birdistheword Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 10 minutes ago, The_Steve said: It’s really not that different from Sam Lee. The needle hasn’t shifted at all. Absolutely nothing changed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyblade Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 1 minute ago, Mantis said: I'm still quite confident he'll stay, just because I believe NSWE understand how central Jack is to their ambitions. Only way they'd accept is if City came in with of an offer of something like £150m, which I just do not think they'll do. It'd be almost triple their transfer record. Don't think they want Jack that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderPower_14 Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 I just want it done either way. I'm getting weary of Grealish doomscrolling but I can't help myself. I 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a m ole Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Just now, foreveryoung said: I'm with you. In reality is Kane worth more, maybe cause he is a striker? I'm not so sure, he certainly don't have the following jack has. NWSE will be thinking of the marketing power jack has, yes he is a quality footballer, but he is gonna make a club a lot of money over the seasons with his following, that's worth £50m on it's own I've no doubt. For me he is £120m at least. It’s simple for me, if there’s no clause then he’s contracted to us for another 4 years. We can still get the same price (£80-100m) in 2 years time when his contract is in danger of running out providing he doesn’t sign a new one. The offer has to be his value to us as a club over the next 2 years plus that figure. Not that they’d ever want to pay it, but that figure is what, £200m? If there’s nothing forcing us to sell then we shouldn’t be agreeing on anything that isn’t absolutely crazy. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eastie Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Keyblade said: If there is a release clause, what is there to negotiate then? Either trigger it or jog on. Exactly - they’d probs try their luck but they’d be well aware of the situation to even be in for him - certainly no way they’d pay over £100m but remember it’s what jacks value may have been a year ago when he signed the deal - obviously his value has risen in the last year but I’d expect a year ago a clause of £100m to be realistic - percy said he believed there was a substantial release clause in his article wgich I posted on page 2700 of the thread so I’d be very surprised if under £100m my feeling is city will prioritise a striker now Edited July 29, 2021 by Eastie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M_Afro Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 He is not going anywhere. We hold all the cards. This will not happen. I am 100% certain of that fact. No in the know just good basic common sense. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyblade Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 2 minutes ago, a m ole said: It’s simple for me, if there’s no clause then he’s contracted to us for another 4 years. We can still get the same price (£80-100m) in 2 years time when his contract is in danger of running out providing he doesn’t sign a new one. The offer has to be his value to us as a club over the next 2 years plus that figure. Not that they’d ever want to pay it, but that figure is what, £200m? If there’s nothing forcing us to sell then we shouldn’t be agreeing on anything that isn’t absolutely crazy. Yeah I'd be disappointed if NSWE accepted anything in the range of the low to mid 100's. They can get that next year or even the year after. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villanmac Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 He's worth a lot lot more to Aston Villa then he is to Man City hence why there should be an impasse when it comes to negotiating a fee. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KAZZAM Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Romano doesn't have a clue. Just trying to say 'Something' so it looks like he 'knows'. If there's no release cause he's not for sale that should be Villa's stance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JONESYVILLA Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Just now, Keyblade said: Yeah I'd be disappointed if NSWE accepted anything in the range of the low to mid 100's. They can get that next year or even the year after. You cash out when your assets are at their most valuable, his stock is high now off the back of a few appearances at the Euros, not so much if his shins give again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delphinho123 Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 14 minutes ago, Jas10 said: I find this very interesting. It basically assumes that there isn’t a release clause because there would not be any need for negotiation if it existed. It’s worded as if Jack has said he’s happy with what Man City have offered and would like to go, but won’t force a move unless the price on his head is met. Here’s an interesting thought. I wonder if NSWE and the management team actually think they can improve the team if Man City meet a specific fee for the player? Whether we like it or not, every player has his price. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyblade Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Just now, JONESYVILLA said: You cash out when your assets are at their most valuable, his stock is high now off the back of a few appearances at the Euros, not so much if his shins give again. His stock is only going to keep rising, shin splints and all 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Odds have well dropped on him staying, evens now, an man City gone back up, not that it means much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post villa4europe Posted July 29, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 29, 2021 "negotiations won't take long" Because we've told them to **** off... 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beastmix Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 (edited) Fairly confident he'll sign a new deal with us. Wouldn't surprise me if a number of our 'big name' incomings this summer hinge on him staying too (like, they're verbally agreed with the caveat of Jack staying), hence why there's not been much action in the past few weeks. Edited July 29, 2021 by Beastmix 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delphinho123 Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 8 minutes ago, a m ole said: It’s simple for me, if there’s no clause then he’s contracted to us for another 4 years. We can still get the same price (£80-100m) in 2 years time when his contract is in danger of running out providing he doesn’t sign a new one. The offer has to be his value to us as a club over the next 2 years plus that figure. Not that they’d ever want to pay it, but that figure is what, £200m? If there’s nothing forcing us to sell then we shouldn’t be agreeing on anything that isn’t absolutely crazy. Agreed but if they bid anything over 120m they’ll get their man. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumblerseven Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 (edited) I disagree with some of you guys that club almost should force him to complete his deal. I believe 100% that there is gentlemens agreemet with jack and club. Jack stayed in championship with us. Helped to promote us. Hes god damn mister villa. In my view hes done enough to get whatever he demands. If he wants to leave let him go cry and deal with it. But dont even think to act with him in bad faith dont start waving a that 5year deal in front of his nose..Just let him go Edited July 29, 2021 by Tumblerseven 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awol Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Just now, JONESYVILLA said: You cash out when your assets are at their most valuable, his stock is high now off the back of a few appearances at the Euros, not so much if his shins give again. You worry about what’s going to happen to your club now the courts have ordered all the information on Citeh’s finances to be handed over. Worry about that, not trolling fans of other clubs. I’ll be laughing my cock off when the hammer falls on the plastic palace that is Manchester City FC. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommo_b Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 1 minute ago, Tumblerseven said: I disagree with some of you guys that club almost should force him to complete his deal. I believe 100% that there is gentlemens agreemet with jack and club. Jack stayed in championship with us. Helped to promote us. Hes god damn mister villa. In my view hes done enough to get whatever he demands. If he wants to leave let him go cry and deal with it. But dont even think to act with him in bad faith dont start waving a that 5year deal in front of his nose..Just let him go Good thing is he doesn’t want to go then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JONESYVILLA Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Just now, Awol said: You worry about what’s going to happen to your club now the courts have ordered all the information on Citeh’s finances to be handed over. Worry about that, not trolling fans of other clubs. I’ll be laughing my cock off when the hammer falls on the plastic palace that is Manchester City FC. I would be laughing too if Man Citys wheels fell off, not sure why people get wound up when someone has a different view to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts