honest_bertie Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 honest_bertie, no he didn't. Ba was assisting West Ham to relegation at the time. But I know you confused Ba with Ameobi! ah yeh nice one SikhInTrinity, my mistake... still i wouldn't mind seeing Ba at Villa, apparently he wants to stay in Prem and has a clause in his contract that he can go to another prem team for 7 mil or more, around that price I'd say he would be as good value if not better than Fletcher (not saying Fletcher not a good player just over valued at +10 mil). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyHowell Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 prediction. AC will stay at LIverpool until the winter window. Then he'll go to anyone who will take off Liverpool's hands! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel Posted July 31, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted July 31, 2012 PLayed with SI when he was on loan up there . I probably played with Ba more during his loan period! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Jonno Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 He is left out of Liverpools squad for their qualifier, reckon he is off to Newcastle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted August 1, 2012 Moderator Share Posted August 1, 2012 He did say he wants to move to someone in European competition. So it would be stupid even by Homer Simpson's standards for Liverpool to cup-tie him. He can still end up anywhere though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PieFacE Posted August 1, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted August 1, 2012 Got to be Newcastle. What other Premier League clubs are in the UEFA comp? or Europa or whatever It's called... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valhalla Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 I don`t want any of those euro 2012 England jokers here. Buy some foreigners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shillzz Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 For the money it's going to take, I'd rather we looked elsewhere. It's clear that he doesnt really want to leave Liverpool, certainly not for a sensible amount of money anyway. The last thing we need to do is get someone in on £80,000 a week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Anyone know how much Carroll is Actually on? 80k? 90k? 60-70k? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PussEKatt Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 It dosent really matter what he is on,he has said that he wants european football. So cant really see him comming here or West Ham for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moose Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 I reckon he'll move to West Ham at 11.30pm on transfer deadline day when it's clear nobody else wants him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3te Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Anyone know how much Carroll is Actually on? 80k? 90k? 60-70k? 65k apparently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG_Villa_Fan Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Anyone know how much Carroll is Actually on? 80k? 90k? 60-70k? 65k apparently Really doubt he's on that low of a wage. He was a 35 million transfer, if his agent has only negotiated 65K a week Carroll should have fired him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3te Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Anyone know how much Carroll is Actually on? 80k? 90k? 60-70k? 65k apparently Really doubt he's on that low of a wage. He was a 35 million transfer, if his agent has only negotiated 65K a week Carroll should have fired him. the fee was more that liverpool told chelsea they wanted 15m in cash, plus whatever carroll cost for torres not because they valued torres at 50m, or carroll at 35m had carroll cost 15m, torres wouldve cost 30m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Anyone know how much Carroll is Actually on? 80k? 90k? 60-70k? 65k apparently Really doubt he's on that low of a wage. He was a 35 million transfer, if his agent has only negotiated 65K a week Carroll should have fired him. the fee was more that liverpool told chelsea they wanted 15m in cash, plus whatever carroll cost for torres not because they valued torres at 50m, or carroll at 35m had carroll cost 15m, torres wouldve cost 30m That makes no sense. They were negotiating with Newcastle for Carroll not Chelsea. Why would Chelsea agree a fee for Torres that they had no control over? If Liverpool had decided to buy Carroll for 80m knowing the Torres deal was going to cover it would Chelsea have been obliged to hand over 95m? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3te Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Anyone know how much Carroll is Actually on? 80k? 90k? 60-70k? 65k apparently Really doubt he's on that low of a wage. He was a 35 million transfer, if his agent has only negotiated 65K a week Carroll should have fired him. the fee was more that liverpool told chelsea they wanted 15m in cash, plus whatever carroll cost for torres not because they valued torres at 50m, or carroll at 35m had carroll cost 15m, torres wouldve cost 30m That makes no sense. They were negotiating with Newcastle for Carroll not Chelsea. Why would Chelsea agree a fee for Torres that they had no control over? If Liverpool had decided to buy Carroll for 80m knowing the Torres deal was going to cover it would Chelsea have been obliged to hand over 95m? it may make no sense to you, but that's exactly how it worked. liverpool said it, newcastle said it, and comolli said it the torres transfer was dependent on the carroll transfer. the carroll transfer needed to be agreed before the torres deal went through. chelsea said they agreed to liverpools terms, pool went and negotiated the carroll deal then told chelsea the final figure and both deals happened at the same time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8pints Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Ultimately, with his wages and our wage organisation this season, I don't think he'll come to us unless we clear out a vast amount of players. We still have no target man, maybe we won't need one, but it's always nice, in my opinion, to have all varieties of striker to choose from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villaglint Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Well KK on twitter (more reliable than most) reckons we are considering a bid for Carroll. I suppose that much has been obvious for a while or since Lambert's comments at least. One thing I would say is that if we do decide to bid for him I think we would only do so if the bid had a pretty reasonable chance of being successful. I think our club operates very differently to the Sullivan's and Golds of this world who always talk about big transfers that will change the world but never quite seem to be able to complete one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omariqy Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Yeah I saw that. He is pretty reliable. I would imagine that means we have enquired about him. I think we would only bid for him if we were confident he would want to come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KjParton Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 I'd have him if he cut his hair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts