Chine Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 2 minutes ago, foreveryoung said: On SSN now if you wanna here more speculation. Its season 3 of the summer box sets , 4 weeks of constant edge of the seat again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aston_Villan4 Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 (edited) I agree with this chap. (Even though I'm still firmly in the "He's not going anywhere and still don't think this is anything more than rumors" camp.) Edited July 29, 2021 by Aston_Villan4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidcow Posted July 29, 2021 VT Supporter Share Posted July 29, 2021 21 minutes ago, Big Salad said: Are their any reputable **** media sources? They all just paraphrase one another, assume way too much, and expect everyone to lap up what they say, its pathetic. A lie will run around the Internet based media before the truth has got his reboot done. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 1 minute ago, Zhan_Zhuang said: I bet they are orgasmic at the very prospect of him leaving. Let's face it the media are designing this to strengthen the top teams and belittle Villa. Said, Man City gotta offer £100 million plus, which they think they won't. Villa don't want to sell and want to build the team around jack offering him a new big salary contract. Balanced to be fair and about where we are. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 5 minutes ago, foreveryoung said: On SSN now if you wanna here more speculation. Do they actually declare "sky sources" as "saw it on twitter mate" Will be fun tomorrow when their transfer muppets come on to claim their insider knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhan_Zhuang Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Just now, foreveryoung said: Said, Man City gotta offer £100 million plus, which they think they won't. Villa don't want to sell and want to build the team around jack offering him a new big salary contract. Balanced to be fair and about where we are. Good to hear, thanks for the update. Just hope NSWE stick to that. One would think Citeh's priority was Kane anyway, not both. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Other Mat Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Just now, foreveryoung said: Said, Man City gotta offer £100 million plus, which they think they won't. Villa don't want to sell and want to build the team around jack offering him a new big salary contract. Balanced to be fair and about where we are. So the same place we were 6/5/4/3/2/1 weeks ago? Haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MotoMkali Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 3 minutes ago, villa4europe said: Do they actually declare "sky sources" as "saw it on twitter mate" Will be fun tomorrow when their transfer muppets come on to claim their insider knowledge Tbf romano is a sky reporter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubberman Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Jack has just spent weeks with the England squad getting a taste of what he'd get at City. Big name, but no guarantee of starting and having to be part of a squad with playing time here and there. Whereas here he knows hes the man - plays every game, everything goes through him. He loves playing football - he'll realise that's at villa. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awol Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 1 hour ago, Sulberto21 said: Hopefully the talks go something like: Shaykh Mansour : we want Grealish for £100m, NSWE : that's a nice deposit when will you be paying the remaining £900m ? Dialling tone...... Kudos. That’s a very niche (and correct) spelling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Willard Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 I don't think he is leaving. Am I starting to get a little concerned, perhaps. I do trust the people at the top to make the right decisions. Just news outlets are going off sources that claim to have no idea. City are a well run club, they arent like United. They buy world class players but they do get abit of value for money compared. They went after Kane, decided against it for the money. I believe we'll give similar answers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidcow Posted July 29, 2021 VT Supporter Share Posted July 29, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, JONESYVILLA said: Sure all the team got more followers (too old for Instagram) during the euros as the country was on a high, social media is beyond me but I’m sure it’s easy just to click ‘add/follow’ or whatever . All I heard on talk sport was Rice this, Sterling that, and Phillips is the Yorkshire Pirlo. Grealish was a bit part player as Southgate didn’t fancy him, the media built him up before hand to win the tournament on his own but he was not given the chance to show if he could deliver over 90 minutes at the highest level game in game out. Oh yes, sorry. There is very little interest in Jack. You're absolutely right. I'm a little embarrassed. I offer my sincere apologies to you. Edited July 29, 2021 by sidcow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delphinho123 Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Oddly enough, I’m more confident of him staying now than what I was a week or so ago. Provided there is no release clause (the recent speculation suggests there isn’t), I think we’ll price Man City out of the move. They can probably only afford Grealish at around 80-90m if they want to go and spend 150m on Kane. I also think the new contract and the sales job we’ll do in person over the next few days will be enough. City are a fantastic team, there is no denying that, but I don’t think they’ll get Grealish and will go all out for Kane. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyh29 Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Is it just me thats pissed off that Sky can’t even be bothered to use a newish photo of Jack ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post HanoiVillan Posted July 29, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 29, 2021 33 minutes ago, Jareth said: https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11679/12367443/jack-grealish-man-city-open-talks-with-aston-villa-over-england-midfielder Sky Sports News has been told City made their initial approach several days ago, and lines of communication remain open. Seems like stalemate Football media in this country talk to fans like idiots. Maybe fans deserve nothing better, but they're definitely talking to us like idiots. I mean, 'lines of communication remain open'? What, everyone involved has a mobile? It's a **** football transfer you bellends, it's not the 38th **** parallel. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnyp Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 4 minutes ago, tonyh29 said: Is it just me thats pissed off that Sky can’t even be bothered to use a newish photo of Jack ? It's just you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidcow Posted July 29, 2021 VT Supporter Share Posted July 29, 2021 3 hours ago, Tayls said: That’s that then, end of a short era of having Grealish playing regularly in the senior side. Be interesting how we progress from here before we get robbed again of one of our best players to an elite side which we will never be a part of. Football is pure trash. Man City is the ultimate draw for a player captaining his boyhood side in the premier league. Come on now, there’s no hope anymore. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont_do_it_doug. Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 My own personal thoughts aside, in fairness to Sky, that's a pretty balanced article and probably the nearest thing to the truth we have seen yet. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HalfTimePost Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 36 minutes ago, stewiek2 said: If we sell Jack now I think it's because his shins are f**ked and we know they only going to get worse and we're cashing in now rather than let him stay and basically play less and less games. £100m for someone who has NEVER played a full season. We can't afford to make someone our top paid player by a mile when he misses 10-15+ games a season. Nice thought (sort of) but City will have the best medical staff going, they'll know his injuries too. There's no way somebody pays £100m without having some data on the latest injury that kept him out for 3 months. The data will be part of the deal and if they thought the same they wouldn't spend £100m on him. Gone are the days of pulling the wool over peoples eyes imo. Too much data and analytics for a big thing like that to be missed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delphinho123 Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Just now, dont_do_it_doug. said: My own personal thoughts aside, in fairness to Sky, that's a pretty balanced article and probably the nearest thing to the truth we have seen yet. Yes, and Rob Dorsett *I think*, is fairly accurate. I will find it hilarious if we demand £150m or something daft and the media are all there scratching their heads wondering why we haven’t bent over backwards. Lest they forget Nassef Sawiris and Wes Eden’s aren’t here to make friends. $$$. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts