KSV Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Liverpool being interested could entice the smaller clubs to think he has a lot to offer still and may offer him a first choice role. so either rway good news. appears Liverpool want him permanently as well a nominal fee. Just tell them we don't want a fee just take him off our wages! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moorski Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 I hope he gets a move suit both parties Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 strange move though am not complaining. whats difference to being on bench here or at Liverpool. THey are hardly paying him more than he got here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villastine Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 strange move though am not complaining. whats difference to being on bench here or at Liverpool. THey are hardly paying him more than he got here He's not even on the bench here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Yeah, Liverpool's bench is better than Aston Villa's 'training on your own'. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fun Factory Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Wednesday showed that given has no future at Villa as Steer was selected ahead of him, and Guzan was on the bench. I hope we can shift him before the end of the month. Nice bloke, but we gave him a too long contract and high wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted August 30, 2013 Moderator Share Posted August 30, 2013 He's a capable number 2 and theirs is a different model to ours. We want him off the wage bill even if this season he's probably a better keeper than Steer. It's a win-win-win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heid3ster Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 strange move though am not complaining. whats difference to being on bench here or at Liverpool. THey are hardly paying him more than he got here The part that confuses me is from Liverpool's perspective, why get rid of Reina only to bring in Given? Not that I would complain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa-revolution Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 strange move though am not complaining. whats difference to being on bench here or at Liverpool. THey are hardly paying him more than he got here The part that confuses me is from Liverpool's perspective, why get rid of Reina only to bring in Given? Not that I would complain. let's hope they sign Given & work out the error of their ways later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyp102 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 strange move though am not complaining. whats difference to being on bench here or at Liverpool. THey are hardly paying him more than he got here The part that confuses me is from Liverpool's perspective, why get rid of Reina only to bring in Given? Not that I would complain. Reina wouldn't have been content as a number 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ciggiesnbeer Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 strange move though am not complaining. whats difference to being on bench here or at Liverpool. THey are hardly paying him more than he got here The part that confuses me is from Liverpool's perspective, why get rid of Reina only to bring in Given? Not that I would complain. Wasnt Reina on some truly absurd wages? I think it was reported as double Givens absurdly high wages? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3te Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 strange move though am not complaining. whats difference to being on bench here or at Liverpool. THey are hardly paying him more than he got here The part that confuses me is from Liverpool's perspective, why get rid of Reina only to bring in Given? Not that I would complain. Reina wouldn't have been content as a number 2 not sure Shay would either tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSV Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 that article that mentioned Shay to liverpool also mentioned 3 other players signing for Liverpool. 3 of them are at the game today in the stands. Guess which of the 4 wasnt there............ Bloody hell! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeyAnty Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 that article that mentioned Shay to liverpool also mentioned 3 other players signing for Liverpool. 3 of them are at the game today in the stands. Guess which of the 4 wasnt there............ Bloody hell! Thought the same myself. Fecking stuck with him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSV Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 (edited) BBC says that it may still be on but may goto the wire. They dont want to pay his full wages. Not surprising. Edited September 1, 2013 by KSV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomaspg Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 hes stuck here. or rather were stuck with him. for good i think, if he doesnt find a new home this summer it will be harder and harder to get rid of him. no one wants an ageging mediocre keeper. How many years are left on his contract? 2-3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abdulaziz1 Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 hes stuck here. or rather were stuck with him. for good i think, if he doesnt find a new home this summer it will be harder and harder to get rid of him. no one wants an ageging mediocre keeper. How many years are left on his contract? 2-3? I think 3 years .. Because he was signed under Eck with a 5 year contract .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Just insane to put him on a 5 year contract. I mean what were they thinking. An his salary, please dont start me off..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomaspg Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 really, we should just have **** sanctioned eck for that level of stupidity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
momo Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Why would he warm the bench at Liverpool? It doesn't make sense. If I were Given, I would stay at Villa for the rest of my career. Never ever is he getting this salary anywhere else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts