PompeyVillan Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Stoke eh? Might do quite well there. He won't do well here because we do not deliver the ball into the box nearly enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omariqy Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 The sacrifice of Bent has to be made for the good of this club. Whether that is because of his wages and the need to rebuild or because of his rumoured negative influence in the club. Either way it has to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villan_007 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 The sacrifice of Bent has to be made for the good of this club. Whether that is because of his wages and the need to rebuild or because of his rumoured negative influence in the club. Either way it has to happen. You hearing it's done then mate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillaForever1970 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 slagging off bents performance last night when he was the best player shows how unbalanced your opinion is of him, if he had played shit or worse than the rest fair enough Thanks for all that, I didn't slag off his performance from last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam_ Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 i dont think one person is saying bent is like messi apart from you? last night first half bent was the best villa player by a country mile, benteke looked shit second half lambert swaps the team around tactically but then takes off the one player who can thrive on that formation nzog should have come off for gabby at half time but bent should have stayed on as he was the sharpest forward and looked up for it but yet again clueless lambert takes him off and will again claim he cant play benteke and bent together up front. he cant if he keeps playing shit formations and shit tactics, you may as well have no one up front with those shit tactics slagging off bents performance last night when he was the best player shows how unbalanced your opinion is of him, if he had played shit or worse than the rest fair enough What game were you watching?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicMushroom Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 So how much do we lose on him, if this Stoke thing is true? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulver Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 It doesn't have to happen. Randy could quite easily pull 20m out of his current 1.2 billion fortune and spend that instead It's his baby, it's his mess, and it's his responsibility to run his ship better. To claim we 'have' to sell someone to buy others, is the biggest con trick fallen for in the history of this club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBM Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 that makes complete sense, to sell one of our best players, our club record signing to one of our league rivals... i hate this club more everyday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 that makes complete sense, to sell one of our best players, our club record signing to one of our league rivals... i hate this club more everyday League Rivals? They're 10 points ahead of us. That and Bent does **** all right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_John_10 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Shame he joined a team that was selling all good players. Also a shame we need to sell him in order to buy others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBM Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 somebody clearly has the hump with bent, on wiki it says he plays for "Sunderland R&D Outbound Team" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacketspuds Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 The sacrifice of Bent has to be made for the good of this club. That's some crazy shit mate. Can't we just sell him? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Lambert truly showed Bent up last night playing him in that first half formation. I guarantee if he played in the second half 442 with wingers he would have scored at least 1. Its like Lambert did it on purpose so we would not be bothered if he were to go in the next 48 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacketspuds Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Lambert truly showed Bent up last night playing him in that first half formation. I guarantee if he played in the second half 442 with wingers he would have scored at least 1. Its like Lambert did it on purpose so we would not be bothered if he were to go in the next 48 hours. Just out of pure coincidence last night was Bent's 49th PL appearance. IMO Lambert took a chance on Bent as he knew he was going anyway, then decided to sub him off when it clearly wasn't working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 It doesn't have to happen. Randy could quite easily pull 20m out of his current 1.2 billion fortune and spend that instead It's his baby, it's his mess, and it's his responsibility to run his ship better. To claim we 'have' to sell someone to buy others, is the biggest con trick fallen for in the history of this club. It's not a con trick, it's his money. He doesn't have to spend a penny on the football club if he doesn't want to, it's not like he hasn't pumped in a fortune already. The money tap does have to stop somewhere though you know. He has decided the line has been drawn and the club has to run on it's own income. That is fair enough, we have no right to expect any more money. That is something spoilt children demand. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshVilla Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 League Rivals? They're 10 points ahead of us. That and Bent does **** all right now. We still have to play them in our relegation run in I guarantee if he signs for Stoke he will score a brace against us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted January 30, 2013 Moderator Share Posted January 30, 2013 He isn't going to Stoke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorset77Villa Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Stoke fans on the forums aren't happy about this either, would Kenwyne Jones do a better job for us with Tekkers? If a swap is on i think it is definitely a positive move Thanks for the ups and mostly downs DB! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3te Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 He isn't going to Stoke. is he going anywhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omariqy Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 He isn't going to Stoke. Who to Trent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts