dn1982 Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Except every single media report on the matter and the fact it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end. Except not one single media report has said the two 'had complete autonomy' that is just something you've invented or someone else did and you've repeated it. It plainly isn't true. And no the reports did not state that it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end, that is just another invention I'm affraid. In peoples rush to be critical of Lambert it seems like people are happy to just invent circumstances to add weight to their argument. The idea the two had a complete autonomy is an utter nonsense. I think you're forgetting that anything tweeted is now counted as fact if it gets more than 2 retweets!! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isa Posted May 24, 2014 Author Share Posted May 24, 2014 Except every single media report on the matter and the fact it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end. Except not one single media report has said the two 'had complete autonomy' that is just something you've invented or someone else did and you've repeated it. It plainly isn't true. And no the reports did not state that it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end, that is just another invention I'm affraid. In peoples rush to be critical of Lambert it seems like people are happy to just invent circumstances to add weight to their argument. The idea the two had a complete autonomy is an utter nonsense. Looking back through some of the reports, the Sid/Culverhouse incident is only mentioned as rumour, so I stand corrected on that. Regarding the autonomy thing, they state that Culverhouse took charge of the training sessions and Lambert wasn't "hands-on" in this regard. "Complete autonomy" maybe too strong a term though admittedly. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted May 24, 2014 Moderator Share Posted May 24, 2014 Looking back through some of the reports, the Sid/Culverhouse incident is only mentioned as rumour, so I stand corrected on that. Regarding the autonomy thing, they state that Culverhouse took charge of the training sessions and Lambert wasn't "hands-on" in this regard. "Complete autonomy" maybe too strong a term though admittedly. Fair play to you fella. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delphinho123 Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 All the players hated them both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Get Mulesteen and his crew in. Be an investment for Lerner! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samjp26 Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Get Mulesteen and his crew in. Be an investment for Lerner! Would be fantastic but I can't see it, he's an excellent coach and surely could go elseware with ease. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnbull Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Who? This lot........ http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/FirstTeam 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 karsa is the brother in law of a guy who owns this snooker club i play for. i am going to try find out his version of events Lambert owns Witton Lane snooker club? No it's a snooker club in North London is brother in laws name is mario Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ismail-villa Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 karsa is the brother in law of a guy who owns this snooker club i play for. i am going to try find out his version of events Lambert owns Witton Lane snooker club? It's actually Witton Road Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bannedfromHandV Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Except every single media report on the matter and the fact it took Sid and the players to stand up to Culverhouse in the end. Well if it's in the media it must be true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 (edited) This, maybe more than anything should be a death blow to Lambert's future with Villa. Losing control of or even tacitly supporting out of control coaches is totally unacceptable. Edited May 24, 2014 by maqroll 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted May 24, 2014 Moderator Share Posted May 24, 2014 This, maybe more than anything should be a death blow to Lambert's future with Villa. Losing control of or even tacitly supporting out of control coaches is totally unacceptable. Please read the fifteen or so posts before your own. In fact, that should be a rule on this website. You should have to read the fifteen posts before your own or you can't post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amo69 Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 We will probably never know why they got sacked but as a team we probably looked even worse (if that's possible) after they were suspended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomaszk Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 This, maybe more than anything should be a death blow to Lambert's future with Villa. Losing control of or even tacitly supporting out of control coaches is totally unacceptable. Please read the fifteen or so posts before your own. In fact, that should be a rule on this website. You should have to read the fifteen posts before your own or you can't post. To be fair, is there not just 15 posts of people who also have no idea what has gone on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 This, maybe more than anything should be a death blow to Lambert's future with Villa. Losing control of or even tacitly supporting out of control coaches is totally unacceptable. Please read the fifteen or so posts before your own. In fact, that should be a rule on this website. You should have to read the fifteen posts before your own or you can't post. Take that up with the mods, maybe they can help you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villarocker Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 karsa is the brother in law of a guy who owns this snooker club i play for. i am going to try find out his version of events Lambert owns Witton Lane snooker club? No it's a snooker club in North London is brother in laws name is mario Super! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaw_nuff Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 This, maybe more than anything should be a death blow to Lambert's future with Villa. Losing control of or even tacitly supporting out of control coaches is totally unacceptable. Please read the fifteen or so posts before your own. In fact, that should be a rule on this website. You should have to read the fifteen posts before your own or you can't post. you invent the retina scanning software and I'll market it. this time next year We'll be billionaires and Villa's troubles will be over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillaChris Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 karsa is the brother in law of a guy who owns this snooker club i play for. i am going to try find out his version of events Isn't he Lambert's brother in law? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voinjama Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Good riddance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts