Jump to content

Please tell me when to stop laughing at SHA


rjw63

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, One For The Road said:

The ones rampaging yesterday wouldn't have given a toss about football bans or anything like that as they only seemed interested in picking people off and attacking them. They didn't seem like football fans to me.

Lets hope they catch AIDS

Fans like that ruin it for the genuine supporters. 

Edited by Xela
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They wont go down but jota wont be the difference for promotion. They look pretty shit to me. We didnt play particularly well yet almost won the game. That was probably the best they could play. 

I dont thibk jota will be there long when he realises how shit they are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Demitri_C said:

They wont go down but jota wont be the difference for promotion. They look pretty shit to me. We didnt play particularly well yet almost won the game. That was probably the best they could play. 

I dont thibk jota will be there long when he realises how shit they are

Not one iota?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, TrentVilla said:

 

I think a lot of people seem to rate Jota a lot more than I do, not sure what I’m missing. 

He's definitely a highlights player. Flatters to deceive more than often. I fell for it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TrentVilla said:

 

I think a lot of people seem to rate Jota a lot more than I do, not sure what I’m missing. 

I thought he was a one trick pony all he seemed to do was try cut inside every time.  It was very predictable and easy to defend against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Demitri_C said:

I thought he was a one trick pony all he seemed to do was try cut inside every time.  It was very predictable and easy to defend against.

I agree although it actually helped us having a right footed LB for that reason. I just didn’t think he was anything special at all though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

Questions for Birmingham City over links to controversial political party

Date published: Wednesday 1st November 2017 9:34

Birmingham City FC risk upsetting supporters and the local community after it emerged that the club will play host to the annual conference of a highly controversial political party.

‘Justice for men and boys (and the women who love them)’ was founded by Mike Buchanan, who is still the party’s leader. Buchanan had previously formed ‘The Anti-Feminism League’ and the ‘Campaign for Merit in Business’. The party’s principal aim is to alter what it perceives to be the exploitation of the human rights of men and boys by a state that privileges women and girls.

To say there is a sinister undertone to the party is an understatement. Links from the ‘j4mb’ website include pieces titled ’13 reasons women lie about being raped’ and ’10 reasons false rape allegations are common’, with the underlying claim that sexism causes far more harm to men and boys than to women and girls.

Buchanan and members of his party handed out leaflets before Birmingham City’s home game against Aston Villa on Sunday, and a news item on his website announces that the party conference in 2018 will be held at St Andrew’s Stadium. Buchanan is a known Birmingham City fan, and is seen in the video wearing a club shirt with his name on the back and carrying a club football.

In a YouTube video Buchanan is shown around St Andrew’s ahead of the conference. He explains that he will be able to post whatever messages he sees fit on the club’s LED screen looking out onto the pitch as part of the conference arrangement, reiterating that later in the video.

“Here we are at the home of the Blues,” Buchanan says. “That fits for a men’s conference. Blues for boys and pink for girls, just as nature intended.”

Amongst the points in Buchanan’s detailed manifesto is criticism for the public funding of women’s domestic abuse organisations such as Women’s Aid and the claim that the state is disadvantaging males in 20 areas including abortion, education, sexual abuse, domestic violence and divorce.

On Tuesday, Buchanan spoke on BBC Radio Nottingham on the subject of allegations of sexual harassment of women in the workplace, and his views were emphatic:

“I spent 30 years in the business world and never once came across an example of women claiming to be sexually harassed. This is women claiming to be sexually harassed, not who have been harassed. If we believe them we are basically saying that men are guilty.

“There are some very unattractive women, including some politicians, who claim sexual harassment. Their claims are not credible. Perhaps they are fantasising.

“It’s usually unattractive women who claim to have been sexually harassed and it is simply not right. If she’s more attractive she’ll get more attention from men so she won’t need to claim things It’s simple.”

The news may come as a shock to supporters given Birmingham City’s excellent record in campaigning for equality. They are the only English Football League club working towards the Premier League Equality Standard Advanced Award for commitment to equality, but there are valid questions to answer as to how playing host to a political organisation with such controversial views on women’s rights fits in with that aim.

The club stresses on its website that it has a ‘shared duty to safeguard the longevity of the business, provide a high standard of service to our existing fans whilst nurturing the next generation of supporters’. The hope is that they are not fully aware of the views of the organisation that is intending to use its facilities for is annual conference.

‘Birmingham City Football Club’s aim is to confront and eliminate discrimination, whether by reason of race, colour, nationality, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, age, ethnic and national origin, disability or gender reassignment,’ a statement on their website reads. This is a sad step backwards.

 

A circus in town!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, omariqy said:

He's definitely a highlights player. Flatters to deceive more than often. I fell for it too.

I agree, I think he's a bit showy wand little substance but that will be enough against some of the shitter defences in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

A run of five goals in five games in February, which included his first hat-trick for the club, won Jota a nomination for the Championship Player of the Month award.[34] He finished the season as Brentford's third-leading scorer behind Lasse Vibe and the departed Scott Hogan,[35] with 12 goals from 23 appearances, and the club triggered the one-year option on his contract

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jota_(footballer)

Brenford recalled him in January and he scored basically 1 in 2 and set up a decent amount.

I'd say it's a combination of him struggling a bit more in a far more defensive team and actually being injured and still trying to get up to the pace.

He's a very good player at this level though and as the season progresses I'd imagine he'll get more influential for them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah he will be decent, but again his style of play doesnt suit a team playing for a boring 1-0 like blose do 

I cant seem him sticking around there for longer than a few years. he clearly went for the money as blose are as big as brentford 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't we got any more phunnay inbred pics to laugh at? All this stuff about the merits of their shitty players is bringing the thread down ;)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â