Jump to content

PauloBarnesi

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Genie said:

I really hate this casual fan labelling of managers struggling as “dinosaurs”, like they know what his management and coaching style is and have a broad enough knowledge to be able to form a comparable opinion.

In Moyes case I comes from his short Man U stint at I imagine.

Quote

Moyes is a 'dinosaur': Jurassic training regime is why Van Persie is injured, claims Dutch coach

By James Andrew for MailOnline

PUBLISHED: 08:30 GMT, 25 July 2013 | UPDATED: 11:49 GMT, 25 July 2013

David Moyes has been called a 'dinosaur' and his coaching methods have been labelled as prehistoric and the reason behind Robin van Persie’s injury concerns.

A leading Dutch fitness specialist has called into question Moyes’ training regime and believes Van Persie being taken off at half-time during United’s friendly in Japan on Tuesday because he had experienced tightness in a thigh was down to the new United boss.

Moyes said taking the striker off was pre­cautionary and the striker has since been given the all clear to continue on the tour.
 

 
 

Prehistoric: David Moyes' training regime has been criticised by a Dutch fitness coach

But Raymond Verheijen, who has worked with Barcelona, Chelsea, Manchester City and worked with Gary Speed at Wales among others and has a reputation for being outspoken, hit out at the Scot.

Writing on his Twitter account, Verheijin noted that Moyes had previously said United had ‘overtrained’ Van Persie at the start of pre-season.

 

Too hard? Robin Van Persie was taken off as a precaution

He wrote: 'In Sydney Moyes said: ‘We’ve overtrained Robin this week to build up his fitness’. [In Japan] he picked up muscle injury. It really makes you wonder how these prehistoric training methods can still take place at the highest level.

 

'The only way to solve this problem in Jurassic Park is to improve education of these dinosaur coaches, fitness clowns & scientific cowboys.

 
 

Concern: Van Persie was taken off at half time

'All over the world in pre-season you see the pattern ‘overtraining-fatigue-injuries’. Always avoid accumulation of fatigue in pre-season.

'But as long as most dinosaurs are still in denial & ignore how things develop in other countries, nothing will ever change in Jurassic Park. Obviously, players like RVP should learn to protect themselves better against ‘overtraining’ & ‘punishing training’.'

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2377498/David-Moyes-training-labelled-prehistoric-Dutch-fitness-coach.html

The players at Man U also seemed to hate his training methods from what I remember.

 

 

Edited by sne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sne said:

In Moyes case I comes from his short Man U stint at I imagine.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2377498/David-Moyes-training-labelled-prehistoric-Dutch-fitness-coach.html

The players at Man U also seemed to hate his training methods from what I remember.

 

 

RVP was a sick note pretty much his entire career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Genie said:

I really hate this casual fan labelling of managers struggling as “dinosaurs”, like they know what his management and coaching style is and have a broad enough knowledge to be able to form a comparable opinion.

Think Sne covred that ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Zatman said:

Was he just in right place at Everton or what has happened. He looks nothing like that manager and he looks like he lost his fire after United

The spell at Man. United broke him. He realised he wasn't going to manage at those heights again because he simply was out of his depth.

Been going through the motions since and this is continuing at West Ham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

Mayor Sadiq Khan to take control of London Stadium

Last Updated: 01/12/17 11:36am

Mayor Sadiq Khan will take control of the London Stadium

The mayor of London Sadiq Khan has taken over control of the Olympic Stadium after a report revealed the deal with West Ham represents poor value to taxpayers.

The Moore Stephens report reveals there was a board meeting in 2016 where it was looked at whether to sell, close or re-tender for the West Ham contract.

The investigation was commissioned by the mayor in November after it was revealed that stadium costs had soared from £429m, which was how much the stadium cost to build, to £752m following the transformation process.

The original cost of the transformation was £154m but that rose to £270m in 2015 due to the complicated roof structure, and a further £51m of taxpayers money was needed for issues such as retractable seating.

A report said stadium deal with West Ham was poor value for taxpayers

The report concluded that the deal with West Ham was "onerous" and the decisions to transform the stadium and to accept the terms of West Ham's second bid as anchor tenants were made based on incorrect financial estimates and a failure to fully understand or investigate the commercial risks to the taxpayer.

It is also forecast the stadium will lose £24m in 2017-18.

The mayor will now take control of the Stadium in order to renegotiate deals and minimise ongoing losses.

 

Clicky

I still cant believe we are funding this for West Ham. What a complete and utter joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It always amazes me how shit this country is as budgeting for stuff like this. Wasn't Wembley years delayed and well over budget? Same wth HS2

Whatever the initial quote is - just treble it!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swansea has Stoke, West Brom, and City. Swansea can probably get a win in there. Stoke and West Brom aren't doing that well.

Palace have Bournemouth, Watford, and West brom. If Palace can't get a win in those 3, then they are surely going down.

West Ham have City, Chelsea, and Arsenal. Can't see them even getting a point. 

West Ham could be bottom of the table mid December. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Czechlad said:

Swansea has Stoke, West Brom, and City. Swansea can probably get a win in there. Stoke and West Brom aren't doing that well.

Palace have Bournemouth, Watford, and West brom. If Palace can't get a win in those 3, then they are surely going down.

West Ham have City, Chelsea, and Arsenal. Can't see them even getting a point. 

West Ham could be bottom of the table mid December. 

Good :D

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Czechlad said:

Swansea has Stoke, West Brom, and City. Swansea can probably get a win in there. Stoke and West Brom aren't doing that well.

Palace have Bournemouth, Watford, and West brom. If Palace can't get a win in those 3, then they are surely going down.

West Ham have City, Chelsea, and Arsenal. Can't see them even getting a point. 

West Ham could be bottom of the table mid December. 

200.webp#8-grid1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing like this surprises me any more, especially when some of our finest MP's are involved. 

Absolute scandal that costs almost doubled to make it all nice and cosy for them, who the f**k sits there and thinks ....o yeah that sounds about right!!

Im guessing there is no break clauses?

Edited by leighavfc
Costs went up around 75%
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every person in the country with half a brain could see it was a horrific deal for the UK tax payers. Don’t the Governemt employ anybody capable of negotiating a deal? They had at least 3 clubs interested in the stadium so how did it go so badly?

Heads should roll for robbing the country of so much money to make millionaires even richer. Absolutely no excuse.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â