Jump to content

General officiating/rules


StefanAVFC

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Stevo985 said:

No it's not offside. Obviously.

And in case anyone is wondering why,  the reason is you can't be offside from an opposition pass. Similar to if a defender gets his head to a cross and you are in an offside position at the time (but were not offside for the initial cross) then you can't be offside. This is just that.

Now gamesmanship versus sportsmanship, and more pertinently, leaving the field of play and coming back on without the referee's permission in this particular scenario gives the referee enough wiggle room to disallow it possibly. But I think by the letter of the law, apart from it being sneaky, it's probably legal and the goalkeeper has to take it on the chin and learn to be more aware.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BOF said:

And in case anyone is wondering why,  the reason is you can't be offside from an opposition pass. Similar to if a defender gets his head to a cross and you are in an offside position at the time (but were not offside for the initial cross) then you can't be offside. This is just that.

Now gamesmanship versus sportsmanship, and more pertinently, leaving the field of play and coming back on without the referee's permission in this particular scenario gives the referee enough wiggle room to disallow it possibly. But I think by the letter of the law, apart from it being sneaky, it's probably legal and the goalkeeper has to take it on the chin and learn to be more aware.

So its not that obvious then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Demitri_C said:

So its not that obvious then

No. It is obvious that he's not offside, which was the entirety of your original question.  I said after that that the ref might decide to try and cite gamesmanship in some way if he wanted to be pernickety and call it a foul, but that's completely unrelated to it being offside, which it isn't. Now if you want to shift your own goalposts to save face then fire away :D

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BOF said:

No. It is obvious that he's not offside, which was the entirety of your original question.  I said after that that the ref might decide to try and cite gamesmanship in some way if he wanted to be pernickety and call it a foul, but that's completely unrelated to it being offside, which it isn't. Now if you want to shift your own goalposts to save face then fire away :D

Yeah but if it was obvious it wouldn't need explaining to that extent 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the FIFA TSG has called Ronaldo a "total genius" for his dive to win a penalty.

The game is beyond saving when people at the top think that manufacturing contact and throwing yourself to the floor is something to applaud rather than condemn.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Davkaus said:

One of the FIFA TSG has called Ronaldo a "total genius" for his dive to win a penalty.

The game is beyond saving when people at the top think that manufacturing contact and throwing yourself to the floor is something to applaud rather than condemn.

The contact wasn't enough to cause that fall and the defender got a good foot on the ball

They've made a good tackle a foul because they would rather have the outcome of a star player scoring a goal

It was a terrible decision

Edit -  FWIW I don't think he even manufactured the contact, I think that's a completely natural comi g together that occurs hundreds of times per match, it's still a contact sport

Edited by villa4europe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was an interesting situation before the Australia goal that they talked about in the studio after the game with retired ref Jonas Karlsson. They showed a replay of the ref tripping a Tunisian player who was tracking the Aussie player in possession. By mistake of course. The ref let them play on and Australia scored a few seconds later.

Apparently there is nothing specific in the rules about refs tripping or obstructing a player so it's a situation to situation thing if the ref feels like stopping play or not. Does say you should stop play if you are interfering. Seems kinda odd since they are told to stop play if the ball hits them.

The Tunisian player was really upset about it but non of his teammates seemed to have noticed the situation. Didn't watch the game so no idea if the commentators picked up on it as it happened.

Edit: The ref in the Swedish studio thinks it should have been ruled out.

Edited by sne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sne said:

Was an interesting situation before the Australia goal that they talked about in the studio after the game with retired ref Jonas Karlsson. They showed a replay of the ref tripping a Tunisian player who was tracking the Aussie player in possession. By mistake of course. The ref let them play on and Australia scored a few seconds later.

Apparently there is nothing specific in the rules about refs tripping or obstructing a player so it's a situation to situation thing if the ref feels like stopping play or not. Does say you should stop play if you are interfering. Seems kinda odd since they are told to stop play if the ball hits them.

The Tunisian player was really upset about it but non of his teammates seemed to have noticed the situation. Didn't watch the game so no idea if the commentators picked up on it as it happened.

Edit: The ref in the Swedish studio thinks it should have been ruled out.

The Diego Carlos rule is to send off the Tunisian player

 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not sure why it never occurred to me before @a-k mentioned it in the world cup match thread and it makes perfect sense. Why don’t they scrap penalties for fouls/handballs in the penalty area?

It would stop the diving and cheating immediately. Issue an indirect free kick instead. Job done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Genie said:

I’m not sure why it never occurred to me before @a-k mentioned it in the world cup match thread and it makes perfect sense. Why don’t they scrap penalties for fouls/handballs in the penalty area?

It would stop the diving and cheating immediately. Issue an indirect free kick instead. Job done.

I don't think all should be indirect FKs, but for example in the POR - URU match, did that accidental handball affect play? Yes (well, maybe not if the rat didn't stop playing to complain to the ref). Did it prevent POR from scoring? Hard to say, at least not obviously or intentionally. So, why reward that with a pen? I can understand cases like the Suarez handball in 2010 or if a player is about to shoot and is taken out, but to give any "foul" in the box as a penalty, such as Kane running towards the touchline vs Cash? Nah. Of course, then we have to use the referee's judgement on what may constitute a pen vs an indirect FK...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Genie said:

I’m not sure why it never occurred to me before @a-k mentioned it in the world cup match thread and it makes perfect sense. Why don’t they scrap penalties for fouls/handballs in the penalty area?

It would stop the diving and cheating immediately. Issue an indirect free kick instead. Job done.

Not the worst idea but think only some issues should not be a penalty. The penalty Digne conceded I think when it was a handball from a header about a yard away this should be an indirect free kick for examplet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, a-k said:

I don't think all should be indirect FKs, but for example in the POR - URU match, did that accidental handball affect play? Yes (well, maybe not if the rat didn't stop playing to complain to the ref). Did it prevent POR from scoring? Hard to say, at least not obviously or intentionally. So, why reward that with a pen? I can understand cases like the Suarez handball in 2010 or if a player is about to shoot and is taken out, but to give any "foul" in the box as a penalty, such as Kane running towards the touchline vs Cash? Nah. Of course, then we have to use the referee's judgement on what may constitute a pen vs an indirect FK...

Yeah, I’ve just taken the handball thing a step further. Diving in the box is a huge problem for the game, so why not take away the incentive? I’d be all for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 minutes ago, Genie said:

Yeah, I’ve just taken the handball thing a step further. Diving in the box is a huge problem for the game, so why not take away the incentive? I’d be all for it. 

Doesn't this just incentivise bringing people down in the box?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Zatman said:

Not the worst idea but think only some issues should not be a penalty. The penalty Digne conceded I think when it was a handball from a header about a yard away this should be an indirect free kick for examplet

Does the Digne one even need to be an offence?

We've got all these **** rules about silhouettes but I can't say it's helping actually clamp down on ones which are deliberate, which is what the offence is supposed to be. You could just call all accidental handball an IFK, but I don't see what's gained from it

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â