Jump to content

High Line ..Pros and Cons


MWARLEY2

Recommended Posts

Best thing is I can play commentator high line bingo when watching our matches on tv.

As soon as the opposition launch a high ball over our defence and get caught offside, the commentators start babbling about the “high line” and never stop. My high line bingo card is soon full!

BTW Dion Dublin doesn't like it so that’s a bit of a con I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, villa4europe said:

And fans... 

Its mad how many replies of "got away with one there" you see for every offside 

"The more you practice the luckier you get"

The only con I can think of is the bloody linesmen don't give the offside when it's totally obvious. The play generally continues with defenders throwing themselves to block crosses, etc... when they shouldn't have to.

Bailey got injured last time out doing just this. 

The other associated issue is the opposition players and fans get an unwarranted psychological boost of a shot on target or a disallowed goal. If the offside is called when it happens (as it should) they wouldn't have this advantage.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jimmygreaves said:

"The more you practice the luckier you get"

The only con I can think of is the bloody linesmen don't give the offside when it's totally obvious. The play generally continues with defenders throwing themselves to block crosses, etc... when they shouldn't have to.

Bailey got injured last time out doing just this. 

The other associated issue is the opposition players and fans get an unwarranted psychological boost of a shot on target or a disallowed goal. If the offside is called when it happens (as it should) they wouldn't have this advantage.

I'm of the opinion that it's because they want the chance or even better the goal, makes it more exciting

Think it was the Chelsea game where Emi made 3 great saves... But they were all from offsides, sky get a great game though

They're doing in to make the game seem more exciting than it actually is 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

pro's:

Watching people creating threads and debating the merits/drawbacks of manager having us play a tactic that has gotten us our best performances and points return in the last 25+ years, and broken or equalled records going back 20 to 90 years.

cons:

Watching people creating threads and debating the merits/drawbacks of manager having us play a tactic that has gotten us our best performances and points return in the last 25+ years, and broken or equalled records going back 20 to 90 years.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, villanmac said:

An unintended benefit of the high line is it keeps the back 4 and midfield switched on and focused it for the full 90. The midfield know they have to press the ball every time or the whole thing goes tits up and the back 4 have to always be perfectly in position.

When you play deeper you have more of a safety net and players can switch off more individually and get away with being a bit more lax at times. That starts individually and can become contagious to the whole side eventually. With the high line if you mess your individual bit up it's glaring obvious and so it keeps u honest.

That’s a really interesting take on it. No room for leniency, keeps everyone on their toes - and the benefit is obvious seeing the amount of goals we produce!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MaVilla said:

pro's:

Watching people creating threads and debating the merits/drawbacks of manager having us play a tactic that has gotten us our best performances and points return in the last 25+ years, and broken or equalled records going back 20 to 90 years.

cons:

Watching people creating threads and debating the merits/drawbacks of manager having us play a tactic that has gotten us our best performances and points return in the last 25+ years, and broken or equalled records going back 20 to 90 years.

Hahaha. You are spot on. I just wanted to see if there was anyone still against it due to causing them heart attacks.  Its brilliant how he has evolved. Remember the back 6 against Brighton away and the lowest of low blocks 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only con is that in the Liverpool and Newcastle games the players of the opposition had time and space to play whichever pass they want and no1 tracked their midfield runners from deep.

Buendia was a catalyst for the pressure on the ball which we have missed this season. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that Arsenal's is so low. They press very aggressively in the opponent third but as soon as the opponent builds out, they drop and are content with blocking/intercepting instead compressing the pitch.

I think as a result, Arteta has sacrificed some of the high turnover possibilities with a more solid defense. The numbers show true as they are the league leaders in xGA while we are 4th in xG but the high line results in some opponents running free.

An interesting contrast in philosophies.

Edit: If you take npXG into account as Arsenal have won 6 penalties, they are 11th in the league. Arteta playing it safe this year.

Edited by DJBOB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MWARLEY2 said:

Thought i would put this up as i just saw some stats.. top 5 current teams in the Premier League this season with offsides won

Arsenal...16

Liverpool...21

Man City ..22

Spurs....38

Villa ..58 !!!!!

They must have our back 4 working on it 24/7. 

I wonder if that includes the number that are offside that seem to get ignored that pundits seem to view as real chances. I’m thinking as an example estupinian vs Brighton at 0-0 and they say it might have been a different game if that had gone in as opposed to the reality that is it would have been ruled out by var because the line was spot on as it usually is  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â