Popular Post TrinityRoadSteps Posted May 24, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted May 24, 2014 If they are looking for a number two that will be more use than Culverhouse I have just laid one and it's now on it's way to Minworth 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevangrealish Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Close the door on your way out boys. Tah rah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 (edited) karsa is the brother in law of a guy who owns this snooker club i play for. i am going to try find out his version of events Edited May 24, 2014 by Demitri_C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 How about Gareth Barry as player-coach. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AValon Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Theres a difference between being 'let go' and being sacked. I'd liked to have been a fly on that particular wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSV Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 This could be very telling. If they are not replaced.. then you would think that we are just awaiting a takeover/new manager to step in.If they are replaced then obviously nothing is imminent. Unless the new assistant manager and coach are of the new managers and are just hired early.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 This could be very telling. If they are not replaced.. then you would think that we are just awaiting a takeover/new manager to step in. If they are replaced then obviously nothing is imminent. Unless the new assistant manager and coach are of the new managers and are just hired early.......... Why do people think there will necessarily be a new manager if there is a takeover? It's not exactly unusual for new owners to keep the previous management when they initially take over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
limvillian Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 This could be very telling. If they are not replaced.. then you would think that we are just awaiting a takeover/new manager to step in. If they are replaced then obviously nothing is imminent. Unless the new assistant manager and coach are of the new managers and are just hired early.......... Why do people think there will necessarily be a new manager if there is a takeover? It's not exactly unusual for new owners to keep the previous management when they initially take over. We need to cling to the hope that new owners would be sensible enough not to keep Lambert on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samjp26 Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 karsa is the brother in law of a guy who owns this snooker club i play for. i am going to try find out his version of events Lambert owns Witton Lane snooker club? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 This could be very telling. If they are not replaced.. then you would think that we are just awaiting a takeover/new manager to step in. If they are replaced then obviously nothing is imminent. Unless the new assistant manager and coach are of the new managers and are just hired early.......... Why do people think there will necessarily be a new manager if there is a takeover? It's not exactly unusual for new owners to keep the previous management when they initially take over. Because lamberts shit maybe? Anyway im speculating these 2 knobbers have been sacked due to the passing of information to other clubs, bullying is just smoke and mirrors while the disiplinery was going through. The team will be much better without them. The coaching has been a big issue here at Villa, including the 2 serious injuries to Kozak and Benteke, this shouldn't be happening to the most important players in the team. Glad they are gone, lost my loyalty since the swearing at fans issue, proved there attitudes even then! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrytini Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Unexpected issues that could set the Club back ? Significant enough to be sacked for ? 90% of these cases are in relation to violence or theft.........this appears not to be so,..... the remainder are usually breach of confidentialty. Have we had any issues on the go recently where the Staff knew something and were asked to say nothing ? Which had they done so could have set ther Clubb back, and which would justify sacking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daveburnside Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 I thought the club had video evidence of the bullying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjaacckk91 Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Unexpected issues that could set the Club back ? Significant enough to be sacked for ? 90% of these cases are in relation to violence or theft.........this appears not to be so,..... the remainder are usually breach of confidentialty. Have we had any issues on the go recently where the Staff knew something and were asked to say nothing ? Which had they done so could have set ther Clubb back, and which would justify sacking? Mentioned in the Culverhouse thread, but the leaking of the team line up before the crystal palace game was my guess. Unless it was the 'bullying' related to the youth players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isa Posted May 24, 2014 Author Share Posted May 24, 2014 Still extraordinary that the man who gave these two idiots complete autonomy at Bodymoor Heath and who's watch this all happened under gets away with it scot-free. Only at Villa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post TrentVilla Posted May 24, 2014 Moderator Popular Post Share Posted May 24, 2014 Still extraordinary that people assume to know what happened at BMH and feel like they can assume that these two had 'complete autonomy' without a single thing to base such a conclusion on. Only on the net. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isa Posted May 24, 2014 Author Share Posted May 24, 2014 Except every single media report on the matter and the fact it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theboyangel Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Except every single media report on the matter and the fact it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end. what media reports? I haven't seen much on this from a 'professional' media outlet other than they were both suspended, it was being investigated by the club and would be kept 'in-house'. No details have really emerged, other than the usual twitter allegations and speculation. I'm pleased they've gone, if they caused disruption and issues on and off the pitch - we don't need that at the club. It will be interesting to see who, if anyone is brought in to assist Lambert (assuming he's staying for the forseeable future) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarpie Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Except every single media report on the matter and the fact it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end. You mean media "reports" from such a pinnacles of journalistic integrity like Daily mail? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isa Posted May 24, 2014 Author Share Posted May 24, 2014 Except every single media report on the matter and the fact it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end. You mean media "reports" from such a pinnacles of journalistic integrity like Daily mail? I judge the journalist, not the rag they happen to write for. Though the reports from all the papers on the matter were pretty similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted May 24, 2014 Moderator Share Posted May 24, 2014 Except every single media report on the matter and the fact it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end. Except not one single media report has said the two 'had complete autonomy' that is just something you've invented or someone else did and you've repeated it. It plainly isn't true. And no the reports did not state that it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end, that is just another invention I'm affraid. In peoples rush to be critical of Lambert it seems like people are happy to just invent circumstances to add weight to their argument. The idea the two had a complete autonomy is an utter nonsense. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts