Jump to content

Cheick Doucouré


Dante_Lockhart

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, KangarooVillan said:

I actually think this venn is lying through its teeth.

Can someone pls explain how Sarr is not in the >75th percentile for progression but Cheick is considering the below?

Venn: https://mobile.twitter.com/GoalAnalysis/status/1424786702045007880/photo/2

E08BC421-1353-4D98-82AF-AA3803F3BF8A.jpeg.e284f9ec7a88d3d12bb3b46ab89c42ab.jpeg

 

BAFDCC6C-B9EF-40E9-9966-716450B32893.jpeg.62cc3560b8c120b248e5e2a10bd1088d.jpeg

I agree with you. In absolute numbers, Sarr has slightly more combined progressive carries and passes. If he's not in there, its likely a mistake. Unless he's for some reason giving more weight to progressive passes over progressive carries.

Furthermore, I'm not sure how he's made the claim that Doucoure is in the >75th percentile for progressive passes + progressive carries per 90 minutes. There is no combined statistic for both that I know of on fbref. The only thing I can think of is that he just took Doucoure's percentile for both categories and averaged them out, but when I did that I still get less than 75. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, KevinRichardsonsMoustache said:

This Titter user must be legitimate: his profile picture shows him using an Apple Watch with a non-Apple phone: witchcraft and clearly a sign that he has connections with the netherworld. 

He’s also drinking a Starbucks in a Costa. The man is an enigma.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Passing progessive distance per attempted pass. Compared to our other central midfield options.

Ramsey-3.26 yards 

Sanson(Ligue 1)-3.39 yards 

Nakamba-3.48 yards

Doucoure-3.71 yards 

Luiz-3.96 yards

Mcginn-5.51 yards

 

Edit: Eh, nevermind. Realized why my attempt at estimating attempted carries didn't work. Removed the second list of stats.

 

 

Edited by Laughable Chimp
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Laughable Chimp said:

 

Progressive carrying distance per touches minus attempted passes.(Trying to approximate progessive carrying distance per attempted carries here) Compared to our other central midfield options.

 

 

 

 

 

math-lady.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Laughable Chimp said:

Passing progessive distance per attempted pass. Compared to our other central midfield options.

Ramsey-3.26 yards 

Sanson(Ligue 1)-3.39 yards 

Nakamba-3.48 yards

Doucoure-3.71 yards 

Luiz-3.96 yards

Mcginn-5.51 yards

 

Progressive carrying distance per touches minus attempted passes.(Trying to approximate progessive carrying distance per attempted carries here) Compared to our other central midfield options.

Nakamba-4.00 yards 

Ramsey-5.74 yards

Sanson(Ligue 1)-7.43 yards

Mcginn-7.72 yards

Doucoure-11.5 yards

Luiz-12.3 yards

 

 

 

 

Makes you realise how good Doug is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KangarooVillan said:

I actually think this venn is lying through its teeth.

Can someone pls explain how Sarr is not in the >75th percentile for progression but Cheick is considering the below?

Venn: https://mobile.twitter.com/GoalAnalysis/status/1424786702045007880/photo/2

E08BC421-1353-4D98-82AF-AA3803F3BF8A.jpeg.e284f9ec7a88d3d12bb3b46ab89c42ab.jpeg

 

BAFDCC6C-B9EF-40E9-9966-716450B32893.jpeg.62cc3560b8c120b248e5e2a10bd1088d.jpeg

All I see are a jumble of numbers.  I don't speak this Vennacular 👀

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Steero113 said:

Clearly you don’t speak English either 

 

 

 

im a dick sry

you missed all of my Venn diagram jokes earlier.  I was being punny.  I thought the 👀 gave it away

Edited by ejs1111
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

another click bait site (the4thofficial) has reported we are after Abdoulaye from Everton, which surely must just be confusion, they need to do a better job of cheicking their sources.

apparently the moon would have to hit our eye like a big pizza pie and then and only then that's Doucoure
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched his YouTube, doesn’t look too bad.  I reckon if you put a YouTube together of Doug’s best bits it would be better - happy for him to come in to provide some competition with him and Nakamaba though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â