foreveryoung Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Based on what? Errrrr? Based on he can be no worse than lambert? Experience, proven tactician, good with youth, managed for England, talks a good game, looking for a team to manage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 (edited) Based on what? Errrrr? Based on he can be no worse than lambert? Experience, proven tactician, good with youth, managed for England, talks a good game, looking for a team to manage. He hasnt managed since 2006 and even then he was miserable at Wolves. I also love talks a good game as a criteria Edited February 3, 2015 by Zatman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 (edited) Hoddle would be a disaster . Edited February 3, 2015 by useless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted February 3, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted February 3, 2015 Based on what? Errrrr? Based on he can be no worse than lambert? Experience, proven tactician, good with youth, managed for England, talks a good game, looking for a team to manage. He hasn't managed in 10 years, and wasn't particularly good then. Our next appointment should not be based purely on the candidate being better than Lambert. It should be the best candidate we can get. And if that best candidate is Glen Hoddle then we're in a worse position than any of us could have imagined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomaszk Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 This is how bad Lambert is! He's got options like Hoddle being suggested. Even he would be better for me, he can't be worse. Hate saying that. Please leave Paul. You're out of your depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomaszk Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Based on what? Errrrr? Based on he can be no worse than lambert? Experience, proven tactician, good with youth, managed for England, talks a good game, looking for a team to manage. And if that best candidate is Glen Hoddle then we're in a worse position than any of us could have imagined. Lambert is the one taking us there right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrytini Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I'd rather get relegated.[/quot Careful what you wish for ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrytini Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I know all about redknapps, and Noddle's etc failings. They are poor choices. The trouble is, like many others, I would now rather have absolutely anybody other than Lambert. His record breaking, tactically inept, reign has finally tipped me over the edge, he is an absolute unmitigated disaster. So, unlike one or two who would rather be relegated than employ xyz, I will now tale anybody, anybody at all. I just don't see Lambert coming good and relegation could finish us for good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrytini Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Based on what? Errrrr? Based on he can be no worse than lambert? Experience, proven tactician, good with youth, managed for England, talks a good game, looking for a team to manage. He hasn't managed in 10 years, and wasn't particularly good then. Our next appointment should not be based purely on the candidate being better than Lambert. It should be the best candidate we can get. And if that best candidate is Glen Hoddle then we're in a worse position than any of us could have imagined. Our next candidate has to be no more than someone who keeps us up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Risso Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Our next appointment should not be based purely on the candidate being better than Lambert. To be fair, it would be a start! It also gives us a wide pool of people to pick from. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I think style of football is very important to what Fox is trying to achieve with the 'brand'. So if he's still here when Lambert leaves I think that will play a big factor in who we go for, think we'll cast our net a lot further than we have previously. But that's going to be quite some distance into the future. Because we need to get taken over first and for the new owners to have given Lambert a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbr600rr Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Neil Lennon , worked at a big club in Celtic , yes it's a touch easy but you still have to do it, doing well at Bolton,he will manage in the prem one day, don't think he would stand for the performances from the current players unlike lambert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted February 3, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted February 3, 2015 Our next appointment should not be based purely on the candidate being better than Lambert. To be fair, it would be a start! It also gives us a wide pool of people to pick from. Of course it would be a start. but that doesn't mean we should be entertaining the idea of employing Redknapp or Hoddle because of it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzy Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Our next appointment should not be based purely on the candidate being better than Lambert. To be fair, it would be a start! It also gives us a wide pool of people to pick from. Of course it would be a start. but that doesn't mean we should be entertaining the idea of employing Redknapp or Hoddle because of it! "Anyone is better than this clown!". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dakid007 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Would rather Gary Neville than lambert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted February 3, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted February 3, 2015 Although to clarify, redknapp would not be better than Lambert. And I'm not entirely sure Hoddle would either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Paulo DiCanio. Terrible long term option, brilliant short term option. He'd come in, kick them all in the arse, and win a few games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulC Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Redknapp at least would be more attacking and he certainly couldn't do any worse than Lambert is doing at the moment. Our squad is far superior to QPR's and he did beat MON to 4th spot when manager of Spurs. I'm probably the only one but I would love Harry at Villa. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markavfc40 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 This job is a gift horse for somebody. Fair play to Lambert he has put a decent squad together but is so tactically inept doesn't have a clue to get anything approaching the best out of them. However I am sure any manger worth his salt would fancy their chances. There wouldn't a shortage of applicants and given how poor we have been and the almost never seen before stats Lambert has overseen even Lerner would have to go some to find anyone who could do worse. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papillon Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Paulo DiCanio. Terrible long term option, brilliant short term option. He'd come in, kick them all in the arse, and win a few games. Everything here is true, except for him being a brilliant short term option and that he would win a few games. It is impossible to predict what he would do with our team, but it would be very easy to look at his career and write him off an as absolute tool of the highest order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts