maqroll Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 17 hours ago, mjmooney said: Didn't take her long, did it? "Final solution" **** me. That woman is a real horror. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 Imagine if it turned out the guy was just a run-of-the-mill nut case, and only wanted to indiscriminately kill for non-religious reasons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 7 hours ago, av1 said: Its ironic isn't it? They all have their version heaven, they all claim to be a peaceful religion, and its pretty damn clear that life would be more peaceful, dare i say more heavenly without them all. Its the 21st fecking century. Anyone that still thinks our planet, our universe was knocked up by some long haired super being on his day off needs to be put down, as they offer feck all to our lives. So you want to kill them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RimmyJimmer Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 1 hour ago, Villan_of_oz said: Unfortunately these days I see religion doing more harm than good. Just my view but I grew up with religion and I don't like it. I don't believe in god, but I still gibe to charity, help people when I can and live a life where I try to be a good person. I think that religion is a good rule book for many to follow, and for many to turn to in times of need...but I think you can be a genuinely good, rounded person without it, and as a 'story' I just don't believe it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post This Could Be Rotterdam Posted May 24, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted May 24, 2017 I never get involved in discussions on facebook about events like this, i dont find it makes me feel any better and generally think it just creates arguments, but this morning i couldnt help myself. I came across a post saying 'Shut all mosques down. Do it now. And then send all of these brainwashed f***** back to where they came from'. It was soon deleted when i mentioned that the sick ******* who did this was born here and if anyone was brainwashed it was him, and that this wasnt islam, it was a sick individual. I still feel just as sick about this today as i did yesterday. I dont feel anger to anyone other than the ONE individual who did this. If it emerges that this was a result of a wider organisation then my anger will be at them. But no one else, no community, race or religion. It is simply moronic to suggest that we should blame islam for this. Quite frankly, the suggestion offends me. Replying to that comment didnt make me feel any better, but at least its now not on facebook for other like-minded idiots to spread their very own kind of hate. I really hate this world sometimes! 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 1 hour ago, maqroll said: That woman is a real horror. Worse thing about it 1000 morons liked it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted May 24, 2017 Moderator Share Posted May 24, 2017 10 hours ago, snowychap said: Blair sent tanks to Heathrow. Blimey I'd forgotten that, that debate over the extra runway was getting heated though... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Stevo985 Posted May 24, 2017 VT Supporter Popular Post Share Posted May 24, 2017 8 hours ago, av1 said: Its ironic isn't it? They all have their version heaven, they all claim to be a peaceful religion, and its pretty damn clear that life would be more peaceful, dare i say more heavenly without them all. Its the 21st fecking century. Anyone that still thinks our planet, our universe was knocked up by some long haired super being on his day off needs to be put down, as they offer feck all to our lives. It certainly is ironic. Ironic that your response to someone murdering people because of religion is to suggest murdering people because of religion. 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villan_of_oz Posted May 24, 2017 VT Supporter Share Posted May 24, 2017 2 hours ago, maqroll said: So you want to kill them? yes, I think the kettle just called the pot black Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villan_of_oz Posted May 24, 2017 VT Supporter Share Posted May 24, 2017 27 minutes ago, Stevo985 said: It certainly is ironic. Ironic that your response to someone murdering people because of religion is to suggest murdering people because of religion. Thankyou for being so articulate Stevo, in my head was a loop of Wtf! Wtf! Wtf! Wtf! Wtf! etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Risso Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 2 hours ago, maqroll said: Imagine if it turned out the guy was just a run-of-the-mill nut case, and only wanted to indiscriminately kill for non-religious reasons? Well that isn't the case, so not sure what that would achieve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mykeyb Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 Did anyone here the chap on 5live earlier who used to chair the COBRA meetings, very interesting. He suggested that there are far to many to watch so they should start deporting the one that they think they can make a case for and anyone with dual nationality should lose their british passports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 6 minutes ago, mykeyb said: Did anyone here the chap on 5live earlier who used to chair the COBRA meetings, very interesting. He suggested that there are far to many to watch so they should start deporting the one that they think they can make a case for and anyone with dual nationality should lose their british passports. If there is enough evidence then I would support this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post chrisp65 Posted May 24, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted May 24, 2017 If there is actual evidence of anything, why are they on the streets and not in prison? If there isn't evidence, are we just going to accept the state nominating people for removal without any substantive evidence? We don't have the evidence to prosecute but we do have the evidence to deport families into failed state war zones? Quite a knee jerk couple of days. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chindie Posted May 24, 2017 VT Supporter Popular Post Share Posted May 24, 2017 Police 'underfunding' probably hasn't helped make us safer either. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davkaus Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 Quote The Home Secretary has criticised the United States after confidential details about the Manchester Arena attack appeared in the media after having apparently been leaked by American spooks. Amber Rudd said US conduct had been "irritating" and said she had made clear to her American counterparts that such leaks "shouldn't happen again". The episode comes just a week after US president Donald Trump defended his right to leak classified intelligence to other countries' leaders. Mr Trump has also criticised leaking from the US intelligence establishment. Asked on BBC Radio 4's Today programme about the US leaks, Ms Rudd said: "The British police have been very clear that they want to control the flow of information in order to protect operational integrity, the element of surprise. "So it is irritating when it gets released from other sources and I have been very clear with our friends that that should not happen again." Asked whether US conduct had compromised the investigation into the Manchester Arena attack, she said: "I wouldn’t go that far but I can say they are perfectly clear about the situation and that it shouldn’t happen again." A number of details about the Manchester Arena attack appeared in the US media – most notably on networks NBC and CBS – before British police had publicly released them to the UK media. The initial death tolls, the fact the attack appeared to be a suicide bombing, and the name of the attacker, were all released through US outlets, apparently via leaky US intelligence sources. Intelligence is shared between Britain, America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand under the UKUSA agreement, the so called "Five Eyes" programme. The latest leaks come after Theresa May personally expressed confidence in the US-UK intelligence sharing programme. Questioned about Mr Trump's apparent leaking to the Kremlin, Ms May had said: "We continue to work with the United States and we continue to share intelligence with the United States, as we do with others around the world." https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/home-secretary-us-intelligence-leaks-amber-rudd-irritating-donald-trump-russia-security-manchester-a7752511.html Possibly the first thing I've ever agreed with Amber Rudd about. She's a fool if she thinks the same thing won't happen next time though. America can't be trusted with sensitive info. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mykeyb Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 He said that with many there is not enough evidence to go to court with but plenty to suggest they could be a threat, he also said he would be happy to infringe the civil rights of a few to protect those of the many. He has more knowledge than me on the threats involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chindie Posted May 24, 2017 VT Supporter Popular Post Share Posted May 24, 2017 1 minute ago, mykeyb said: He said that with many there is not enough evidence to go to court with but plenty to suggest they could be a threat, he also said he would be happy to infringe the civil rights of a few to protect those of the many. He has more knowledge than me on the threats involved. That should send a chill through your spine. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulC Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 (edited) deleted Edited May 24, 2017 by PaulC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulC Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 50 minutes ago, Risso said: Well that isn't the case, so not sure what that would achieve. Yes uggested he has been to visit Lybia a few mouths before. It was a sophisticated bomb so pretty obvious this has been planned and their are other involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts