a m ole Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 “No contact” 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmygreaves Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, rodders0223 said: I don't think the ref takes into account 3000 minutes of football when making a split second decision. No.... just who the opposition is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumblerseven Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 (edited) I swear this month i saw a football game with flying tackle with no contact. Ball controlling player stoped and gave up possesion before potentialy injuring tackle and got the ball back by refere. Im actualy angry. Edited May 9, 2021 by Tumblerseven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkyvilla Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 He didn't even claim for a penalty or pretend he was injured either. I'm not sure what he was supposed to be 'simulating'. Only thing I'd criticise Ollie for is the first booking. He didn't really need to dive in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turvontour Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 27 minutes ago, a m ole said: “No contact” Why wasnt it reviewed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sulberto21 Posted May 9, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted May 9, 2021 Just now, turvontour said: Why wasnt it reviewed? Official var explanation was that Ollie wasn't playing for Manure. 4 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick76 Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 1 minute ago, turvontour said: Why wasnt it reviewed? because it was a second yellow not a straight red. Yellow cards arent reviewable currently as far as I am aware. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a m ole Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 Just now, turvontour said: Why wasnt it reviewed? Assume because it was a yellow card, they can’t overturn it. Not really got a problem with them saying it’s not enough to give a penalty. The ref calling it a dive is just absolutely outrageous though, it’s saying a player is not allowed to attempt avoiding injury. A dangerous precedent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick76 Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 1 minute ago, Sulberto21 said: Official var explanation was that Ollie wasn't playing for Manure. and the fourth official was wearing a Man U shirt in back at Head Office 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmygreaves Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 Just now, nick76 said: because it was a second yellow not a straight red. Yellow cards arent reviewable currently as far as I am aware. It was a pen!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick76 Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 1 minute ago, jimmygreaves said: It was a pen!!! Completely agree but they arent going to give us a pen against Man U, be serious my answer was re yellow cards being reviewable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulberto21 Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 Just now, nick76 said: and the fourth official was wearing a Man U shirt in back at Head Office I wonder if the bung was delivered like so. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
May-Z Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 1 hour ago, rodders0223 said: I don't think the ref takes into account 3000 minutes of football when making a split second decision. This is arguably exactly what a ref should be doing. Using experience of prior events to inform decisions so his thinking 'in the moment' isn't being overloaded. If anything, 3000 mins isn't enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HongKongVillan Posted May 9, 2021 VT Supporter Share Posted May 9, 2021 1 hour ago, a m ole said: “No contact” VAR said this was photoshoped 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
May-Z Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 33 minutes ago, nick76 said: because it was a second yellow not a straight red. Yellow cards arent reviewable currently as far as I am aware. Should it have been reviewed for a possible pen, if not the yellow? Did that happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodders0223 Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 Games gone when diving players don't get given penalties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a m ole Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 1 minute ago, May-Z said: Should it have been reviewed for a possible pen, if not the yellow? Did that happen? They don’t review yellows as far as I’m aware unless it was mistaken identity, and I don’t really have a problem with them saying there’s not enough evidence to give a pen if they did review it. This ones on Chris Kavanagh, not VAR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Zen Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 If his suspension stands, it’s a complete joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a m ole Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 Just now, El Zen said: If his suspension stands, it’s a complete joke. Second yellow, so we can’t. Incredible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummybloke Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 Ridiculous decision which according to commentary was reviewed by VAR and not a penalty. Of course it wont be given as a penalty because the ref has just given a 2nd yellow. That would mean VAR over ruling a yellow which they are not allowed to do. However I thought if it was a clear and obvious error it COULD be reviewed? But as I say, they were never going to give it once the ref gave the yellow. Let's see just how good we are without ollie for a game. Will it show we clearly need another forward or will it give davis a chance to stake his claim ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts