VillaForever1970 Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Saved for a move.... elsewhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dodgyknees Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 More proof this guy is a fraud... How many will call him ITK? lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samjp26 Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 More proof this guy is a fraud... How many will call him ITK? lol. What a clown 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agbonla-score Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 (edited) Confirmed by him not being in the squad or was their a statement made? Oops Sorry, just confirmed not in squad so 2+2=? Son of Wiz, are you: 1) Wiz but under a different name? or 2) actually Wiz's son? By the way, we appreciate you coming on here. Edited January 28, 2014 by Agbonla-score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunnski Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Few people on twitter saying that Houghton said to a reporter before the game that Hoolahan won't be sold to Villa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers13 Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Completely left out tonight. The plot thickens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Lions_Roar Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 I'll put money on hughton saying after the game 'he was left out as he wasn't in the right frame of mind to play'. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AValon Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Funny, but not bothered either way. If we get him, I'm sure he'll do a job without setting the place alight, but if we don't, then hey ho. Getting tiresome now, though. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVTuco Posted January 28, 2014 VT Supporter Share Posted January 28, 2014 Funny, but not bothered either way. If we get him, I'm sure he'll do a job without setting the place alight, but if we don't, then hey ho. Getting tiresome now, though. Yeh, agreed. Who cares. We're ok. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son Of Wiz Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Confirmed by him not being in the squad or was their a statement made? Oops Sorry, just confirmed not in squad so 2+2=? Son of Wiz, are you: 1) Wiz but under a different name? or 2) actually Wiz's son? By the way, we appreciate you coming on here. Neither, just a plain old Norwich City poster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Phumfeinz Posted January 28, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 28, 2014 More proof this guy is a fraud... How many will call him ITK? lol. Stop posting that shit in here, we all know he's a fraud and you're just giving him attention. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhan_Zhuang Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Really petty this from Norwich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted January 28, 2014 Moderator Share Posted January 28, 2014 Confirmed by him not being in the squad or was their a statement made? Oops Sorry, just confirmed not in squad so 2+2=? Google says 4, definitely 4 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villatillidie1980 Posted January 28, 2014 VT Supporter Share Posted January 28, 2014 I hope we get him. Think he can do a decent job for us and 'hopefully' allow us to enjoy the rest of the season rather than fretting about the 'R' word! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhan_Zhuang Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 At home i think he'll be an asset, away from home he might not play every game but you never know. Hoolahan played well under Lambert so I think this is a good acquisition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_John_10 Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 He's better than what we have currently but not as good as the kind of player I thought we'd be signing. I think lamberts interest in other 'number 10' type players means he thinks similar. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir_gary_cahill Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 He's better than what we have currently but not as good as the kind of player I thought we'd be signing. I think lamberts interest in other 'number 10' type players means he thinks similar. What interest in other number 10s? Nothing was ever confirmed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_John_10 Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 He's better than what we have currently but not as good as the kind of player I thought we'd be signing. I think lamberts interest in other 'number 10' type players means he thinks similar. What interest in other number 10s? Nothing was ever confirmed He's said he's looked at other types and sure he confirmed we looked at kiyotake in the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir_gary_cahill Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 He's better than what we have currently but not as good as the kind of player I thought we'd be signing. I think lamberts interest in other 'number 10' type players means he thinks similar.What interest in other number 10s? Nothing was ever confirmed He's said he's looked at other types and sure he confirmed we looked at kiyotake in the summer. Oh yes I remember him saying he looked at other types but no-one was specifically mentioned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pelle Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 He's better than what we have currently but not as good as the kind of player I thought we'd be signing. I think lamberts interest in other 'number 10' type players means he thinks similar. What interest in other number 10s? Nothing was ever confirmed He's said he's looked at other types and sure he confirmed we looked at kiyotake in the summer. Yes, but maybe he himself thought they were too expensive, still not meaning that he didn't have funds to sign them. Not every manager is MON and think they should be allowed to buy whomever they want no matter how much they cost. Have you ever considered that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts