Jump to content

The RJW63 Official Jack Grealish Appreciation Thread


kevangrealish

Recommended Posts

Why would a manager not build the team around his star player. Messi, Ronaldo, Vardy are players in better teams who have a system designed for them in recent times

Edited by Zatman
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Zatman said:

Why would a manager not build the team around his star player. Messi, Ronaldo, Vardy are players in better teams who have a system designed for them in recent times

Why would you build a team around a player who's not likely to be around in 18 months, I do think he will be around next season but after that he'll be coming into his prime and will go to a bigger team most likely playing in the CL (hopefully somewhere in Spain as he'll be appreciated in that league). And the best of luck to him he's given more than enough for the team he supports!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, useless said:

Do people forget that we've only won one game with him playing in central midfield, he might  perform well as an individual in that position but as a team we suffer, we could get away with it in the championship, but in the premier league we need three specialist midfielders, otherwise we'll just get overrun in midfield. Not to mention that he's been much improved himself since moving out wide.

We didn't suffer because Jack was playing in CM we suffered because the forwards we have are not up to standard so he had to get played out of position (in a position he hates), if we get a decent winger in Jan (Benrahma unless Spurs get in there first) it will transform us.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We suffered because we're not good enough to play with a midfield three of Luiz, Grealish and McGinn, that's two attacking midfielders, and a 'DM' in Luiz that isn't an actual DM but rather a deep-lying playmaker, you could also say it's a three man midfield made up of three luxury players, any team in the league would struggle playing with three such midfielders, we need more combative types in there who will hold their position, otherwise teams will just walk through us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we did ok against the scousers in the 1 - 2 defeat without Jack.

Now I might get lynched for saying this but I think all the players look at Jack and expect him to do all the work. I wonder if Jack doesn't play then this means the others have to step up like they did against the scousers?

I am not saying get rid of Jack but we do seem to be a one man team when he plays..... stop Jack, you stop Villa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, useless said:

We suffered because we're not good enough to play with a midfield three of Luiz, Grealish and McGinn, that's two attacking midfielders, and a 'DM' in Luiz that isn't an actual DM but rather a deep-lying playmaker, you could also say it's a three man midfield made up of three luxury players, any team in the league would struggle playing with three such midfielders, we need more combative types in there who will hold their position, otherwise teams will just walk through us.

If you have a manager who insists on playing attacking 4-3-3 football you have to play with two attacking midfielders! It's a game of score more than you concede, but i agree DL is not that DM that should be Nakamba with Jack left and SJM right barring injury of course!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, delboy54 said:

Oh and can someone with more tactical knowledge than me explain why Jack cannot play in the middle why out on the wing, it restricts him to half the pitch! 

Regards

Del

Not trying to argue.

However I think alot are forgetting that we had a run with him in the middle and it wasn't working.

He was stifled, and most were calling for him to go wide of a front 3 etc.

We did that, brought in Connor, and looked lethal for a couple games.

Then as we now know, it's tripe again.

So people "outraged" at him being out there is baffling as this was a popular call.

Although i'll agree since it hasn;t been working it needs to be tweaked again.

However on the overall it suggests the problem is much deeper than simply Jacks position.

The whole team have been shite.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, zab6359 said:

If you have a manager who insists on playing attacking 4-3-3 football you have to play with two attacking midfielders! It's a game of score more than you concede, but i agree DL is not that DM that should be Nakamba with Jack left and SJM right barring injury of course!!

What are you on mate. Why would you need to play 2 attacking midfielders. The idea is you play a DM a box to box midfielder and an attacking midfielder to compensate for all the weaknesses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MotoMkali said:

What are you on mate. Why would you need to play 2 attacking midfielders. The idea is you play a DM a box to box midfielder and an attacking midfielder to compensate for all the weaknesses. 

You don't seem to understand the 4-3-3 system, a box to box player is an attack minded player!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, delboy54 said:

I thought we did ok against the scousers in the 1 - 2 defeat without Jack.

Now I might get lynched for saying this but I think all the players look at Jack and expect him to do all the work. I wonder if Jack doesn't play then this means the others have to step up like they did against the scousers?

I am not saying get rid of Jack but we do seem to be a one man team when he plays..... stop Jack, you stop Villa

We didn't need creativity in that match though.

If we scored first against Southampton I think it would've been a different story. But we were horrible giving them gifts. We can't press we can't do nothing.

Anyway we've seen how it is without Jack last season, even this season at Wolves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Genie said:

If Jack gets injured in the next few games then it’s all over unless several rabbits come out of the hat in January.

That's the worry for me too as in the past couple of seasons he has missed big chunks through injury. We really need this to be a season when he plays in all the remaining (league) games if possible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, JAMAICAN-VILLAN said:

Not trying to argue.

However I think alot are forgetting that we had a run with him in the middle and it wasn't working.

He was stifled, and most were calling for him to go wide of a front 3 etc.

We did that, brought in Connor, and looked lethal for a couple games.

Then as we now know, it's tripe again.

So people "outraged" at him being out there is baffling as this was a popular call.

Although i'll agree since it hasn;t been working it needs to be tweaked again.

However on the overall it suggests the problem is much deeper than simply Jacks position.

The whole team have been shite.

Jack is quality on the left. The problem the way I see it is that he doesn't get space enough cause we got nobody else to rely on. They just triple up on Jack, ignore Wesley and we struggle. 

Funnily enough I just checked the stats from the Southampton game and we had more possession, more attempts on target, more attempts off target, more corners. I would not have guessed that. 

To solve or rectify Grealish being stuck with the sole creative responsibility, we need a winger, striker and CM that just are better than what we currently got. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, KenjiOgiwara said:

Jack is quality on the left. The problem the way I see it is that he doesn't get space enough cause we got nobody else to rely on. They just triple up on Jack, ignore Wesley and we struggle. 

Funnily enough I just checked the stats from the Southampton game and we had more possession, more attempts on target, more attempts off target, more corners. I would not have guessed that. 

To solve or rectify Grealish being stuck with the sole creative responsibility, we need a winger, striker and CM that just are better than what we currently got. 

I genuinely think the board will want to "pull rabbits out a hat" as a poster said above. Otherwise it will be dissappointing and almost like throwing in the towel.

No way will they want us to go straight back down.

Hopefully the extremely poor form and low quality of alot of the play will have been an eye opener for them.

This should have been the thinking even prior to injuries I think.

I agree with you that Jack needs more support around him as well. It's a shame, just as we saw towards the end of the last match he tried to pull something out of nothing on his own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â