Jump to content

Footnall At The Weekend, August 19-22


rjw63

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mantis said:

Neither were penalties (obviously), but yeah interesting how they spent ages looking at ours and slowing it down etc in order to rig a penalty but this barely got a look.

Looked very much like chest to me

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, penguin said:

Was that not handball? 

Only saw a quick replay but looks like something VAR would look at 50 times in slow motion. Oh wait that’s for United’s opponents.

I don't think it should be allowed to be slowed down. If you can't discern it at normal speed it's not a clear and obvious error. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, VillaJ100 said:

I don't think it should be allowed to be slowed down. If you can't discern it at normal speed it's not a clear and obvious error. 

Yeah, exactly. They just use it to rig whatever decision they want, probably for some shady betting syndicate. Absolutely sick of it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, VillaJ100 said:

I don't think it should be allowed to be slowed down. If you can't discern it at normal speed it's not a clear and obvious error. 

Yeah but the mistake that you're making there is applying logic rational thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mantis said:

Yeah, exactly. They just use it to rig whatever decision they want, probably for some shady betting syndicate. Absolutely sick of it.

But... it didn't hit his arm?

 

Unless I've missed something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once Liverpool realised having gaps between their midfielders and between their defenders you could drive a tank through were a bad idea, i thought they dominated. 

But by then the damage had been done.

Man U bending but not breaking, and Liverpool still looking weak at the back, so sets it up nicely for the 2nd half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bobzy said:

But... it didn't hit his arm?

 

Unless I've missed something.

Re-read my post. I'm not saying the incident from this game was a penalty because it clearly wasn't, I'm talking about how they gave the one in our game.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mantis said:

Re-read my post. I'm not saying the incident from this game was a penalty because it clearly wasn't, I'm talking about how they gave the one in our game.

That's nothing to do with rigging the game.  They looked at this one too, but it didn't hit his arm.

 

The handball rule is just **** ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mantis said:

Re-read my post. I'm not saying the incident from this game was a penalty because it clearly wasn't, I'm talking about how they gave the one in our game.

I think ours was if I understand the rule correctly? The issue is that the rule is kinda insane.

It’s like something Terry Pratchett would write.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â