Jump to content

Ciaran Clark


TheSufferingVilla

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

4 goals against since he was taken out of the team. Small strikers beating big and slow defenders. Too bad Sherwood don't see that Clark is ideal against those kind of players.

Don't understand why he was dropped anyway. He was beat in the air by Scott Dann, and that was really his only error all season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 goals against since he was taken out of the team. Small strikers beating big and slow defenders. Too bad Sherwood don't see that Clark is ideal against those kind of players.

Is he? Lens did him like a kipper.

That said I still think Okore-Clark is the best defensive combo at this club, they just clicked together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 goals against since he was taken out of the team. Small strikers beating big and slow defenders. Too bad Sherwood don't see that Clark is ideal against those kind of players.

Don't understand why he was dropped anyway. He was beat in the air by Scott Dann, and that was really his only error all season. 

It is not a mistake to lose in the air once in a while (imo). Even Lescott lost against Rondon today in the air and this is supposed to be his best attribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really don't get how Sherwood hasn't tried Richards at right back. Was quality there the season City won the title.

Some managers seem to have some odd superstition about playing two left footed central players. Even though they'd obviously do it with two right footed ones. Probably not the reason but don't know why it hasn't been tested

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd start him, it's not worth marginalising him to play a 33-year-old who probably won't be much use beyond this season anyway, lets see if him and Richards can strike up a decent long-term partnership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes why did we sign Lescott?

Because he is a much better player. Albeit, he isn't showing it at present!

maybe he was a much better player but Clark has got better and Lescott is past his prime.

Edited by PaulC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes why did we sign Lescott?

Because he is a much better player. Albeit, he isn't showing it at present!

maybe he was a much better player but Clark has got better and Lescott is past his prime.

Pretty even now I think. Play the one who's on a roll. Or less off.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...
Â