Jump to content

CI

Established Members
  • Content Count

    15,322
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

CI last won the day on January 25 2013

CI had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

356 Excellent

About CI

  • Rank
    Legend

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I'm not wrong. You are . You need to backtrack and earn yourself a modicum of respect.
  2. So why did Ingham join in ? He had no previous input, just decides to wade in with the gang. My opinion is valid, mods can keep giving me points and the "gang" can keep posting for points. I will maintain my position , until I'm banned if needs be.
  3. Doesn't answer my question... What's the Q ?
  4. And it's a bullying culture
  5. You'll all get your way soon. I've been given 6 warning points for defending and debating my opinion. This site is like North Korea.
  6. It's not really been raised as a debating point before. Things have escalated monumentally since 32Red for example.
  7. I said "ok ?" And we were Debating Faulkners commercial skills. Nothing about ethics. Like I said pls put the whole thread up pls Yes, remember I provided the quote for you a short while ago and as I said it wasn't in a thread about Faulkner you are repeating yourself, I'm not going to keep doing. I've asked you to explain your change of stance, you've avoided the question, you can't do it. Nothing else I need to say. And I can't quote a whole thread can I and there really is no need. Actually there is. You have been selective to manipulate your own agenda.
  8. You really need to calm down. I'm not even sure why you're questioning ? What have you personally asked ?
  9. Calling it a little sanctimonious and hypocritical for a self-confessed gambler to have a problem with a gambling firm on the shirt is not point scoring. It's merely pointing out something that I thought was more than a little amusing. Now, carry on. Except he wasn't self confessed..... He was outed for the massive hypocrite he is. The very image of posting for effect and Internet ****-wittery. Out and out abuse keyboard warrior. I expect this to moderated How ****ing pathetic. You've been caught out for the pathetic wind up you are. Not very nice being on the receiving end of the mods is it as normally your silly games get others in trouble for calling you out. ****ing deal with it. Oh hello ? Who are you ? Part of the "gang" . What a pathetic attempt to join in ? Can I suggest you calm down a bit. Wow.
  10. I said "ok ?" And we were Debating Faulkners commercial skills. Nothing about ethics. Like I said pls put the whole thread up pls
  11. Calling it a little sanctimonious and hypocritical for a self-confessed gambler to have a problem with a gambling firm on the shirt is not point scoring. It's merely pointing out something that I thought was more than a little amusing. Now, carry on. Except he wasn't self confessed..... He was outed for the massive hypocrite he is. The very image of posting for effect and Internet ****-wittery. Out and out abuse keyboard warrior. I expect this to moderated
  12. As I thought . We were debating Faulkner purely on commercial terms. Ethics were not even on the table for debate and you know that.
  13. Please send a link to that thread so I can read it in full rather than selectively pull out snippets Please place the link below
  14. Because that thread we weren't debating the ethics of gambling. I think it was more about Faulkner. No doubt Trent and BOF are now furrowing through posts from 2011 to try and point score some more ;-)
  15. You said this already Yep because you seemed to skip over the points raised.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â