Jump to content

Chop chop! Lets all gawp at Newcastle (again)


Jimzk5

Recommended Posts

Watford have lost seven of Ranieri's nine games in charge, but five of those games have been Man City, Chelsea Man United, Arenal, Liverpool. They've done well that after those they're still outside the bottom three and have games in hand.

Also Burnley have only lost one of the last six, four of those have been draws, but those draws were against decent sides in Chelsea, Palace, Wolves, and West Ham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, useless said:

Watford have lost seven of Ranieri's nine games in charge, but five of those games have been Man City, Chelsea Man United, Arenal, Liverpool. They've done well that after those they're still outside the bottom three and have games in hand.

Also Burnley have only lost one of the last six, four of those have been draws, but those draws were against decent sides in Chelsea, Palace, Wolves, and West Ham.

Didn't they beat United 4-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Zatman said:

Howe was just a bad appointment, Potter will go the same way being young and English and trying to play "attacking" football 

Potter?! Lol. Potter will be just fine, don’t you worry about that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Zatman said:

Howe was just a bad appointment, Potter will go the same way being young and English and trying to play "attacking" football 

howe is living off the reputation still of promoting little old bournemouth to the PL. they fact that they cheated their way there keeps getting forgotten. both howe and potter are massively overrated.

had they waited a few weeks they'd have been better off with deano

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tommo_b said:

Potter?! Lol. Potter will be just fine, don’t you worry about that. 

He wont if Potter had a name like Marco Silva he would have been hounded out by the media a long time ago. Be shocked if he gets a higher club job

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, useless said:

Watford have lost seven of Ranieri's nine games in charge, but five of those games have been Man City, Chelsea Man United, Arenal, Liverpool. They've done well that after those they're still outside the bottom three and have games in hand.

Also Burnley have only lost one of the last six, four of those have been draws, but those draws were against decent sides in Chelsea, Palace, Wolves, and West Ham.

Burnley-Watford is also one of the postponed games so one team will pull clear of Newcastle if there's a winner and it is played soon.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, imavillan said:

Should have had a penalty ashen it was 1.0.

A blatant foul from the keeper and VAR brush it aside. Another absolute joke of a decision that goes in favour of the Sky 6
 

 

I'll be honest, I don't know the actual wording of the rule book most of the time but I don't think you can give penalties for off the ball incidents.  As Fraser never had the ball and Cancelo was away, that's effectively what it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, troon_villan said:

I'll be honest, I don't know the actual wording of the rule book most of the time but I don't think you can give penalties for off the ball incidents.  As Fraser never had the ball and Cancelo was away, that's effectively what it was.

It really doesn’t matter if you don’t have the ball. A foul is a foul is a foul. 
what about when someone gets pushed in the back as the ball is in mid flight from a corner? 
regardless, it was an awful decision and yet another awful use/mis use of VAR.

It would not have changed the outcome one bit. Sportswash  1 would still have won  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, imavillan said:

It really doesn’t matter if you don’t have the ball. A foul is a foul is a foul. 
what about when someone gets pushed in the back as the ball is in mid flight from a corner? 
regardless, it was an awful decision and yet another awful use/mis use of VAR.

It would not have changed the outcome one bit. Sportswash  1 would still have won  

Ederson has stopped him from making a play on the ball, cancelo had it under control but fraser would have been able to press him or even tackle him 

If that was anywhere else on the pitch and it was Dias who took him out with a slide tackle does anyone seriously believe it wouldn't be a free kick? 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, useless said:

Watford have lost seven of Ranieri's nine games in charge, but five of those games have been Man City, Chelsea Man United, Arenal, Liverpool. They've done well that after those they're still outside the bottom three and have games in hand.

Also Burnley have only lost one of the last six, four of those have been draws, but those draws were against decent sides in Chelsea, Palace, Wolves, and West Ham.

Wow, when did we start allowing Menorcan teams to enter the PL? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â