Popular Post HongKongVillan Posted July 12, 2023 VT Supporter Popular Post Share Posted July 12, 2023 Whoever this person may be throughout this scandal, one thing I have learned though, is that this Jeremy Vine person is a bit of a word removed. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fun Factory Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, HongKongVillan said: Whoever this person may be throughout this scandal, one thing I have learned though, is that this Jeremy Vine person is a bit of a word removed. Exactly. He almost certainly doesn't know the full facts and should shut his cake hole. Edited July 12, 2023 by The Fun Factory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 12, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 12, 2023 7 minutes ago, HongKongVillan said: one thing I have learned though, is that this Jeremy Vine person is a bit of a word removed. Welcome. Yes, that's a lesson many have already learned. An insufferable word removed. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bannedfromHandV Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 2 hours ago, Stevo985 said: Is there any confirmation that it was OnlyFans? 35k would be a huge amount of money for one person to spend on OF. Nah that’s rookie numbers 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 14 minutes ago, bannedfromHandV said: Nah that’s rookie numbers Yup, on podcasts I’ve heard women brag about making £40k in 1 day on onlyfans before. It astounds me that there’s enough men willing to pay to see something that there’s a plethora of online for free. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 12, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, Genie said: 20 minutes ago, bannedfromHandV said: Nah that’s rookie numbers Yup, on podcasts I’ve heard women brag about making £40k in 1 day on onlyfans before. It astounds me that there’s enough men willing to pay to see something that there’s a plethora of online for free. Stevo did clarify "from one person". So £40k in a day is not comparable to £35k from someone. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillaChris Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 12 hours ago, bickster said: Being as everyone knows who it is, don't watch the episode of The Thick of it entitled Spinners and Losers Wonder what was the context behind that, think episode was in 2006 so a long old time for there to be come more rumours behind the scenes at the Beeb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Albrighton Posted July 12, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted July 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, VillaChris said: Wonder what was the context behind that, think episode was in 2006 so a long old time for there to be come more rumours behind the scenes at the Beeb. My guess is that it’s a throwaway gag and could really have been written about anyone. The show would sprinkle the odd jokey reference to a real person, like Nick Robinson or someone. So my gut feeling is it’s a coincidence. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bannedfromHandV Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 30 minutes ago, Genie said: Yup, on podcasts I’ve heard women brag about making £40k in 1 day on onlyfans before. It astounds me that there’s enough men willing to pay to see something that there’s a plethora of online for free. It’s different tho isn’t it, it unlocks the voyeur aspect and because they’re ‘real’ people and not porn stars (per se) it makes people feel like they have a chance…….not that I’ve thought about it much……. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, bannedfromHandV said: It’s different tho isn’t it, it unlocks the voyeur aspect and because they’re ‘real’ people and not porn stars (per se) it makes people feel like they have a chance…….not that I’ve thought about it much……. Yeah, I get all that but still, there’s a lot of desperate men out there with money to burn if they think it’s good value to buy pictures of a randoms woman’s chuff when there’s a million others for free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted July 12, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 12, 2023 36 minutes ago, VillaChris said: Wonder what was the context behind that, think episode was in 2006 so a long old time for there to be come more rumours behind the scenes at the Beeb. 24 minutes ago, Mark Albrighton said: My guess is that it’s a throwaway gag and could really have been written about anyone. The show would sprinkle the odd jokey reference to a real person, like Nick Robinson or someone. So my gut feeling is it’s a coincidence. Yep, just a coincidence IMO but my daughter nearly spat her drink out when she watched it last night 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Albrighton Posted July 12, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted July 12, 2023 21 minutes ago, bannedfromHandV said: It’s different tho isn’t it, it unlocks the voyeur aspect and because they’re ‘real’ people and not porn stars (per se) it makes people feel like they have a chance…….not that I’ve thought about it much……. 16 minutes ago, Genie said: Yeah, I get all that but still, there’s a lot of desperate men out there with money to burn if they think it’s good value to buy pictures of a randoms woman’s chuff when there’s a million others for free. I saw an advert for some show the other day where a presenter was sat next to some woman at a restaurant, the woman gets a ping on her phone and says “Oh dinner’s paid for”. I think she said one of her “subs” had paid for it. It might not be the word she used, but the arrangement was of that nature. The guy’s not there, he hasn’t eaten, he’s just paid for the meal. This isn’t exactly news to me. It just underlines the fact that in a world where people are happily and willingly paying for something they themselves aren’t receiving in any tangible way, then a man paying for an intimate picture of a particular individual isn’t really that ridiculous in comparison. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolta Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 59 minutes ago, bannedfromHandV said: It’s different tho isn’t it, it unlocks the voyeur aspect and because they’re ‘real’ people and not porn stars (per se) it makes people feel like they have a chance…….not that I’ve thought about it much……. I think people talk to them too. They have chats, so for lonely people it has multiple uses. I mean this with no irony...I believe a friend of mine had a secret addiction to it and blew thousands. He had no money and he's getting evicted. He seemed to do it for the messaging as much as anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davkaus Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Rolta said: I think people talk to them too. They have chats, so for lonely people it has multiple uses. I mean this with no irony...I believe a friend of mine had a secret addiction to it and blew thousands. He had no money and he's getting evicted. He seemed to do it for the messaging as much as anything else. Absolute nutter, the Samaritans are free as long as you keep the rocket polishing quiet. Edited July 12, 2023 by Davkaus 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted July 12, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted July 12, 2023 1 hour ago, Genie said: Yup, on podcasts I’ve heard women brag about making £40k in 1 day on onlyfans before. They make 40k because they sell subscriptions for, say, £25 a month and have 2k subscribers or whatever. Then they sell a video on there for £100 and 500 people buy it and they’ve made another 50k. People subscribing to OF don’t pay 35k to the models on there. I mean they might, but it’s an absolutely insane amount of money to spend on there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa89 Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 3 hours ago, HongKongVillan said: Whoever this person may be throughout this scandal, A quick Google seems to reveal exactly who it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post chrisp65 Posted July 12, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted July 12, 2023 1 hour ago, villa89 said: A quick Google seems to reveal exactly who it is. Nobody knows for definite who it is, you don’t, I don’t. It’s pure spechuwlation. 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KentVillan Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 7 hours ago, Stevo985 said: Is there any confirmation that it was OnlyFans? 35k would be a huge amount of money for one person to spend on OF. I have been told by “ITK” that the money was offline payments (possibly blackmail?) but the original contact was via OnlyFans. However later stories have mentioned dating apps, so OF may be a red herring. Point is the money is separate from the original interactions, and the very large amounts suggest hush money / blackmail / or severe levels of delusion on the part of the BBC presenter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano & Dalian's Umbrella Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 Guido Fawkes did an article yesterday where they as good as named them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KentVillan Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 12 minutes ago, Deano & Dalian's Umbrella said: Guido Fawkes did an article yesterday where they as good as named them. Is there anyone at this stage who hasn’t clocked who it is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts