Jump to content

Summer transfer window 2021


zab6359

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, MaVilla said:

 

looks worse for us than it is though, we spent 100m of those on mostly stupid buys in our championship years, in the failed attempt to get back up asap.

So ye, we might be 10th on the list there, but we havent spent 250m on supposed top league capable players.

On the other hand, Maure spending 500m net, Arsenal 300m net etc, shows how poor their PL purchases have been overall.

Are you not being completely hypocritical there? Villa spent money but it didn't count, it was in the championship!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, paul514 said:

So I have just watched a football daily video on Everton’s spending under their new owners, it came up with a table of the teams with the highest net spend on players over the past five seasons over the top five European leagues and we are tenth!

Man City -563

Man Utd -498

PSG - 335

Barcelona -334

Inter Milan -317

Arsenal -307

AC Milan -264

Chelsea -264

Everton -256

Aston Villa -252

How many of those teams had to completely build a top flight squad practically from scratch?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pulisic is my ridiculous dream suggestion over Barkley this summer ... Grealish on the Left, Pulisic on the Right with Watkins Central. Then Sanson, Luiz & Mcginn behind. 

Edited by thabucks
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, VillaChris said:

Just mentioned him elsewhere as he's scored but what about Daniel James once Man. United inevitably sign Jaydon Sancho in the summer?

Fits our profile and would give us genuine pace on the right.

Is he good enough? I have never really watched him in detail and all I hear is about how he isn't good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Vive_La_Villa said:

It was a rhetorical question mate to highlight how much of a rebuild was needed. Didn’t meant to offend you. 

Also needs to be noted that a large percentage of that money was squandered on overpaid tripe, before the current board and management came in.

So probably not a fair reflection.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, paul514 said:

Is he good enough? I have never really watched him in detail and all I hear is about how he isn't good enough.

He had flaws but is lightning fast and decent finisher so would say he's upgrade on Trez.

If Lingard can walk into the current 4th place team and look their best player incredibly then I reckon Dan James can make an impact here as he fits what we look for in player last few years and still very young and already played 50 odd games of Man. United.

Obviously avoid though if Man. United use it to get some sort of option on Grealish.

Edited by VillaChris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, VillaChris said:

He had flaws but is lightning fast and decent finisher so would say he's upgrade on Trez.

If Lingard can walk into the current 4th place team and look their best player incredibly then I reckon Dan James can make an impact here as he fits what we look for in player last few years and still very young and already played 50 odd games of Man. United.

Obviously avoid though if Man. United use it to get some sort of option on Grealish.

I don't just want any old upgrade on Trez though, it has to be significant. I'm not saying he wouldn't be a good buy or a significant upgrade just that I don't know.

I guess it would be cost dependent on if he would be a good signing, I see a lot of value in the 10/wide forward market at the moment you have Buendia, Sarr and Olise in the Championship that price dependant would be good options and you have players abroad like Brandt apparently available for 22.5m.

As far as I am concerned Barkley can piss off and I don't think El Ghazi or Trez are good enough although I do think Trez offers the team something that others don't give unlike El Ghazi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, paul514 said:

I don't just want any old upgrade on Trez though, it has to be significant. I'm not saying he wouldn't be a good buy or a significant upgrade just that I don't know.

I guess it would be cost dependent on if he would be a good signing, I see a lot of value in the 10/wide forward market at the moment you have Buendia, Sarr and Olise in the Championship that price dependant would be good options and you have players abroad like Brandt apparently available for 22.5m.

As far as I am concerned Barkley can piss off and I don't think El Ghazi or Trez are good enough although I do think Trez offers the team something that others don't give unlike El Ghazi.

Don't think we'll be looking at those wide positions, but if the right player is available, maybe one gets sold and we get an upgrade.

Not a fan of Barkley, but not prepared to write him off just yet, but will come down to price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JAMAICAN-VILLAN said:

Also needs to be noted that a large percentage of that money was squandered on overpaid tripe, before the current board and management came in.

So probably not a fair reflection.

It's just a headline figure. On the surface it's looks like Villa have spent a lot of money over the last 5 years but if you consider in those 5 years we have very rarely received a transfer sum for any player it's a miracle that it is so low. We didn't have more than one or two saleable assets in terms of players up until the start of last season. In the promotion season maybe 3 - Hourihane, McGinn and Grealish. I can't think of any more.

It's also paints the previous ownership in a good light if you just look at the figure, as it doesn't mention anything about our owner acting like a drunk in a casino and almost sending the club into administration. It just looks like, they spent a lot of money and were just unlucky. And regarding the new owners and the last four transfer windows, the 200 odd million has probably been the best spent money in this club in a long long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After given it some thought in the summer I would like to see us go in for Rodrigo De Paul of Udinese, as our #10 with the cash we may have earmarked to make Barkley permanent.

He seemed to very close to signing with Leeds in the summer for €35m but don't believe Leeds were able to stump up the cash.

image.thumb.png.925da69b656fb2d04d4cb1d1e7c1ddfc.png

In terms of creative output, he's up in their with the best in Europe but what would suit us is his style isn't of mecurial Ozil type that can float in and out of games but instead a far more gritty midfielder which as you can see from the comparisons has shades of KDB lite to him and seems more focused on positive creative build up rather than just getting on the end of moves.

 

Certainly worth a watch, I really think the way he drifts to the left flank is quite Barkley esque and would lead to him combining with JG well but with the consistency and grit that Barkley isn't currently affording us. He will certainly be a coup, Leeds will be certain to come back in for him with Liverpool recently mooted with an interest, regardless it would be the statement signing after our '3rd season' in the premier league in which FFP becomes far less onerous and will earmark our intent into cracking into Europe as a regular force.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see Villa 'try' and step away from signing easy targets like those who are potentially going to be relegated.

Sooner or later we need to be trying to sign players who are already currently successful rather than those like Berge and Trossard who are used to struggling.

Rodrigo De Paul is a marquee signing of that description and I believe he was mentioned before we signed Barkley. De Paul would certainly take some of the pressure off Grealish and a front four of Watkins, Grealish, Traore and De Paul is potentially up there with the best in the PL.

Edited by Zhan_Zhuang
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â