theunderstudy Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Why do tennis ball have the swirly S bit/join on them? It's the way they were stitched back in the day and I think the people who run tennis realised that the seam made the ball more aerodynamic and fly better (take note World Cup football manufacturers...) so when rules were introduced to standardise tennis ball design and behaviour they kept the S. Baseballs have the S too but they are still stitched. Wunderbar. Danke, mind at ease. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meath_Villan Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 where does all the fecking fluff come from that I pick out of my belly button Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frobisher Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 where does all the fecking fluff come from that I pick out of my belly button http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/lint/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Have any of my actions indirectly lead to the death of another human being? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowychap Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Have any of my actions indirectly lead to the death of another human being?Yes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villaajax Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I wondered why Gareth has disappeared again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Have any of my actions indirectly lead to the death of another human being? Yes. Can you tell me who? I'd like to apologise to their families. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarethRDR Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I wondered why Gareth has disappeared again. I never left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowychap Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Can you tell me who? I'd like to apologise to their families.I'm not sure that it would be appropriate to directly apologize for something done indirectly. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddywhack Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Plus, you might indirectly kill another 10 people by going to their house to apologise. Or you might if you don't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Plus, you might indirectly kill another 10 people by going to their house to apologise. Or you might if you don't. Arrrrrgh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFC_Hitz Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 One shaven nick, one extra kiss, who's to know? Not up to me, not up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amsterdam_Neil_D Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Since the Voyager missions were quite a success and one is still going from what I understand why don't we do this :- Make 1000 + Voyager type craft which are basically fired into the regions of the universe we think looks interesting (from a goldilocks type perspective). The change is that when these are built they are built to travel only and report back what they see, forget all that. Get them to be able to hit the surface of a planet and basically explode. Load em up with as much interesting organisms, bacteria and basically anything that currently does not get on these craft. Fire them out with the only task, find a planet , tell us where it is, get through the atmosphere and land spreading the earth type goodness (send something to see how its going in a few hundred years. Why ? Why not. What would it do, who knows, got to be better than looking at it all (Space) and well looking some more. This is our job to do IMO and who says its not ? Who decided not to do this, maybe something did similar with earth billions of years ago ? (Religion / I believe in god(s) and all that **** has no right to infringe on this as its a disease / illness of the mind and thus a personnel thing entirely IMO). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Since the Voyager missions were quite a success and one is still going from what I understand why don't we do this :- Make 1000 + Voyager type craft which are basically fired into the regions of the universe we think looks interesting (from a goldilocks type perspective). The change is that when these are built they are built to travel only and report back what they see, forget all that. Get them to be able to hit the surface of a planet and basically explode. Load em up with as much interesting organisms, bacteria and basically anything that currently does not get on these craft. Fire them out with the only task, find a planet , tell us where it is, get through the atmosphere and land spreading the earth type goodness (send something to see how its going in a few hundred years. Why ? Why not. What would it do, who knows, got to be better than looking at it all (Space) and well looking some more. This is our job to do IMO and who says its not ? Who decided not to do this, maybe something did similar with earth billions of years ago ? (Religion / I believe in god(s) and all that **** has no right to infringe on this as its a disease / illness of the mind and thus a personnel thing entirely IMO). I think all that is too long-term. Is it possible to hit planets from that distance? It would take 10,000s of years to reach the nearest star. Could be 100,000s or millions of years to reach a habitable planet. Nobody would fund it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amsterdam_Neil_D Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I see what you mean but the alternative is to sit on this rock waiting for it to die. I am thinking we should be pro-active in this area. The funding thing is a problem yet we waste billions on wars about religion and various gods that have never and will never exist so sending stuff around the universe is far more productive than what we are wasting on here anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I see what you mean but the alternative is to sit on this rock waiting for it to die. I am thinking we should be pro-active in this area. The funding thing is a problem yet we waste billions on wars about religion and various gods that have never and will never exist so sending stuff around the universe is far more productive than what we are wasting on here anyway. I'm all for exploration and I'm glad plans are being made to get to Mars. At the risk of being labelled a yoghurt knitter we need to sort out this planet because it is going to be **** pretty soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MakemineVanilla Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Have any of my actions indirectly lead to the death of another human being? A Bizarro version of Capra's It's a Wonderful Life would be interesting, where the George Bailey character finds out the damage he has done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 The smallest things can have a domino effect, we're probably all responsible for stuff that we can't begin to imagine, good and bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tegis Posted February 26, 2014 VT Supporter Share Posted February 26, 2014 Since the Voyager missions were quite a success and one is still going from what I understand why don't we do this :- Make 1000 + Voyager type craft which are basically fired into the regions of the universe we think looks interesting (from a goldilocks type perspective). The change is that when these are built they are built to travel only and report back what they see, forget all that. Get them to be able to hit the surface of a planet and basically explode. Load em up with as much interesting organisms, bacteria and basically anything that currently does not get on these craft. Fire them out with the only task, find a planet , tell us where it is, get through the atmosphere and land spreading the earth type goodness (send something to see how its going in a few hundred years. Why ? Why not. What would it do, who knows, got to be better than looking at it all (Space) and well looking some more. This is our job to do IMO and who says its not ? Who decided not to do this, maybe something did similar with earth billions of years ago ? (Religion / I believe in god(s) and all that **** has no right to infringe on this as its a disease / illness of the mind and thus a personnel thing entirely IMO). I think all that is too long-term. Is it possible to hit planets from that distance? It would take 10,000s of years to reach the nearest star. Could be 100,000s or millions of years to reach a habitable planet. Nobody would fund it. At Voyager speed it would take about 150 000 years to reach Alpha Centauri Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amsterdam_Neil_D Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I see what you mean but the alternative is to sit on this rock waiting for it to die. I am thinking we should be pro-active in this area. The funding thing is a problem yet we waste billions on wars about religion and various gods that have never and will never exist so sending stuff around the universe is far more productive than what we are wasting on here anyway. I'm all for exploration and I'm glad plans are being made to get to Mars. At the risk of being labelled a yoghurt knitter we need to sort out this planet because it is going to be **** pretty soon. Well it is for stuff we wonder about. I dont know what yoghurt knitter is ? Anyway, we don't have enough time or space to fix earth in time, that's what I am getting at and also. We will never find anything sitting on our hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts