Jump to content

Israel, Palestine and Iran


Swerbs

Recommended Posts

IDF put out a statement early hours of this morning that the ground operation into Gaza will be aborted, if Hamas releases all hostages and surrenders to the Israeli authorities. 

It is acknowledged on here that Hamas is a terrorist group, and that the best outcome would see all Palestinian civilians in Gaza spared and protected from the inevitable harm of a war on the ground. That outcome is in Hamas’ power to deliver.

If Hamas refuses to release its hostages and refuses to surrender to Israel, then it is inviting the IDF to attack - as Hamas continues to hide behind and amongst the civilian population. 

The Israelis are offering Hamas (and by extension the Palestinian people they control) a way out of this war before it properly begins. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Awol said:

IDF put out a statement early hours of this morning that the ground operation into Gaza will be aborted, if Hamas releases all hostages and surrenders to the Israeli authorities. 

It is acknowledged on here that Hamas is a terrorist group, and that the best outcome would see all Palestinian civilians in Gaza spared and protected from the inevitable harm of a war on the ground. That outcome is in Hamas’ power to deliver.

If Hamas refuses to release its hostages and refuses to surrender to Israel, then it is inviting the IDF to attack - as Hamas continues to hide behind and amongst the civilian population. 

The Israelis are offering Hamas (and by extension the Palestinian people they control) a way out of this war before it properly begins. 
 

 

Sounds fair enough, be interesting to see if Hamas accepts this deal! 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, villaglint said:

Sounds fair enough, be interesting to see if Hamas accepts this deal! 

Right. But if expecting Hamas to surrender is deemed unrealistic, then expecting Israel not to pursue them into Gaza is equally (if not more) so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't understand this hospital bomb discussion. It is absolutely certain US and Israeli intelligence have exact locations of each missile fired. They have satellites all over it.

If it was indeed a Hamas rocket, why can't they show pictures of where it's come from, it's trajectory, not even mentioning they could show the videos of launch and flight path? 

I know it's intelligence, but surely this argument which questions Israeli morality could be very easily resolved? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr_Dogg said:

They want Hamas to surrender what? Everything? Give up their cause and hand themselves over? 

Well, they are about to lose everything anyway when Israel start the full scale war. 

Sometimes the smart thing in the long run to concede somewhat and rebuilt. Not that i expect that to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to appreciate the brass neck required to say 'can the bad guys just hand themselves over, and if they don't, we're completely justified in whatever we do to the 'innocents' *winkwink* in the crossfire'.

Especially when those bad guys position is slightly more complicated than just being criminals.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, magnkarl said:

I think what the others are trying to say is that Hamas is willfully building bunkers/tunnels/ammo storage below universities, hospitals and high rise buildings as they know that the Western community will caution Israel from striking these.

Just on this, yes Hamas is doing and has done that over years. So faced with a terrorist opponent "protecting" itself by hiding and sheltering under civilians, Israel has an obligation not to bomb those places. A strategy of flattening Gaza, which is what they're doing is wrong, both in International Humanitarian law, and in practicality - it doesn't work, and hasn't worked.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Awol said:

IDF put out a statement early hours of this morning that the ground operation into Gaza will be aborted, if Hamas releases all hostages and surrenders to the Israeli authorities. 

It is acknowledged on here that Hamas is a terrorist group, and that the best outcome would see all Palestinian civilians in Gaza spared and protected from the inevitable harm of a war on the ground. That outcome is in Hamas’ power to deliver.

If Hamas refuses to release its hostages and refuses to surrender to Israel, then it is inviting the IDF to attack - as Hamas continues to hide behind and amongst the civilian population. 

The Israelis are offering Hamas (and by extension the Palestinian people they control) a way out of this war before it properly begins. 
 

 

I'm not sure anyone has ever said Israel shouldn't "attack" at all.

They have every right to retaliate.

The issue is the scale and method of the retaliation.

 

Having a right to retaliate or attack doesn't mean you have a right to commit war crimes, for example

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Mr_Dogg said:

They want Hamas to surrender what? Everything? Give up their cause and hand themselves over? Do you think the people of Palestine want that? 

Surrender themselves into custody for prosecution, following the massacre on the 7th of October.

Their ‘cause’, according to the Hamas Charter, is the destruction of the state of Israel. Not securing rights for Palestinian civilians or anything actually achievable, but the eradication of Israel as a state. Hamas has also now demonstrated what their plans would be for any Israeli civilians that fall under their control - i.e. demonic levels of butchery.

Some might argue that’s a little uncompromising and maximalist as an objective, and it might also be argued (following events on the 7th) that gives Israel the right to go after Hamas and destroy them physically in Gaza. The legality of hunting down the leadership in other sovereign states and assassinating them is definitely questionable, but they will do it anyway - as they did after Munich, and to the Nazis before them.

It’s quite hard to argue on one hand that Hamas can’t be expected to surrender, and on the other that Israel has no right to go after them. If Hamas’ was at all interested in the welfare of Palestinians then it has the opportunity to ensure their welfare.

If, as you suggest, Palestinian civilians support Hamas and what they did in Israel (and civilian participation in kidnappings, looting of settlements, mistreating hostages, and spitting on the body of a murdered German Jewish woman, suggests that some might), then Hamas as the governing authority still has ultimate responsibility for their welfare.

Instead, Hamas really only cares about killing Israelis, as if doing so will magic away an internationally recognised UN member state. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Stevo985 said:

I'm not sure anyone has ever said Israel shouldn't "attack" at all.

They have every right to retaliate.

The issue is the scale and method of the retaliation.

 

Having a right to retaliate or attack doesn't mean you have a right to commit war crimes, for example

Of course, by definition no state has a right to commit war crimes. BTW, an armed force hiding behind civilians is committing a war crime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw Israel still has capitol punishment for "crimes against the Jewish people during wartime" and they've not been shy at torturing prisoners according reports. So it's likely torture and death the Hamas terrorists would be surrendering to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stevo985 said:

I was just saying it doesn’t give Israel the right to do whatever they want

Absolutely, no argument here. I was only making the point that Hamas could avoid any further civilian deaths by accepting the invitation to surrender. However, it is impossible to fight in an urban area (in which civilians have either ignored instructions to leave or been coerced to remain by Hamas) and still avoid all civilian casualties.

Even if Hamas wants to fight the IDF to the finish, they could as the authority on the ground insist that Palestinian civilians evacuate south of Wadi Gaza in order to protect them. Hamas is doing the opposite, and deliberately keeping civilians in the environment where fighting will take place.    

Therefore, civilian deaths that do occur are ultimately the responsibility of Hamas, because it is Hamas who kept them there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Awol said:

Even if Hamas wants to fight the IDF to the finish, they could as the authority on the ground insist that Palestinian civilians evacuate south of Wadi Gaza in order to protect them. 

Israel has been bombing south of Wadi Gaza - there are reports that Palestinians have been heading back North because they don't feel any safer in the South than they do there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Awol said:

IDF put out a statement early hours of this morning that the ground operation into Gaza will be aborted,

Im not sure why I originally read this as BOF putting out a statement cancelling the ground operation.

It seemed a little beyond his usual remit.

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Awol said:

Absolutely, no argument here. I was only making the point that Hamas could avoid any further civilian deaths by accepting the invitation to surrender. However, it is impossible to fight in an urban area (in which civilians have either ignored instructions to leave or been coerced to remain by Hamas) and still avoid all civilian casualties.

Even if Hamas wants to fight the IDF to the finish, they could as the authority on the ground insist that Palestinian civilians evacuate south of Wadi Gaza in order to protect them. Hamas is doing the opposite, and deliberately keeping civilians in the environment where fighting will take place.    

Therefore, civilian deaths that do occur are ultimately the responsibility of Hamas, because it is Hamas who kept them there.

No, the ultimate responsibility will always be with the ones doing the killing. Hamas would take their fair share of the blame though in that case.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â