jjaacckk91

I thought he actually had a better game today(last goal aside), and was better than at Middlesbrough where he looked very flappy IMO. I still don't rate him anywhere near good enough though. I'm convinced his issues are mostly mental, i'd like to see him put on two/three stone just to see if it makes him believe he's going to win the ball or at least that he can clear out his man on the way through.

Not sure if this is just trying not to get ahead of ourselves but you talk like we have already lost. And due a loss(I'd disagree because we deserved our results) maybe but that's not how chance works. The chance of a coin flip landing on heads is still 50% even if the last 100 times have been heads.

Excited and nervous about this. I know it's just one game but I can't shake the feeling that a win tonight and we can definitely catch the others, it's tangible. Plus it's the Tesco bags...

No but you can pin save percentage on mostly him. Those stats largely ignore the defence because they focus on shots on target rather than all shots. And focus on percentages of shots on target rather than all shots. Unless we're leaving nyland with a higher percentage of 1 on 1's than every other team. The same way from an attacking perspective they focus on finishing and chance quality rather than total goals scored.

Copied post from my one in the promotion thread http://www.footstats.co.uk/index.cfm?task=league_other (Will need to set filter for championship) Was looking for some basic save percentages to see if an above post claiming just changing the keeper would not change the problem that we concede too many(and to see if I was just biased against Nyland) Couple of interesting points on the stats, we are high up(top5ish) for total shots on target and shots/goals ratio We are low for %shots on target saved(bottom five) There's also a stat there that combines the two. Which basically says if we have 100 shots on target and receive 100 shots on target how do we fare. Over 100% we score more than we concede. Below 100% we concede more than we score. We are at 101% so even with all our attacking talent in the final 3rd Nyland alone almost wipes that out. That is enough proof for me that it's not bias he's just not very good, and we need a change to get promoted come may.

http://www.footstats.co.uk/index.cfm?task=league_other (Will need to set filter for championship) Was looking for some basic save percentages to see if an above post claiming just changing the keeper would not change the problem that we concede too many(and to see if I was just biased against Nyland) Couple of interesting points on the stats, we are high up(top5ish) for total shots on target and shots/goals ratio We are low for %shots on target saved(bottom five) There's also a stat there that combines the two. Which basically says if we have 100 shots on target and receive 100 shots on target how do we fare. Over 100% we score more than we concede. Below 100% we concede more than me score. We are at 101% so even with all our attacking talent in the final 3rd Nyland alone almost wipes that out. That is enough proof for me that it's not bias he's just not very good, and we need a change to get promoted come may.

Could do with some highlights to figure out what actually happened there.

Offside what the actual shit

**** off Nyland near post ffs

Get **** inntherrer

17shots to their 5 8 on target to their 4 4 SHOTS ON TARGET AND 4 GOALS. We are unlucky and Nyland is dreadful

Come on Nyland ffs

Oh my god mcginn