Jump to content

Liverpool FC in 2011/12


BOF

Will Liverpool finish in the top 4 this season?  

191 members have voted

  1. 1. Will Liverpool finish in the top 4 this season?

    • No
      155
    • Yes
      36


Recommended Posts

The were hardly an independen panel when 2 of the members have big links to Man U and the person bringing the charges plays for Man U and Liverpool and Man U hate each other.

was it Gary and Phil Neville?

How do you know he admitted using that word or are you just accepting that at face value too?

he has told FA and said in interviews. dont get what liverpool fans dint understand about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adj. 1. racist - based on racial intolerance; "racist remarks"

racial - of or characteristic of race or races or arising from differences among groups; "racial differences"; "racial discrimination"

Ergo Saurez is a RACIST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@toela65: You say Suarez said he never heard it then changed his mind later to say he did? Don't you think that makes his story a little less reliable? Say nothing, then when you realise how much crap you're in, drop someone else in it as well?

I find it amusing that you think it's an anti-Suarez thing. Are you going to ask our opinions on Evra? Or not bother because it will disprove your argument that we are biased in this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically he told Evra he kicked him because he is black, that he doesn't speak to black people and he also used the word negro 7 times.

Nice guy.

So even though he's not been charged with being racist it certainly sounds like he is one.

Inconsistencies in his evidence, admitting to calling him Negro, and then the incident with the Fulham fans. Not covered himself in glory has he?

How embarrassing for LFC...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some key points real quick reading through:

358. Mr Suarez's account of his admitted use of the word "negro" changed several times. He

seemed unsure of when the admitted use took place and what triggered it. His account

seemed to change in an attempt to fit in with the video evidence.

356. Mr Suarez's pinching of Mr Evra's skin was not an attempt to defuse the situation. On the

contrary, it was an attempt to aggravate Mr Evra and to inflame the situation. Mr Suarez's

admitted use of the word "negro" when speaking to Mr Evra was not conciliatory and

friendly. It was unfriendly and was used as part of Mr Suarez's attempt to wind up Mr

Evra. The whole tenor of the exchanges was confrontational and argumentative. Adopting

the words used by the Spanish language experts, Mr Suarez did not use "negro" with any

sense of rapport or in an attempt to create such rapport.

361. Mr Suarez told us that he said "por que, negro?" in response to Mr Evra saying "Don't

touch me, South American". At one point in his interview with the FA, Mr Suarez said that

Mr Evra used the words "Don't touch me, sudamericano". In his evidence to us, he said

that Mr Evra's words were "Don't touch me, South American", all in English.

364. We found that Mr Evra did not use the words "South American" when speaking to Mr

Suarez. The language experts were not familiar with its use as an insult, Mr Evra's denial

of his alleged use of it was plausible, we found Mr Suarez's evidence unreliable in many

respects, and we found Mr Evra generally to be a credible witness.

In total, Mr Suarez used the word "negro" or "negros" seven times in the penalty area. On

each occasion, the words were insulting. On each occasion, Mr Suarez breached Rule

E3(1). Accordingly, the Charge is proved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wont be seeing Toela for a while ;)

nah, wait until he reads the statement and finds out the spanish language experts asked to examine the evidence were from the university of manchester

its a conspiracy against liverpool after all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â