dont_do_it_doug. Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Pretty much everyone else had all already ignored your theory as nonsense without needing to show their working out. You mentioned at least 4/5 times that you wouldn't be surprised if it were true before only 1 page ago saying it can't be true, because surely Man City could just deny it. Which by the way, wouldn't make a difference to such a theory now if there were any shred of possibility it was viable, the work has already been done. A denial from Man City now wouldn't change a thing. It's still bollocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arj Guy Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 http://youtube.com/watch?v=cK58XgKV2II 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jareth Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 I'm always coming up with theories me and disproving them then coming up with more theories - it's a gift. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Pretty much everyone else had all already ignored your theory as nonsense without needing to show their working out. You mentioned at least 4/5 times that you wouldn't be surprised if it were true before only 1 page ago saying it can't be true, because surely Man City could just deny it. Which by the way, wouldn't make a difference to such a theory now if there were any shred of possibility it was viable, the work has already been done. A denial from Man City now wouldn't change a thing. It's still bollocks. How do you know that pretty much everyone else had ignored my theory? You certainly don't seem to have ignored it yourself. And actually if City did come out and deny they were ever interested, it would make a difference, but of course we know they won't, because they were interested. And yes it's bollocks, like I already proved. I also said about 4/5 times that it's not something I'm arguing as a fact.Besides what an utterly stupid thing to argue about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PieFacE Posted July 12, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted July 12, 2015 Just saw an interview with Ashley Westwood in Portugal saying as far as any of the players were aware he was never going anywhere. He spoke with them yesterday and said he wasnt going anywhere. Where did you see this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 (edited) Anyway well done to Delph for sticking around. Edited July 12, 2015 by useless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedClaretAndBlue Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Just saw an interview with Ashley Westwood in Portugal saying as far as any of the players were aware he was never going anywhere. He spoke with them yesterday and said he wasnt going anywhere. Where did you see this? On SSN last night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont_do_it_doug. Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Pretty much everyone else had all already ignored your theory as nonsense without needing to show their working out. You mentioned at least 4/5 times that you wouldn't be surprised if it were true before only 1 page ago saying it can't be true, because surely Man City could just deny it. Which by the way, wouldn't make a difference to such a theory now if there were any shred of possibility it was viable, the work has already been done. A denial from Man City now wouldn't change a thing. It's still bollocks. How do you know that pretty much everyone else had ignored my theory? You certainly don't seem to have ignored it yourself. And actually if City did come out and deny they were ever interested, it would make a difference, but of course we know they won't, because they were interested. And yes it's bollocks, like I already proved. I also said about 4/5 times that it's not something I'm arguing as a fact. Besides what an utterly stupid thing to argue about. It's hard to ignore when you've made such a big fuss about it What difference would it make? I'm trying to help you out here, because in an argument with yourself you've failed to win. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Pretty much everyone else had all already ignored your theory as nonsense without needing to show their working out. You mentioned at least 4/5 times that you wouldn't be surprised if it were true before only 1 page ago saying it can't be true, because surely Man City could just deny it. Which by the way, wouldn't make a difference to such a theory now if there were any shred of possibility it was viable, the work has already been done. A denial from Man City now wouldn't change a thing. It's still bollocks. Caught up in the hype - as was I. Don't believe the hype...don't don't don't believe the hype! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumstopdogs Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Wouldn't have blamed Delph if he wanted to join City but now that move is seemingly over I am very pleased he will (probably!) be here for this season. Delph you legend! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMAICAN-VILLAN Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Just saw an interview with Ashley Westwood in Portugal saying as far as any of the players were aware he was never going anywhere. He spoke with them yesterday and said he wasnt going anywhere. Where did you see this? On SSN last night So he was just having a chat with Micah about Man City for the hell of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Pretty much everyone else had all already ignored your theory as nonsense without needing to show their working out. You mentioned at least 4/5 times that you wouldn't be surprised if it were true before only 1 page ago saying it can't be true, because surely Man City could just deny it. Which by the way, wouldn't make a difference to such a theory now if there were any shred of possibility it was viable, the work has already been done. A denial from Man City now wouldn't change a thing. It's still bollocks. How do you know that pretty much everyone else had ignored my theory? You certainly don't seem to have ignored it yourself. And actually if City did come out and deny they were ever interested, it would make a difference, but of course we know they won't, because they were interested. And yes it's bollocks, like I already proved. I also said about 4/5 times that it's not something I'm arguing as a fact. Besides what an utterly stupid thing to argue about. It's hard to ignore when you've made such a big fuss about it What difference would it make? I'm trying to help you out here, because in an argument with yourself you've failed to win. No offence but you can come across as quite condescending at times. And I'm not arguing with anyone least of all myself. I initially said I wouldn't be surprised if the whole thing was a PR stunt, then I clarified that it's not something I'm arguing as a fact. And later on I put forth my reasoning as to why the PR stunt idea was likely to be untrue. Not sure what's wrong with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Why would this be a PR stunt alienating the fans 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 (edited) RIght this was a limited edition post, feel free to delete it. Edited July 12, 2015 by useless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazvfc Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 I don't think he actually flew to the states, he was flying between Olbia and Birmingham. Apparently he went back and forth several times. Would be nice to think he was taking Delph to meet the new owner, but that's probably too much wishful well thinking. F***k me Lerner needs a jet to fly to Sandwell to go to the Olbian? Cheaper and easier getting the 74 from city centre! More money than sense me thinks 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont_do_it_doug. Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Pretty much everyone else had all already ignored your theory as nonsense without needing to show their working out. You mentioned at least 4/5 times that you wouldn't be surprised if it were true before only 1 page ago saying it can't be true, because surely Man City could just deny it. Which by the way, wouldn't make a difference to such a theory now if there were any shred of possibility it was viable, the work has already been done. A denial from Man City now wouldn't change a thing. It's still bollocks. How do you know that pretty much everyone else had ignored my theory? You certainly don't seem to have ignored it yourself. And actually if City did come out and deny they were ever interested, it would make a difference, but of course we know they won't, because they were interested. And yes it's bollocks, like I already proved. I also said about 4/5 times that it's not something I'm arguing as a fact. Besides what an utterly stupid thing to argue about. It's hard to ignore when you've made such a big fuss about it What difference would it make? I'm trying to help you out here, because in an argument with yourself you've failed to win. No offence but you can come across as quite condescending at times. And I'm not arguing with anyone least of all myself. I initially said I wouldn't be surprised if the whole thing was a PR stunt, then I clarified that it's not something I'm arguing as a fact. And later on I put forth my reasoning as to why the PR stunt idea was likely to be untrue. Not sure what's wrong with that. Absolutely none taken. In fact, if putting forward clear and forthright reasons why somebody is wrong is condescending then it is completely intentional. You may not have noticed this but I don't care what people on this forum think of me, if you don't like it up ya we have an ignore function Like I said, your reasons for dispelling your own myth were ill thought out. IF it were true that this were a PR stunt bought about by the club then their work is already done. Perhaps a statement by Man City might dilute that feeling a little, but they would still consider it job done. Either way, the risk perhaps would have been worth the reward to the PR department. Of course, it's not a PR stunt. There's plenty of actual evidence to support that assertion. My point was that your reasoning was not sound and I'm sorry that you don't like that I pointed this out to you, but this is a public FORUM. If you have an issue with your opinions being challenged, which seems to be a recurring theme on VT of late, reserve them for your blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a m ole Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 I don't think he actually flew to the states, he was flying between Olbia and Birmingham. Apparently he went back and forth several times. Would be nice to think he was taking Delph to meet the new owner, but that's probably too much wishful well thinking. F***k me Lerner needs a jet to fly to Sandwell to go to the Olbian? Cheaper and easier getting the 74 from city centre! More money than sense me thinks West Bromwich is much more beautiful from 35,000 feet 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Pretty much everyone else had all already ignored your theory as nonsense without needing to show their working out. You mentioned at least 4/5 times that you wouldn't be surprised if it were true before only 1 page ago saying it can't be true, because surely Man City could just deny it. Which by the way, wouldn't make a difference to such a theory now if there were any shred of possibility it was viable, the work has already been done. A denial from Man City now wouldn't change a thing. It's still bollocks. How do you know that pretty much everyone else had ignored my theory? You certainly don't seem to have ignored it yourself. And actually if City did come out and deny they were ever interested, it would make a difference, but of course we know they won't, because they were interested. And yes it's bollocks, like I already proved. I also said about 4/5 times that it's not something I'm arguing as a fact. Besides what an utterly stupid thing to argue about. It's hard to ignore when you've made such a big fuss about it What difference would it make? I'm trying to help you out here, because in an argument with yourself you've failed to win. No offence but you can come across as quite condescending at times. And I'm not arguing with anyone least of all myself. I initially said I wouldn't be surprised if the whole thing was a PR stunt, then I clarified that it's not something I'm arguing as a fact. And later on I put forth my reasoning as to why the PR stunt idea was likely to be untrue. Not sure what's wrong with that. Absolutely none taken. In fact, if putting forward clear and forthright reasons why somebody is wrong is condescending then it is completely intentional. You may not have noticed this but I don't care what people on this forum think of me, if you don't like it up ya we have an ignore function Like I said, your reasons for dispelling your own myth were ill thought out. IF it were true that this were a PR stunt bought about by the club then their work is already done. Perhaps a statement by Man City might dilute that feeling a little, but they would still consider it job done. Either way, the risk perhaps would have been worth the reward to the PR department. Of course, it's not a PR stunt. There's plenty of actual evidence to support that assertion. My point was that your reasoning was not sound and I'm sorry that you don't like that I pointed this out to you, but this is a public FORUM. If you have an issue with your opinions being challenged, which seems to be a recurring theme on VT of late, reserve them for your blog. you say no offence taken but I don't believe that going from the tone of your post, so once again I didn't really mean anything by it, and it's probably partly my own fault anyway, and I think it's a good thing that you don't care what people think of you. You haven't put any forward clear and forthright reasons why I'm wrong. Probably because I haven't myself said that I'm right about anything, as I'm not actually arguing any points. I've never said that it's a PR stunt, and I haven't tried to argue any ideas in that direction. And where did I say that I didn't like you pointing out stuff to me? As for my opinions being challenged, being a recurring theme isn't that the same for you? Considering your the one to keep running to the 'things that piss you off thread' to complain about on topic, everytime someone happens to disagree with you. I haven't got a clue why your making such a big fuss over this, once again all I did was to say that It wouldn't surprise me if this was a PR stunt. I then said why I thought that idea was stupid. Because I said I was the one to disaprove the theory, you have to be the big hereo and step in to prove me wrong? It was meant to be half comical. And I don't use the ignore button, if a post doesn't interest me I can easily not read it. I don't have a blog either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
limpid Posted July 12, 2015 Administrator Share Posted July 12, 2015 Mat Kendrick @MatKendrick 7h7 hours ago He was due to join Man City, numerous journalists were briefed to that end, but the move has now been shelved. Things change. Who was briefed and by whom? It's kind of important if we're to assess whether the journalists were acting reasonably. Also wtf does "due ro join" mean? That's new - the furthest any journo took the story was he was going for a medical. I think they talked to Doris. Doris told them what her friend read on twitter. Doris out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont_do_it_doug. Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Useless - no worries. Agree to disagree. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts