Jump to content

The banker loving, baby-eating Tory party thread (regenerated)


blandy

Recommended Posts

Everyone's calling for Johnson and Patel to be sacked but May's nowhere to be seen. Just hiding away. May is basically squatting in no.10 refusing to come out.

Surely a vote of no confidence isn't too far away.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, bickster said:

Failing to see how it’s pathetic. Just imagine the outcry from the press if people on the dole started investing their money offshore

Anybody CAN invest their money offshore, and if you're in any sort of large-ish workplace pension, chances are you probably have indirectly.  The key to it obviously, is not where it's invested, it's how the returns are taxed.  From what I've read, the Queen has paid the tax on the returns from the investment, so where's the problem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Risso said:

Anybody CAN invest their money offshore, and if you're in any sort of large-ish workplace pension, chances are you probably have indirectly.  The key to it obviously, is not where it's invested, it's how the returns are taxed.  From what I've read, the Queen has paid the tax on the returns from the investment, so where's the problem?

Did you not see Margaret Hodge on the BBC yesterday? Investing overseas is like money laundering and money laundering is what criminals do. Ergo, Her Madge is acting just like a criminal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, choffer said:

Did you not see Margaret Hodge on the BBC yesterday? Investing overseas is like money laundering and money laundering is what criminals do. Ergo, Her Madge is acting just like a criminal!

Quite how Margaret Hodge has the sheer cheek to be interviewed on these sorts of programmes has to be admired in a perverse sort of way.  What with her completely non-tax avoiding family trust, set up for non-tax avoidance purposes, and her family steel company, which absolutely doesn't have a lot of companies in low tax jurisdictions set up for non tax avoidance purposes.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Risso said:

Quite how Margaret Hodge has the sheer cheek to be interviewed on these sorts of programmes has to be admired in a perverse sort of way.  What with her completely non-tax avoiding family trust, set up for non-tax avoidance purposes, and her family steel company, which absolutely doesn't have a lot of companies in low tax jurisdictions set up for non tax avoidance purposes.

Ah now, you're being unfair on the poor woman. When she found out that's what her father had done, she was mortified and immediately took steps to remedy the issue.

 

 

Apparently :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, bickster said:

On the Boris thing, it’s actually worse than that. It’s not just her defence he’s harmed, he’s got her charged with another offence, literally because he opened his mouth and spouted bollocks. She’s looking at another 5 years in Iranian jail.and the only evidence the Iranians have is what Boris said

The Iranians told you this did they :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Risso said:

Anybody CAN invest their money offshore, and if you're in any sort of large-ish workplace pension, chances are you probably have indirectly.  The key to it obviously, is not where it's invested, it's how the returns are taxed.  From what I've read, the Queen has paid the tax on the returns from the investment, so where's the problem?

1) she's rich

2) she didn't chant "oh Jeremy Corbyn " like a moron at her last garden party

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tonyh29 said:

The Iranians told you this did they :)

 

No the poor woman’s husband when he was begging Boris to retract his ill informed crap in a newspapaer article yesterday. That well known bastion of revolutionary fervour The Times I think it was

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NurembergVillan said:

Just gonna pop this here...

morrall.jpg?w=940

An acceptable loss so the rich can pay less tax.

Our society makes me sick at times, this has been particularly true this week. But still, the Queen opts to pay a bit of tax, she doesn’t have too, so doesn’t matter if she dodged a bit or Bono saviour of the sick and needy, doesn’t matter.

Screw the poor, cold and hungry, let them eat cake.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NurembergVillan said:

DWP that gets to decide if she can pay her rent though.

Indeed. I'm taking the whataboutery piss, fortunately.

We don't do much treat the vulnerable in many cases as passively let them coast to their destination, be that more suffering or death.

Because of years of stupid governments and tabloids playing up the people taking the piss. Brilliantly this week has revealed yet again that that will take the piss exist at all levels of society. Some are seemingly more acceptable though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â