Jump to content

U.S. Politics


maqroll

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Davkaus said:

Yes. Freedom of speech laws are specifically about the government not being able to limit people's freedom of speech.  Individuals are companies are free to limit people's speech as they see fit within services or property in which they set the rules.

It seems that 90% of the time, people who bang on about "freedom of speech" and the first amendment don't really understand where or to whom it applies.

This

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's Kathleen Kennedy dreaming up  her version of an Ahsoko Tano trilogy. 

" Honestly Rian , Guy Pearce will be perfect for the role , they will never expect it"

"Does the costume look like the animation" ?

"Yeah it's flawless"

Image

Edited by Brumerican
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Brumerican said:

DP

 

(May as well condemn the mods for not banning Trump from VT when so much is at stake)

He's welcome here as long as he doesn't want to write about Milot Rashica. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sidcow said:

He's welcome here as long as he doesn't want to write about Milot Rashica. 

I suppose it wouldn't hurt if he was on the league's case begging them to "find" the goals we needed to win after every game.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sidcow said:

He's welcome here as long as he doesn't want to write about Milot Rashica. 

He is fond of right wingers so you never know.

Rashica mainly plays left but would ruin the joke...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DCJonah said:

I don't understand why the Republican party haven't turned on him. 

 

It is, to a degree, at least in Congress. Murkowski calling for him to step down, some of their floor speeches on Wed night denounced him. Romney's in particular. The RNC is firmly in Trump's pocket though. But it won't matter in 11 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DCJonah said:

I don't understand why the Republican party haven't turned on him. 

 

Because they’ve still got to have a party after this. Can you imagine they turn round and say “yes, he’s definitely insane and we knew it all along and decided to stand by him because...reasons”? They’re in pure damage control mode now.

Trying to impeach him a second time will be purely symbolic from the democrats. The republicans won’t back it in the numbers required, unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, desensitized43 said:

Because they’ve still got to have a party after this. Can you imagine they turn round and say “yes, he’s definitely insane and we knew it all along and decided to stand by him because...reasons”? They’re in pure damage control mode now.

Trying to impeach him a second time will be purely symbolic from the democrats. The republicans won’t back it in the numbers required, unfortunately.

Actually it isn’t purely symbolic, it would potentially stop him standing again in 4 years for a start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ml1dch said:

 

They finally tracked down Via Getty.

(see posts passim)

Hard to believe they identified him after he cunningly disguised himself by shaving his beard off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sidcow said:

Hard to believe they identified him after he cunningly disguised himself by shaving his beard off. 

Shockingly it didn't work for this guy either

Man pictured in Pelosi's office turns himself in to authorities in Arkansas  | WGN-TV

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â