Jump to content

Russia and its “Special Operation” in Ukraine


maqroll

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 18.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bickster

    1816

  • magnkarl

    1480

  • Genie

    1270

  • avfc1982am

    1145

1 hour ago, trekka said:

Oh how times have changed.

giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47v7qicpic8hlzndsevd

 

“ so I said to Monica, do you like chicken“

she said “yeah”

so I said “well suck this it’s foul” 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
4 hours ago, Chindie said:

Ukraine to be a much smaller country in 5, 4, 3...

Crimea was bad but this is potentially on an entirely different scale. Thing about war is it reliably never turns out the way the people who start it expect it will.

UK, US & a handful of others have spent weeks pre-supplying a Ukrainian insurgency with all manner of nasties. They won’t stop Russia getting in, but the Motherland’s finest may not fancy  hanging about for too long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Awol said:

Crimea was bad but this is potentially on an entirely different scale. Thing about war is it reliably never turns out the way the people who start it expect it will.

UK, US & a handful of others have spent weeks pre-supplying a Ukrainian insurgency with all manner of nasties. They won’t stop Russia getting in, but the Motherland’s finest may not fancy  hanging about for too long. 

What’s the objective here, is it to annex more Ukrainian land like they did Crimea? Are they going to try and storm their way to Kiev, a bit like what they did with Tbilisi a few years back to force them to surrender? 

When you say nasties, in what sense do you mean? 

Edited by Tayls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My best guess would be Russia wants to annex more of Ukraine - the east leans towards Moscow and Putin has spent a decade ensuring loyal fighters are in strong supply there - and to ensure Ukraine is turned away from the West for good.

The gamble is basically whether the West has any desire to fight over it. I'd bet Putin thinks not, but also that he's well prepared to commit to a long low level insurgency type conflict if needs be. And I'm not sure the West is.

It sets a grim precedent though, and suggests Putin can push for more of Eastern Europe to fall into his hands. It also would lead to those countries questioning whether they really want to throw their hat in the ring with a group of nations that didn't stand up to the bullying of Russia, twice, against a nation that is much more important than many of the others that might want to get into NATO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tayls said:

What’s the objective here, is it to annex more Ukrainian land like they did Crimea? Are they going to try and storm their way to Kiev, a bit like what they did with Tbilisi a few years back to force them to surrender? 

When you say nasties, in what sense do you mean? 

Only the Russians know their true objective. If they take everything east of the Dneipr river then they secure Crimea & Donbass, take most of Ukraine’s industrial capacity, end Ukraine as a state in its current form and assert Russian power over its near abroad while defying the West and undermining European security architecture.

If they try to take the whole of Ukraine then the chance of direct conflict with NATO members increases significantly, b/c Russian combat forces would have to push up against Poland, Romania etc. 

Either way the West will rightly help them to resist Russian invasion with everything short of direct involvement. Beyond Crimea, Donbass and Luhansk the Russians have no support at all, and possibly not even a majority support anywhere beyond Crimea.

We’re supplying them anti-tank and Surface to Air Missiles, plus lots of more niche stuff. As importantly we’ve lots of people there advising them on the finer details. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the Russian economy is in the toilet at the moment, and a lot of people in Russia aren't happy with Putin. This gives him a good opportunity to play the war card to boost his ratings. He did the same in Chechnya which increased his approval rating by like 40%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Useful little graphic to picture the size of Ukraine. Even for 150,000+ Russian soldiers that’s a lot of space to occupy, especially as it’s filled with people who don’t want them there.
 

3741767B-ACD6-451A-81E8-F17B9919B90F.jpeg

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tayls said:

What’s the objective here, is it to annex more Ukrainian land like they did Crimea? Are they going to try and storm their way to Kiev, a bit like what they did with Tbilisi a few years back to force them to surrender? 

When you say nasties, in what sense do you mean? 

The likely objective is to get concessions without any conflict at all, but if that is not on the cards then it will probably be an incursion into eastern Ukraine, into those provinces (specifically Donetsk and Luhansk) that are the subject of the Minsk II agreement. I will personally be very surprised if they invade the entire country: while I don't see any reason to think they would be *unable* to do so, the human, military and financial costs would be enormous, and the further they get from the Russian border the less acceptance they would/will find from the populace. I also just think it's completely unnecessary in terms of sending the message they want to send (broadly 'you should not accept Ukraine into Nato').

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now, anyone with the flight radar app on their phone can still track the US drones flying right up to the Russian border and then throwing a 180 turn.

I guess whilst the tracking is still public its still phoney war.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, chrisp65 said:

Right now, anyone with the flight radar app on their phone can still track the US drones flying right up to the Russian border and then throwing a 180 turn.

I guess whilst the tracking is still public its still phoney war.

 

When the embassy staff leave you know it’s about to kick off. The Russians “reduced” their embassy staff in the last day or so. That’s what’s triggered everyone else to gtfo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, HanoiVillan said:

The likely objective is to get concessions without any conflict at all, but if that is not on the cards then it will probably be an incursion into eastern Ukraine, into those provinces (specifically Donetsk and Luhansk) that are the subject of the Minsk II agreement. I will personally be very surprised if they invade the entire country: while I don't see any reason to think they would be *unable* to do so, the human, military and financial costs would be enormous, and the further they get from the Russian border the less acceptance they would/will find from the populace. I also just think it's completely unnecessary in terms of sending the message they want to send (broadly 'you should not accept Ukraine into Nato').

I think the current military think-tank prediction is they’re most likely to want to quickly encircle Kiev and force regime change.

Nobody knows for sure, obviously, but it’s certainly plausible (apparently you can drive a tank from the Belarus border to Kiev in two hours).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â