BOF Posted February 2, 2015 Moderator Share Posted February 2, 2015 Pete Colley @petecolley 22s23 seconds agoFor Those asking Paul Lambert and Tom Fox both here at BMH and trying to do deals, things could change its a crazy day...Shameless whoring for "please continue to watch deadline day on Sky, pretty please". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3te Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 CAHILL LEAVES NEW YORK Tim Cahill has left MLS side New York Red Bulls after his contract was ended by mutual consent. http://www1.skysports.com/transfer-centre/ Free agent anyone? :-) he can now be signed outside the window as a free agent, too. Definitely heading to england I reckon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packoman Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I think a "The Happening" Gif is more appropriate right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fab Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Pete Colley @petecolley 22s23 seconds ago For Those asking Paul Lambert and Tom Fox both here at BMH and trying to do deals, things could change its a crazy day... That cock teasing bastard. Two hours after he said there would be no business... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunnski Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 made even worse by some silly loan terms that means we have to play him........There's absolutely no chance that's a clause, because it'd never be allowedWell there is obviously some kind of clause that is finance related like us having to pay money everytime he doesn't play. The deal was rushed through after the deadline and I wouldn't put anything past some of the jokers involved with our club making a balls out of the deal. Why obviously? I strongly doubt there is tbh. I think it's more down to the manager not having a clue how to organize a midfield. Think about it, though, how could the FA possibly allow a clause that means a player has to play? He could end up intentionally passing the ball to the other team and still be required by the contract to play every game I agree that's it's unlikely there is a clause that he has to play and I was most likely wrong to say that but it's very possible that there is a clause that means we have to pay money if he doesn't start or if he doesn't reach a certain amount of starts over the course of the season, clauses like that are not uncommon in loan deals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3te Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 They're definitely uncommon, they're just not unheard of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westholmevillan Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 CAHILL LEAVES NEW YORKTim Cahill has left MLS side New York Red Bulls after his contract was ended by mutual consent. http://www1.skysports.com/transfer-centre/ Free agent anyone? :-) he can now be signed outside the window as a free agent, too. Definitely heading to england I reckon Tim Cahill would be a good short term deal IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMightyVillans Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Get cahill! as an aussie he did great for us at the asian cup and would fight more for the team than most of our players currently. Would be perfect to come on off the bench for benteke when he has one of his uninterested games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrackpotForeigner Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 This year's transfer thread is so much better now that we've figured out most Twitter rumours are bollocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Pete Colley @petecolley 22s23 seconds ago For Those asking Paul Lambert and Tom Fox both here at BMH and trying to do deals, things could change its a crazy day... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunnski Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Pete Colley @petecolley 22s23 seconds ago For Those asking Paul Lambert and Tom Fox both here at BMH and trying to do deals, things could change its a crazy day...Shameless whoring for "please continue to watch deadline day on Sky, pretty please". Tbf in one of the recent deadline days Colley was gone home early in the day after stating there would be no business done by us so I'm still clinging on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HanoiVillan Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Cahill has reportedly been offered $3m to play for Shanghai Shenhua for a year, can't see him coming to England myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westholmevillan Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 made even worse by some silly loan terms that means we have to play him........There's absolutely no chance that's a clause, because it'd never be allowedWell there is obviously some kind of clause that is finance related like us having to pay money everytime he doesn't play. The deal was rushed through after the deadline and I wouldn't put anything past some of the jokers involved with our club making a balls out of the deal. Why obviously? I strongly doubt there is tbh. I think it's more down to the manager not having a clue how to organize a midfield. Think about it, though, how could the FA possibly allow a clause that means a player has to play? He could end up intentionally passing the ball to the other team and still be required by the contract to play every game I agree that's it's unlikely there is a clause that he has to play and I was most likely wrong to say that but it's very possible that there is a clause that means we have to pay money if he doesn't start or if he doesn't reach a certain amount of starts over the course of the season, clauses like that are not uncommon in loan deals. Oh, do you mean he hasnt been 'passing the ball to the other team intentionally'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 barcelona insist on that clause when they loan players out, deulofeu had it at everton, it was teh 1st id ever heard of it but it does exist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westholmevillan Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Get cahill! as an aussie he did great for us at the asian cup and would fight more for the team than most of our players currently. Would be perfect to come on off the bench for benteke when he has one of his uninterested games. Every game then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunnski Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 They're definitely uncommon, they're just not unheard of Ok then thanks for clearing that up. [emoji52] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENTLEMAN Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 What has happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AntrimBlack Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 barcelona insist on that clause when they loan players out, deulofeu had it at everton, it was teh 1st id ever heard of it but it does exist in that case, someone needs to have a word with Clark before the next training session. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam3773 Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I should know different. I saw the happening GIF and broke open the Cava. Damn you, VT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marley the Bognor Villan Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Rangers are apparently tying up a deal to loan 4 or 5 players from Newcastle. Bet thats opened a can of worms on their transfer thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts