Jas10 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, ViewFromT2 said: Ricardo Calder Oscar Borg (when fit) Nathan Baker (as a last resort) Is Calder suited to that position & good enough? Thought he was mainly a MF. Don't know anything on Borg other than we took him from West Ham. Baker should never be considered for LB, let's not mess him about and just continue to develop him as a fine CB, very encouraged by him and has turned out better than Clark ever would've imo. Edited January 27, 2017 by Jas10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney_avfc Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Here we go again 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudevillaisnice Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Dr. Tony Xia @Dr_TonyXia {(75%-(75%+X))+50%+50%)*1/3}+(-95%-50%)+(+50%-50%)+50% #UTV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney_avfc Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 I'm not even gonna try and decode that badboy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynnchin84 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Ooooh stepping it up to GCSE's with the "X" variable. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 15 minutes ago, villaglint said: With regards to him getting kicked it is as far as I can see by far his biggest skill. I'm not sure I've ever seen a player quite so adept at drawing a foul. Should actually be an asset with hourihane and Lansbury in the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delphinho123 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 1 minute ago, Flynnchin84 said: Ooooh stepping it up to GCSE's with the "X" variable. If he throws down a 'Y', that's me done with the Villa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted January 27, 2017 Moderator Share Posted January 27, 2017 4 minutes ago, Barney_avfc said: I'm not even gonna try and decode that badboy! We can't until he tells us what X equals. Damn it Tony. Don't hold out on us! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrenm Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Hi Tony :waves: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam3773 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 The last +50%-50% implies a deal for someone to come in involves someone leaving. Rhodes and Grealish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phumfeinz Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 That x makes the whole thing invalid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 What the... I just... hmm. I thought following football i could leave the fractions behind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddywhack Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 (edited) 13 minutes ago, dudevillaisnice said: Dr. Tony Xia @Dr_TonyXia {(75%-(75%+X))+50%+50%)*1/3}+(-95%-50%)+(+50%-50%)+50% #UTV Walking to school once, a car drove past and the driver threw a wallet at me with £15 in it before speeding off. That wasn't as confusing as this. Edited January 27, 2017 by Paddywhack 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villaglint Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Barney_avfc said: Here we go again I'll have a go. First bit as before is we are looking at three players and will buy one. One of those has moved to 75% the X is whether he is the player we want ie first choice of those three. That is a moving variable hence the X. Second bit is two out goings one now at 95% one at 50%. Then looking at one in one out which could be a swap (maybe Jack, hope not could be Ayew!). Then another in rated at 50% chance. Was enjoying all this but the prospect of losing Jack makes it less fun. Be glad when it's over and we can started watching games again. Edited January 27, 2017 by villaglint 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilS Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Well said ViewFromT2, that pretty much sums up my feelings on Gealish. Just one thing to add to that though, with the addition of set-piece specialists into our squad this window, Grealish's ability to draw fouls around the box will prove to be quite an asset. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRO Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 1 hour ago, mottaloo said: Fck him off. He's a show pony, too flighty and not direct often enough. We need no nonsense battlers in this division, not someone who throws his arms up in a sulk (à la Kevin the teenager) when he gets shoved off the ball. But that's only my opinion of course. Is there any other opinion, we could expect from you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praisedmambo Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 4 minutes ago, villaglint said: Was enjoying all this but the prospect of losing Jack makes it less fun. Be glad when it's over and we can started watching games again. Yeah now I just think he's being a bit of a dick. It's like giving a present and then taking away one of your other favourite things (it is nice having a local player with so much talent who is still only 21 with the chance to really grow with the club). I'm not digging all this anymore tony. In some ways we're going to lose jack to pay for his shit decision in appointing RDM and the related spend. It's bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRO Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Barney_avfc said: Here we go again Come on.....its not rocket science. ......or is it? ps....my brain hurts. pps I am going to use this format in the ticket office, when selecting my seat.......when I buy my next season ticket. Edited January 27, 2017 by TRO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fightoffyour Posted January 27, 2017 VT Supporter Share Posted January 27, 2017 22 minutes ago, Barney_avfc said: Here we go again What an absolute lunatic. He's got one too many right brackets within the curly brackets. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villaglint Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 I'm going to stay sceptical with regards to the Jack thing could be a lot of people drawing assumptions, could be something in it. However it would be a surprising move and Inthink Tony knows how fond the fans are of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts