Jump to content

The Film Thread


DeadlyDirk

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, villa4europe said:

went to watch gone baby gone again but after 2 minutes i remembered the end and couldnt be bothered

watched wolf of wall street for the 1st time since the cinema, loved it, its just a brilliant mad film

also watched arrival, not sure why its taken me so long to watch, very very good, very clever, a film about aliens that isnt really about aliens at all

and finally tomb raider...its a bit shit, offers nothing new or really that interesting, shoe horns in bits like the bow and arrow because they're cool in the game, the whole thing just never feels very real or grounded

Arrival is one of my favourite films of recent times. Absolutely love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday I watched "The Blindside". A pretty cheesy and predictable film about Michael Oher. True story. Pretty entertaining to be honest but people might be put off by the deep south american-ness of it all.

I also watched "The Cleveland Abductions", film version of those 3 girls that were kidnapped for 13 years and eventually found. Pretty good, but had a B Movie feel throughout the whole thing. Only 90 minutes so worth a watch but nothing groundbreaking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sometimes feel like I’m the only person that feels completely indifferent to The Wolf on Wall Street.

I’m sure I thought it had some good bits, good performances. But I can only remember a couple of things about it. My abiding memory of it is that it’s way too long and I just didn’t care by the end of it. But it’s provided it’s fair share of memes and gifs to give it it’s due.

Edit - apparently it’s The Wolf OF Wall Street not “on”.

Edited by Shropshire Lad
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Wolf of Wall Street is excellent. We've watched it literally 10 times and still end up laughing hysterically at it. The country club scene is obscenely stupiy but it's intensely funny.

It isn't universally liked, a lot of people think it draws the wrong line between glorifying Belfort and laughing at how absurd he and his life was. I don't think this is the case, the entire film is effectively Belfort explaining that he's a word removed, and then explaining why he's a word removed, and showing what being a word removed got him ultimately. It also subtly criticises the world he was in - the scene with McConaughey is effectively 10 minutes of saying the financial world is full of parasites and run on bullshit.

It's excellent.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Shropshire Lad said:

I sometimes feel like I’m the only person that feels completely indifferent to The Wolf on Wall Street.

I’m sure I thought it had some good bits, good performances. But I can only remember a couple of things about it. My abiding memory of it is that it’s way too long and I just didn’t care by the end of it. But it’s provided it’s fair share of memes and gifs to give it it’s due.

Edit - apparently it’s The Wolf OF Wall Street not “on”.

Me too, in fact I'd go as far to say that I really disliked it.  Just not my cup of tea really.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sharkyvilla said:

Me too, in fact I'd go as far to say that I really disliked it.  Just not my cup of tea really.

And 3rded. One of those loved film that I didn't enjoy very much.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, OutByEaster? said:

Goodfellas. Goodfella in Las Vegas. Goodfellas in banks. I think sometimes Scorsese just wants to tell the same story in a different setting because he knows he can do it with a fag on.

When I posted about Wolf of Wall Street, I was thinking about how my views on that film conflicts with my views on Goodfellas too. I love Goodfellas, it’s one of my all time favourites and the little I can remember of Wolf... I concede there are certain parallels that can be drawn with Goodfellas. 

Maybe that’s partly it, like I’d seen the rise and fall of one Scorsese anti hero and this was a kinda retread of it but in a different, frankly less interesting setting. I know we’re not meant to like the Belfont character, but I’m never rooting for him or I just don’t care about what happens to him or his dreadful friends. 

Despite everything that he’s involved with, I do care about Henry Hill’s fate in Goodfellas and what happens to his wife and kids. Even though his world and what he does is more reprehensible than Wall Street, he himself is more decent and easier to root for, relatively speaking, if that makes sense.

Not arsed about Casino. Among others things that pale in comparison the one that sticks out to me is the voice over work done by Ray Liotta and Lorraine Bracco in Goodfellas utterly wipes the floor with De Niro and Pesci in Casino.

Plus the soundtrack to Goodfellas is ****ing brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, tonyh29 said:

its got me entriqued enough to look into getting a biography of them as there is clearly a very interesting life story there with the pair of them

Not sure there are may good ones so do your research. Cousin is a huge fan of theirs and has piles of L&H stuff but most of the books are either crap or just about the movies.

Laurel & Hardy: The Magic Behind the Movies (Randy Skretvedt) and/or Stan and Ollie: The Roots Of Comedy (Simon Louvish) are probably 2 of the better ones but they can be expensive, especially the magic behind the movies which will probably set you back £50-100 for an average condition one. There was a new one out a couple of years back (another nice mess) but it's only about 100 pages which is pathetic really  so watch out/avoid that one if you're shopping around online

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 13/01/2019 at 22:22, HanoiVillan said:

 

The film stars Jean Dujardin, who my wife and I have liked ever since watching the 'OSS 117' films. Obviously he got his Oscar for 'The Artist', but a Hollywood career never quite seemed to happen, and this is very much home turf, in which he returns to playing a dashing-but-conceited pompous fool who thinks he's God's gift to everyone but is actually an enormous pain in arse. There's some very funny jokes, some over-the-top acting, the last four or five shots of the film are priceless in their simplicity. 

 

I read at the time that he only started to study English around the time The Artist came out so he is probably not so confident maybe for Hollywood roles even though he was in a few though never as major character

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched 'Unbreakable' and 'Split' over the past two nights in anticipation of 'Glass'
First time watching Split and a long overdue rewatch of Unbreakable but they are both so good. Not really a fan of superhero movies in general but I really enjoy this series

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â