The_Steve Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 (edited) Not saying there wasn't interest, but it's very clear from the reading of Ornstein that there wasn't serious interest, especially with the hip injury. "Premier League rivals Aston Villa considered a move for Harrison but it is Everton who are set to get the transfer over the line." https://theathletic.com/4772495/2023/08/13/jack-harrison-everton-loan-transfer-leeds/ Edited August 13, 2023 by The_Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeroy Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 It's funny how so many like the idea of us signing Harrison but were dead against us signing Barnes who is a far superior player. Weird. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villan95 Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 Can we put Romano on the speculation blacklist? Guy is clearly full of it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 Just now, Leeroy said: It's funny how so many like the idea of us signing Harrison but were dead against us signing Barnes who is a far superior player. Weird. Because Newcastle paid over £30m for him and he's not starting ahead of JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 10 minutes ago, Sulberto21 said: Ornstein doesn't get them wrong. Seems like we were interested but didn't make a move for him then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 Just now, villan95 said: Can we put Romano on the speculation blacklist? Guy is clearly full of it Seeing Romano mess up so badly again is very funny. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomav84 Posted August 13, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted August 13, 2023 Just now, Leeroy said: It's funny how so many like the idea of us signing Harrison but were dead against us signing Barnes who is a far superior player. Weird. probably the amount we'd have to play for barnes. also we had probably forgotten how shit bailey was at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 Meh lame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Made In Aston Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 1 minute ago, Leeroy said: It's funny how so many like the idea of us signing Harrison but were dead against us signing Barnes who is a far superior player. Weird. Probably the difference between 40m and a no obligation loan might have had something to do with it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steero113 Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeroy Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, The_Steve said: Because Newcastle paid over £30m for him and he's not starting ahead of JJ Neither is Harrison and he'd only be moved on after his loan if we have aspirations of top 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 This is what happens when people like Fab try to be first. Impossible he knew what he claimed to have known about Harrison "choosing us" within 25 minutes of the Everton ITK tweeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishVilla10 Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 6 minutes ago, The_Steve said: Shocked that an Everton 'ITK' would hype up a rumour for clout. Ornstein said we considered it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 Just now, IrishVilla10 said: Ornstein said we considered it I don't doubt that we did. This Everton ITK, however, said we had all but agreed and hijacked the deal. Romano saw it and ran with it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeroy Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, Made In Aston said: Probably the difference between 40m and a no obligation loan might have had something to do with it. we probably spent around that on Diaby. and if it were a case of just getting in players on the cheap, we may as well just litter our squad with average players from relegated sides then we'll definitely achieve our ambitions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villan95 Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 8 minutes ago, Aston_Villan4 said: I absolutely refuse to believe the idea that Villa were just made aware of his injured. Fab is a moron to think people will buy that. There's people in the comments that genuinely are. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herman22 Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 BBC reporting he’s going to Villa now! 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBlack Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 Glad I caught this thread after it was already dead in the water. No amount of Bailey's wastefulness would see me longing for Jack bloody Harrison Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mykeyb Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 So @ElBobble…………. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustibrooks Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 Both Ornstein and Fab have had interesting weeks, didn’t Ornstein technically get the Caicedo situation wrong since he’s going to Chelsea now? Anyway on to the next target if he’s joining Everton, I think it’s a good signing for them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts