ME Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Not a bad rant, Jaime. Not quite Leemond level yet, but sounds like you're getting there. You're allowed to shoot people who annoy you over there, aren't you? Thaaaaaaaaaaank youuuuuuuuuu Mike. I really aim to get to that level. (not really) Technically I'm allowed to shoot them, but smacking them is less permanent 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shillzz Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 and it'll let the sender know if the sendee does so) Which is probably scant consolation, considering the probable nature and content of photos that you've set up to delete almost as quickly as you've sent them ... Yeah - as you've alluded to here, it's market is basically horny individuals sending revealing photos to each other. It's no consolation to those who have fallen foul of the screen grab, but it is atleast reassurance to those who have not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post chrisp65 Posted October 7, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted October 7, 2013 it's all come a long way since I faxed my penis to the folks in internal audit 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rev Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Why not just send them a picture? Why the time limit? I don't get this. I'm young, this should make sense to me damn it! It's so 19 year old lads can get their 17 year old girlfriends to send them a photo of their snatch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted October 7, 2013 Moderator Share Posted October 7, 2013 As it slowly dawns on CED that he has been missing out on snapchat snatchshots all this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Ahh. I see. Probably should've guessed it was a sex thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meath_Villan Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Brother-in-Law 10 years after meeting the word removed my first impression remains the same ......hes a word removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xela Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Brother-in-Law 10 years after meeting the word removed my first impression remains the same ......hes a word removed Goes to show, you can judge a book by its cover 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) I always judge books by their covers, particularly the ones with the words 'James Patterson', 'Katie Price' or 'Jeffrey Acher' on them. Edited October 7, 2013 by CarewsEyebrowDesigner 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted October 7, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted October 7, 2013 Brother-in-Law 10 years after meeting the word removed my first impression remains the same ......hes a word removed My brother-in-law (one of them, anyway) is a Villa fan, so he gets a free pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyh29 Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 'Jeffrey Acher' on them. Kane and Abel was quite enjoyable Shame he's basically written the same book about 6 times since Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted October 7, 2013 Moderator Share Posted October 7, 2013 'Jeffrey Acher' on them. Kane and Abel was quite enjoyable Shame he's basically written the same book about 6 times since Is that an admission that you've read all his books? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davkaus Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) If I may be forgiven for lowering the tone, toilet paper in work toilets. Why do they do this to me. A few seconds' exposure to the 1 ply sandpaper from hell, nearly 12 hours ago, and my arse is still stinging like I was sodomised with barbed wire. I'd be way more productive at work if I could shit with relative comfort. Edited October 7, 2013 by Davkaus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyh29 Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 'Jeffrey Acher' on them.Kane and Abel was quite enjoyable Shame he's basically written the same book about 6 times since Is that an admission that you've read all his books? I read a lot , maybe not in MJ territory but still a heck of a lot , used to get Readers Digest condensed books sent to me and they were nearly always included in those , so yeah I've read a few of his .. But not all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
limpid Posted October 7, 2013 Administrator Share Posted October 7, 2013 Brother-in-Law 10 years after meeting the word removed my first impression remains the same ......hes a word removed It would be hard to form a new first impression. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted October 7, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted October 7, 2013 I've read two Jeffrey Archer books. The reason for this is that I was so shocked by how bad the first one was, I assumed it had to have been a blip, given that so many of his books were bestsellers. So I read another one. It was just as bad. (Incidentally, they were "Shall We Tell the President?" and "A Quiverful of Arrows"). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyh29 Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 I've read two Jeffrey Archer books. The reason for this is that I was so shocked by how bad the first one was, I assumed it had to have been a blip, given that so many of his books were bestsellers. So I read another one. It was just as bad. (Incidentally, they were "Shall We Tell the President?" and "A Quiverful of Arrows"). Shall we tell the president was in effect the 3rd book .. Kane and Abel then Prodigal daughter being the first 2.... Don't know if that would have made it any better !! Arrows is a collection of short stories isn't it ? Not read that one so can't comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted October 7, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted October 7, 2013 It is. Very much an attempt to ape Roald Dahl's 'Tales of the Unexpected'. Except that Archer should have called his 'Tales of the Utterly Effing Predictable'. It really is awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villaajax Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 It is. Very much an attempt to ape Roald Dahl's 'Tales of the Unexpected'. Except that Archer should have called his 'Tales of the Utterly Effing Predictable'. It really is awful. That's what they should have called the later series of Tales of the Unexpected after they'd run out of Roald Dahl stories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyh29 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Guy I work with is a bit of a coffee connoisseur / snob buys expensive coffee , has all the kit ... and spends about 20 minutes making a cup of bloody coffee , often rejecting it and pouring it away if it doesn't meet his quality control it's just a cup of coffee FFS He will leave some in the pot and email around the office to say to people help yourself ... I wait for it to go cold and then reheat it in the microwave ... just so I can hear him almost sob from his office .. it's the least I can do 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts