Jump to content

The RJW63 Official Jack Grealish Appreciation Thread


kevangrealish

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Stevo985 said:

Yep.

He won't come back, but if he did everyone would love him again. It's quite funny seeing people try to pretend they wouldn't.

Yep, I definitely say no way will I welcome the little turncoat shite back...

... but I know I'd love it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Robbie09 said:

Not by the whole fan base. 

The vast, vast majority. And the rest when he recorded his first assist about 13 minutes into the first game.

I just don't see that his bridges have been burned like some are describing. I don't think that's happened. We were disappointed he left, but he's hardly Dwight Yorke kissing the Man Utd badge in front of Villa fans

Edited by ThunderPower_14
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ThunderPower_14 said:

The vast, vast majority. And the rest when he recorded his first assist about 13 minutes into the first game.

I just don't see that his bridges have been burned like some are describing. I don't think that's happened. We were disappointed he left, but he's hardly Dwight Yorke kissing the Man Utd badge in front of Villa fans

I think the bridges are mostly burned and he wont get the same love he got last time. The love he got was not just because he was talented but because he was supposed to be a die hard Mr Aston Villa. Since it has been revealed he nearly signed for United and had a release clause inserted.

It doesn't help family members are apparently telling people that is more to the transfer than meets the eye

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zatman said:

I think the bridges are mostly burned and he wont get the same love he got last time. The love he got was not just because he was talented but because he was supposed to be a die hard Mr Aston Villa. Since it has been revealed he nearly signed for United and had a release clause inserted.

It doesn't help family members are apparently telling people that is more to the transfer than meets the eye

I disagree that the bridges are burnt. Watching him underperform for City has made people think £100m was a good deal for us, and now Emery is here I think the way Grealish’s departure derailed the Smith project is water under the bridge.

The bigger question is would we actually want him back in footballing terms?

He did hint at the time of the transfer that people would understand the move more one day. Not sure if the implication is that he has a long term fitness issue or what, but it does feel like we sold him at his peak price. Does anyone know what his family have supposedly been telling people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ThunderPower_14 said:

The vast, vast majority. And the rest when he recorded his first assist about 13 minutes into the first game.

I just don't see that his bridges have been burned like some are describing. I don't think that's happened. We were disappointed he left, but he's hardly Dwight Yorke kissing the Man Utd badge in front of Villa fans

Agreed, I think he’s handled it about as well as he could have, outside of popping up to a public training session in preseason when he already had one foot out the door (which I’m not sure was even his decision, anyway).

Wrote a public note to the fans when he left, gave a round of applause to the VP fans upon his return, has only said good things about Villa in public.

I despise him for what he did to us, but deep down I know that if he ever returns to us I’ll love him again.

fwiw (which is nothing), I think if he does return it’ll be in the next couple of seasons on some sort of restructured contract. I don’t think our owners will want someone who is past it, and I can’t see him as a player who is useful into their mid 30s like Ashley Young.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Don_Simon said:

I will never be able to comprehend this.

You despise him? Despise. It's absolutely mental. 

He's a football player who played for your team, and now he doesn't. To carry that level of negative emotion is bat shit kray. 

I think the whole thing is crazy, not only to despise him but then "what he did to us" means that you bought in to all the interviews and PR and social media stuff and then the various online ITKs claiming such and such happened, like it's a real life footballing version of eastenders

I no longer have the attachment to the players or what goes on around them if I'm honest, I don't watch interviews or rarely watch player videos it's all bollocks

Barry and Delph taught me that not grealish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, I was super-p***** when he left and haven't actually watched him much at City.

He still must be a good player but perhaps he has lost something. Possibly needs to be somewhere else, the fit at City never seemed right.

Sure if, (big if) he came back all would be forgotten. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Don_Simon said:

I will never be able to comprehend this.

You despise him? Despise. It's absolutely mental. 

He's a football player who played for your team, and now he doesn't. To carry that level of negative emotion is bat shit kray. 

For me it was the timing. His leaving a week before the window ended completely ruined our entire season. A season in which we were looking to kick on. That season could have ended disastrously for us, and that was 100% on Jack. Had he left earlier in the window, we could have adjusted, and not just panic bought Ings. He left us horribly prepared for the rest of the season, a week after doing all the badge kissing shit. That's why I'm pissed at Jack, not because he left. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, HKP90 said:

For me it was the timing. His leaving a week before the window ended completely ruined our entire season. A season in which we were looking to kick on. That season could have ended disastrously for us, and that was 100% on Jack. Had he left earlier in the window, we could have adjusted, and not just panic bought Ings. He left us horribly prepared for the rest of the season, a week after doing all the badge kissing shit. That's why I'm pissed at Jack, not because he left. 

A valid point for sure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to think we are now a confident club compared to the very recent past and that buying Grealish back is a good decision. I do question what Jack 3.0 would play like. If he can blend his form at villa with his discipline at citeh then it could work. Personally I suspect he's looking for another big contract to make his life more comfortable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, HKP90 said:

For me it was the timing. His leaving a week before the window ended completely ruined our entire season. A season in which we were looking to kick on. That season could have ended disastrously for us, and that was 100% on Jack. Had he left earlier in the window, we could have adjusted, and not just panic bought Ings. He left us horribly prepared for the rest of the season, a week after doing all the badge kissing shit. That's why I'm pissed at Jack, not because he left. 

It's not down to Jack to convince Man City to spend £100,000,000 at a time more suitable for Aston Villa. That's not his responsibility so you're pissed off at him for doing something he had absolutely no control over. Apart from choosing to leave or not, and I'm sure he would have rather that happen much sooner also. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have him back no question.

We've still got a void on the left given Coutinho transfer has turned out to be a bust. Finally Bailey has established himself but he can play either side and on some games he'll be more effective on the right. Indeed in long run Emery might want to play him more centrally.

We've spent plenty of money since he left but haven't come close to replacing him which was always a big ask given his unique ability. And imagine what Ramsey would be thinking if we re-signed someone who he was looking up to and then was a team mate for six months, very exciting the potential left sided combinations between those two.

That said I don't see him leaving Man. City next summer, still think Bellingham is more likely to end up at Liverpool as they really need him more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HKP90 said:

For me it was the timing. His leaving a week before the window ended completely ruined our entire season. A season in which we were looking to kick on. That season could have ended disastrously for us, and that was 100% on Jack. Had he left earlier in the window, we could have adjusted, and not just panic bought Ings. He left us horribly prepared for the rest of the season, a week after doing all the badge kissing shit. That's why I'm pissed at Jack, not because he left. 

He left in July 2021. Would've probably been earlier if the euros hadn't taken place that summer as he needed a few weeks off after the final.

So we had a month to plan things (and let's be honest there was no  dramatic U turn like Delph all those summers back) but we just decided Ings, Bailey and Buendia was going to be enough and for various reasons they all really struggled last season to make an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Don_Simon said:

It's not down to Jack to convince Man City to spend £100,000,000 at a time more suitable for Aston Villa. That's not his responsibility so you're pissed off at him for doing something he had absolutely no control over. Apart from choosing to leave or not, and I'm sure he would have rather that happen much sooner also. 

We could have said no. He could have said no. He said he was here to stay. He'd just signed a 5 year contract. 

6 minutes ago, VillaChris said:

He left in July 2021. Would've probably been earlier if the euros hadn't taken place that summer as he needed a few weeks off after the final.

So we had a month to plan things (and let's be honest there was no  dramatic U turn like Delph all those summers back) but we just decided Ings, Bailey and Buendia was going to be enough and for various reasons they all really struggled last season to make an impact.

Purslow made his announcement on August 5th, leaving us 18 working days to replace out top player, who we'd built a team around. The window had been open from June 9th. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HKP90 said:

We could have said no. He could have said no. He said he was here to stay. He'd just signed a 5 year contract. 

Purslow made his announcement on August 5th, leaving us 18 working days to replace out top player, who we'd built a team around. The window had been open from June 9th. 

Such is football...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â