Jump to content

January 2017 transfer window


Jareth

Recommended Posts

If Delph was interested in coming here then we should take him. 

Then when we end up back in the Premier League Steve Bruce can tell him the following;

Steve: "Fabian I'm not using Xia's millions to sign better midfielders. You are staying at the football club and I can't wait for the start of the season with you captaining this great football club."
He then signs a new deal on the back of this.

Then we go out, sign a new midfield and let him rot in the reserves. Just for 'lols' we give him a packet of snake sweets every day at Bodymoor along with a Nokia 3310 installed with Snake for him to play on. 

Edited by villanwesty88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Woodytom said:

Not for me. Gash harsh but not great. Especially his second spell. Thought he was awful.

Disagree again. I thought he was excellent in his second spell, especially when Gregory put him in a back 3. He used to pick passes for fun. Bloody good player was Staunton and if I remember rightly was Gregory's choice for Villa player of the season that year. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JAMAICAN-VILLAN said:

Told that, categorically, Villa are not trying to re-sign Fabian Delph from Man City. #avfc #mcfc

 
12:47 PM - 6 Jan 2017
9 replies42 retweets25 likes
Reply
 
9
 
Retweet
 
42
 
 
Like
 
25
 
More

Thought it was too good to be true. 

'He's just about to come on as sub at West Ham anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JAMAICAN-VILLAN said:

Told that, categorically, Villa are not trying to re-sign Fabian Delph from Man City. #avfc #mcfc

 
12:47 PM - 6 Jan 2017
9 replies42 retweets25 likes
Reply
 
9
 
Retweet
 
42
 
 
Like
 
25
 
More

"Name?"

"Nick Mashiter"

"Specialist subject?"

"The f**king obvious."

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, avfc1982 said:

Disagree again. I thought he was excellent in his second spell, especially when Gregory put him in a back 3. He used to pick passes for fun. Bloody good player was Staunton and if I remember rightly was Gregory's choice for Villa player of the season that year. 

Fair enough. Maybe a debate for a different topic. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't want Delph back anyway.  The way he left typifies everything wrong with modern football.  **** him.

 

Edit:  tbh, it makes me quite happy knowing that he's barely playing any football.  The thought of him leaving solely for dolla then coming back and "leading Villa to glory" makes me feel a bit ill.

Edited by bobzy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Snake and Cleverley burnt their bridges when they chose to leave us. They did not want to play for us then and would not want to play for us now. Lets try to bring in players like Lansbury who might want to play for us and who would see a move to us as a step up.   

Edited by John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Delph is a good player, because Villa showed patience and developed him into a good player. I remember when he first started getting games, he was yesterday's Westwood, but he eventually got there. If we signed Delph he would definitely improve our midfield. But, if we do sign Delph, it would say to everyone including Fabian Delph that Fabian Delph is bigger than Aston Villa.  It would cost Villa its pride, and if we only cared about results,then we should all quit supporting Villa and just become glory hunters.

Its never going to happen anyway, but if in some strange world he signed Delph, then I would want Bruce out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bannedfromHandV said:

Even at his peak he was a poor footballer.

Fair play though, his stinking attitude and inept attempt at professionalism developed over time.

I'm with you on this.  He 'd improve our current midfield, but then if I got a game I'd be more mobile than Jedinak, and put more leg work in than Westwood, so it's not saying much.  City only ever bought him as he was relatively cheap and an easy way to get English cover in the squad.  He isn't good enough to compensate for all the trouble it would stir up.  3 league goals in over a 100 appearances is a miserable return for a midfielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, avfc1982 said:

Disagree again. I thought he was excellent in his second spell, especially when Gregory put him in a back 3. He used to pick passes for fun. Bloody good player was Staunton and if I remember rightly was Gregory's choice for Villa player of the season that year. 

Quote

1 hour ago, Woodytom said:

Fair enough. Maybe a debate for a different topic. 

 

Staunton rubbish, really? Wow!

Edited by NASTY_LEE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, AJ said:

Yes, Delph is a good player, because Villa showed patience and developed him into a good player. I remember when he first started getting games, he was yesterday's Westwood, but he eventually got there. If we signed Delph he would definitely improve our midfield. But, if we do sign Delph, it would say to everyone including Fabian Delph that Fabian Delph is bigger than Aston Villa.  It would cost Villa its pride, and if we only cared about results,then we should all quit supporting Villa and just become glory hunters.

Its never going to happen anyway, but if in some strange world he signed Delph, then I would want Bruce out.

What?! Delph was phenomenal when he was playing for Leeds at this level, Westwood has never had one phenomenal performance. Delph was well on his way to being a future England international before we came along. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â