Jump to content

General Chat


Stevo985

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Genie said:

No firm evidence yet just the fact the friendship started when the lad was only 11/12 before becoming sexual at some point, and also this young man hasn’t said a word yet. There’s pictures of them together when he’s very young.

At some point someone will buy the lads story and then it’ll be more clear what happened. 

Not unless Phil stops paying him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 years in prison for enabling people to view football streams. It's organised crime, that they made a lot of money from, and they knew what they were doing, but 11 years? You'll find no end of rapists being given far, far more lenient sentences. But don't you dare cost some billionaires some cash

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65697595

Quote

Five men who illegally streamed Premier League football matches to tens of thousands of people have been jailed.

The gang sold cut-price £10-a-month subscriptions, bragging they made money showing games not otherwise available to watch live in the UK because of "blackout" broadcasting rules.

Their operation, described as the biggest so far, received more than £7m from 50,000 subscribers.

The sentencing follows a rare private prosecution by the Premier League.

The fraud prosecution was brought to protect "some of the world's most valuable content", the league's lawyers said.

At Derby Crown Court, the gang's "prime mover", Mark Gould, 36, was sentenced to 11 years in prison.

Four other members were sentenced to between three and more than five years.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Davkaus said:

11 years in prison for enabling people to view football streams. It's organised crime, that they made a lot of money from, and they knew what they were doing, but 11 years? You'll find no end of rapists being given far, far more lenient sentences. But don't you dare cost some billionaires some cash

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65697595

But people keep telling me streams are legal :detect:

I don't want to defend them, but if the PL aren't seen to be defending their "property", it becomes public domain and then only clubs owned by foreign governments will be able to compete.

I'm surprised at the sentences though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davkaus said:

11 years in prison for enabling people to view football streams. It's organised crime, that they made a lot of money from, and they knew what they were doing, but 11 years? You'll find no end of rapists being given far, far more lenient sentences. But don't you dare cost some billionaires some cash

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65697595

 

Fraud always gets longer sentences

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11yrs, wow. As Limpid said above, the PL need to defend their product, and at the end of the day the guys have broken law, but that sentence seems absurd. 
 

I have unsuccessfully tried to find out a bit more about the below as it’s not quite clear what Christopher Felvus got for having indecent images of children, or if indeed he’s been sentenced for that yet? Be interesting to see if they have taken a dimmer view on a bloke selling footie streams than they have with a flipping nonce. BBC
 

 

Four other members were sentenced to between three and more than five years. 

One of them, Christopher Felvus, 36, was also found guilty of voyeurism and possessing indecent images of children, discovered on his computer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Davkaus said:

11 years in prison for enabling people to view football streams. It's organised crime, that they made a lot of money from, and they knew what they were doing, but 11 years? You'll find no end of rapists being given far, far more lenient sentences. But don't you dare cost some billionaires some cash

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65697595

Absolutely ridiculous.  That's almost as much as murder in some cases, and definitely much more that serious assault or rape. 

Should have been a 12 day suspended sentence to bring it in line with violent crimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/05/2023 at 06:58, TheAuthority said:

Being famous is the last thing I would ever want.

Is that because the media would find that 1996 home video of you shoving a trumpet up your arse and farting the close encounters of the third kind tune?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lapal_fan said:

Is that because the media would find that 1996 home video of you shoving a trumpet up your arse and farting the close encounters of the third kind tune?

It was Raider of the Lost Ark.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lapal_fan said:

Is that because the media would find that 1996 home video of you shoving a trumpet up your arse and farting the close encounters of the third kind tune?

Already available on youtuba 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, StefanAVFC said:

If it's 11 years for that, I wonder how long 100+ charges of financial fraud are according to the PL 🤨

You know how the PL works. 11 years for stealing from them. What City did was basically make the Premier League product stronger by being such a good team. Their alleged irregularities actually benefitted the Premier League so they'll get bugger all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BOF said:

You know how the PL works. 11 years for stealing from them. What City did was basically make the Premier League product stronger by being such a good team. Their alleged irregularities actually benefitted the Premier League so they'll get bugger all.

Unlike Everton who will get taken up the wrong 'un

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, lapal_fan said:

Is that because the media would find that 1996 home video of you shoving a trumpet up your arse and farting the close encounters of the third kind tune?

Close Encounters of the Turd Kind. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Davkaus said:

11 years in prison for enabling people to view football streams. It's organised crime, that they made a lot of money from, and they knew what they were doing, but 11 years? You'll find no end of rapists being given far, far more lenient sentences. But don't you dare cost some billionaires some cash

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65697595

 

Its ridiculous- honestly thia just shows how pathwtic our laws are. Give them a couple years and a hit them with a fine (they have enough money)

When you consider some paedos get less its pathetic and infuriating 

The way i look at this if

1) you could have access to 3pm games on a affordable option

2) sky/ virgin make their products more affordable for people not just rip people off for their extortionate fees.

I know there will be the argument the money goes to the football pyramid so thats where the real issue arises with footballerS wages etc.

But surely there are better ways? Why don't the government make IPTV taxable? We get cheaper football and the government makes money out of it 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â