Tumblerseven

oh my god a picture. guys it looks like dresden it must be indiscriminate bombing. you cant be serious. please go read how airforce works and how bombing are decided.

Oh the indiscriminate bombing another buzzword. You dont even know what indiscriminate bombing looks like. Read about Dresden jesus christ. You understand that it makes no sense? right? you must know this. Most densely populated region in the world a strip. 3 month indiscriminate bombing campaign. 30k dead? its not indiscriminate bombing by any standard! stop using these buzzwords they dont make any sense.

you said this too first random page. I dont understand are we like pretending that people in here dont demonize israel? :DDD Or your argument i said a few nice things so that means im fair? you cant be serious.

No it is hilarious that you dont see how for 100 pages from october 7 people in here is demonizing and going after israel in an unfair manner. Those people who look at israel and hamas and dont see clear difference in their actions those people are unreasonable. If person cant see a difference between a bombing with intent to kill terrorists and a terrorist who rapes and beheads people thats... i dont even know what to say to that.

Imagine saying this when there is @chrisp65 and @Jareth in this forum who comment alot and who categorically paint this conflict from one point of view. I was calling this out months ago! Hilarious

If you use this concept of a war crime you should read about it more. The destruction of a hospital does not automatically constitute a war crime. You are cherry picking concepts and terms but you not really believe in them. If tomorrow ICJ would come out and say: no that X hospital bombing is not a war crime. You would disagree. I think you just using these buzzwords to strengthen your sentences. What makes hospital bombing and 10 dead children inside it not a war crime can you answer that question?

On January 26, 2024, Donoghue delivered an interim ruling on South Africa v. Israel on behalf of the ICJ.

Genocidal intent - Wikipedia You can keep screaming for hundreds of pages its genocide its genocide its just your feelings and narrative spinning nothing else just words who hold no weight.. To everyone who actually cares should go and read what south africa provided to support their accusations and prove dolus specialis. I think after that you might be very sceptical of the outcome of that case

So didint i retracted my hypocrisy comment to you like two weeks ago? I cant believe that a grown man cries for two weeks about the statement i retracted two weeks ago its unbelievable. You say i dont answer questions? but you cant name one? or what the problem name the question you want me so much to answer. Few days ago i asked you do you want to ask me a question? [mod edit personal stuff removed] I love how no person in here who i talked to will not step up and say no this guy is clearly trying to answer question or answering questions. You cant even do this but you will watch how people just blatantly lying about me. Actual no moral compas grown people acting like they are school bulies.

So thank you for confirming that this is a bad faith discussion and you people actually just bad faith. You've suggested it as a solution to the conflict, the least undesireable one. no i actually didint. My solution to the conflict is to free gaza which i told mutiple times. but you just ignore this because you bad faith. We talking here about hypothetical scenario i gave you! are you like serious right now?

I never said i want or it needs to be ethnic cleansing first of all. I am actually shocked by some of the people's English language comprehension in here. This is insane either this is completely bad faith and you guys running with group thinking because you want to fit in or you actually like have some mental disabilities. People in here cant even differentiate between description explanation and advocation. jesus christ.

Right to Exist: This means that a country is recognized and respected by the international community, and it has the legal and diplomatic standing to exist as a sovereign state. Other countries acknowledge its existence and sovereignty, and it is typically a member of the United Nations or has diplomatic relations with other nations. Inherent Right to Exist: This concept goes a step further and suggests that the country's existence is seen as a fundamental and natural aspect, similar to the way we recognize the basic rights of individuals. In this context, the country's right to exist is considered an intrinsic and fundamental principle, and its territorial integrity is protected not only because it is acknowledged by others but because it is a basic and natural state of affairs. So, when we say a country has the "right to exist" but doesn't have the "inherent right to exist," we mean that the country is recognized and respected by the international community, but its existence may not be viewed as an inherent and fundamental principle in the same way that, for example, the inherent rights of individuals are recognized. The distinction may imply that the country's existence relies on external recognition and acceptance rather than being seen as a fundamental and natural aspect of the international order. So to say that countries doesnt have an inherent right to exist is not an evil statement. I dont appreciate that in this forum we are pretending that its an evil statement and demonize people. So i dont cry and im not against the soviet union collapsing. If you think that countries have inherent right to exist that should mean that you are against the soviet union collapsing. And by this logic its territorial integrity is protected not only because it is acknowledged by others but because it is a basic and natural state of affairs. Your thinking should be that israel got its lands in 1948 illegally and if it got its land illegally what follows..

Please stop fantasizing about my "war crimes" in your sleep ok? That person who talked about nukes is crazy its insanity. He should be fired from position of power. Oh and they did already but no one mentions it because they are pushing the narrative. Israel minister suspended after calling nuking Gaza an option – POLITICO

@VILLAMARV so you clearly have no idea room temperature iq engagement. So lets ask an AI a higher intelligence creature than VILLAMARV Question: If i say that population cleansing is not inherently a bad thing. With that first statement do i say that its a good thing? Explanation for slow people: No, saying that "population cleansing is not inherently a bad thing" does not mean that you are saying it is a good thing. It is crucial to understand the context and the nuances of the statement. By saying that it is "not inherently a bad thing," you are acknowledging that there might be varying perspectives or contexts in which people may discuss the topic. However, it's essential to emphasize that population cleansing, in its common understanding, involves the forced removal or elimination of people from a particular ethnic or racial group, often involving violence and human rights abuses. It is widely considered a grave violation of human rights and international law, and it is generally viewed negatively in the international community. If you wish to express a positive opinion about something, you would need to use more explicit and affirmative language to convey that viewpoint.

Wait you dont know? Then why attack me and then make fun of me? I asked you what you understood what is the message?