goes to a CL club that we prefer over redscouse, but Villa get £25m. I think given our current lot, I'd have to bury my own prejudices and go with option one, but I do so begrudgingly. Option 1 always for me (provided that we spend the money - or at least 75%+ of it - on replacing him). Edited July 22, 2015 by NulliSecundus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulver Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 I think if there had been no buyout clause he'd have gone for no more than £25m. So the 2 scenarios are : i) With the buyout clause, he goes to a club that most of us hate, but Villa get £32.5m. ii) Without the buyout clause, he goes to a CL club that we prefer over redscouse, but Villa get £25m. I think given our current lot, I'd have to bury my own prejudices and go with option one, but I do so begrudgingly. why on earth would we have bothered selling him for 25m ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts