CVByrne
-
Posts
15,036 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
CVByrne's Achievements
-
This was more a unique one though. I doubt we would have any add ons if there was a mandatory buyback for us in the deal. So I suspect this was a simple they paid us x and we buy back for his remaining book value if they're relegated. So it's basically a kind of Loan which helps us with FFP
-
I think we sold him for £18m so my calculations are based on that, if we resign him on a 4 year deal for £12m then it costs us £3m per year and we banked 18m for the sale in this years accounts. It was a good deal instead of a loan that's for sure.
-
zero % chance of that happening. 3/4m is stupidly cheap for a player as good as Archer. Plus we would just be locking in a loss of up to 10m which we would never be doing to our accounts with PSR to comply with
- 1,971 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- aston villa
- speculation
- (and 1 more)
-
Very unlikely it's that low, it would result in a book loss for Sheffield United. He'll have £13.5m left on his book value so I would imagine our buyback is around that price
-
Yeah he's got 0.39 xG+xAG per 90 in a team who are by far the worst side in the League. He's done well I think for his first season in Prem. He'll learn from it and improve. I wonder what our buy back obligation is, £12m or £14m or something like that possibly. I'm sure there will be PL teams interest in him this summer at those prices. Alternatively we could loan him out
-
The Premier Leage rule changes are irrelevant for the top clubs as the UEFA ones are more stringent and we all have to comply with them already.
-
I don't think anyone does tbh. Heck said it though.
-
He's on record more than once saying the capacity will be increased by 1500 to 2700 additional seats.
-
So improving the overall experience and keeping prices where they are now while adding in 1000 to 1500 additional Premium seating and Premium Spaces. Sounds good
-
I'd go Rogers, Luiz, Tielemans, McGinn, Diaby, Watkins and then Digne and Cash as FBs. Deploy Bailey in second half
-
We have to wait until our new partners were all signed up before we can do any of that. We only announced our short sponsor a few days ago. Adidas need to make all these now. That's the reason for the delay
-
Totally agree. I do prefer the new leaked badge and the old badge to the current round one. I think this is the right unique style and continuity we need
-
To me, off the field is about revenue. Maximise it to close gap on the top clubs as that is the fuel for the investment in the squad. It's about winning football matches
-
Your opinion. Everyone has one. They key part is not being a run of the mill round badge. Also the badge needs to be simple so it can be put on lots of different merchandise.
-
I wonder how much of a draw working under him will be for players. He has improved everyone at the club and surely any prospective signings will be thinking about that. Especially younger players
