blandy Posted January 17, 2022 Author Moderator Share Posted January 17, 2022 36 minutes ago, Genie said: If it’s intentional then it’s quite clever. it's intentional alright. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seat68 Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 Regardless of the health of the cat being slammed on the table, blue ticks are talking about the BBC and not parties. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Silvers Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 4 minutes ago, Seat68 said: Regardless of the health of the cat being slammed on the table, blue ticks are talking about the BBC and not parties. If only they were as good at everything else as they are at being devious. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rds1983 Posted January 17, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted January 17, 2022 2 hours ago, mjmooney said: First they came for the buses and railways And I did not speak out, because I had a car Then they came for the BBC And I did not speak out, because I had Netflix Then they came for the NHS... And I did not speak out, because I had Bupa. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fun Factory Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 Just sick of this scum of a government being in charge for 12 years now. 12 years. In the last 40 odd years the Tories have been in overall or coalition rule for nearly three quarters of it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xann Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 The Welsh and Scottish executive take the SAGE meetings much more seriously than the Tories. Sturgeon and co carefully listen to what the scientists have to say, and will ask for clarification on points they don't understand fully. Conversely, the English SAGE meetings are much more chaotic. Fat, absentee, Brexit prick Boris swerves them. That leaves the likes of Raab and Gove to attend, and they argue with the scientists 5 hours ago, The Fun Factory said: The BBC now also has to fund the entire world service section which is very important piece of 'soft power' this country has. Should the cuts go ahead? Rather than lose it, the BBC contingency plan is to carry ad traffic on the World Service Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Silvers Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choffer Posted January 17, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted January 17, 2022 Is there a more loathsome politician than Dorries? She is a venal triumph of self-confidence over ability. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bannedfromHandV Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 11 minutes ago, choffer said: Is there a more loathsome politician than Dorries? She is a venal triumph of self-confidence over ability. She’s a legitimate Katie Hopkins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted January 17, 2022 Moderator Share Posted January 17, 2022 49 minutes ago, choffer said: Is there a more loathsome politician than Dorries? She is a venal triumph of self-confidence over ability. With very few exceptions you just described most Tory MPs, she's bad, there's no doubts about that but there are worse. Boris Johnson for starters. Michael Gove... I was going to do a list but the whole bloody lot of them are over-confident talentless prats 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chindie Posted January 17, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted January 17, 2022 Dorries is one of the more loathsome as a toadie to the more despicable figures. There's something you can almost begrudgingly respect about the scum at the top, the words removed that follow them around sniffing their farts for a taste of power are completely without any merit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted January 17, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted January 17, 2022 1 hour ago, Chindie said: Dorries is one of the more loathsome as a toadie to the more despicable figures. There's something you can almost begrudgingly respect about the scum at the top, the words removed that follow them around sniffing their farts for a taste of power are completely without any merit. As I've previously mentioned, my local MP (Stuart Andrew) has spent the last three years surgically attached to Boris Johnson's arsehole (not a slur on the fact that he happens to be gay, btw). Every time Boris appeared on TV, there was SA, hovering around fawningly. Suddenly, he's nowhere to be seen. He'll be in a crisis of indecision over who to suck up to, now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted January 17, 2022 Moderator Share Posted January 17, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted January 17, 2022 Moderator Share Posted January 17, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 Just now, bickster said: It’s just never ending isn’t it. I’m furious Starmer didn’t ask him to declare all of his lockdown breaches in PMQ’s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted January 17, 2022 Moderator Share Posted January 17, 2022 Just for a bit of fun, usual caveats apply (polls, models blah) So first of all I took the latest Redfield Wilton Poll figures... And then I put them into the election predicting thingy at electoralcalculus.co.uk but the amusing thing is to look at the list of casualties it produces amongst The Tories. Say bye to...Graham Brady, Steven Baker, Ben Wallace, Peter Bone, Grant Shapps, Alun Cairns, Ester McVey (again), Jacob Rees-Mogg, Liam Fox, Daniel Kawcynski, Natalie Elphicke, Iain Duncan Smith, George Eustace, Tobias Ellwood, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, Lee Anderson and best of all the big dog himself, Boris Johnson It also highlights how many Tory MPs there are that I've never bloody heard of. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 That prediction gives the SNP 59 of the, er checks notes, 59 Scottish MP’s. Game over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted January 17, 2022 Moderator Share Posted January 17, 2022 10 minutes ago, chrisp65 said: That prediction gives the SNP 59 of the, er checks notes, 59 Scottish MP’s. Game over. Yep, it does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanBalaban Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 No arguments here... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts