Jump to content

The banker loving, baby-eating Tory party thread (regenerated)


blandy

Recommended Posts

Who could have forseen that choosing to spend loads of time talking about an issue that (a) most people didn't really have an opinion on and (b) you're catastrophically failing at would make more people aware that you're shit?

Genius.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ml1dch said:

Who could have forseen that choosing to spend loads of time talking about an issue that (a) most people didn't really have an opinion on and (b) you're catastrophically failing at would make more people aware that you're shit?

Genius.

'Build that Wall! Build that Wall! Build that.....I mean....Stop the Boats! Stop the Boats! Stop the Boats!'

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, bickster said:

So the new line appears to be that Wokeism is responsible for child sex abuse

They really need to find a subject that they are not directly responsible for making worse themselves. You don't need much of a memory to remember that they had 136 children go missing from a hotel run by the home office. 66 of them are still missing and the government have done the square route of FA to try and find them.

They are currently passing a bill though that will allow them to hold children in detention until they turn 18 and then deport them. It's a policy designed to send children into the arms of abusers. 

I know it is tough to find a subject where they have the high ground (Ukraine is the only one I can think of), but they really need to do better than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Straggler said:

They are currently passing a bill though that will allow them to hold children in detention until they turn 18 and then deport them. It's a policy designed to send children into the arms of abusers. 

Daily Mail reader: "But they won't be white British children, so that doesn't matter". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mjmooney said:

Daily Mail reader: "But they won't be white British children, so that doesn't matter". 

They would have grown up to be murderers and rapists anyway so it’s best they are shipped out. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jareth said:

It's reassuring to see the 'huge disasters that'll put your core voters off ever voting for you' - are still happening, regularly.  

 

The only slim hope Sunak had of being in with a shout at the next GE was to address the elephant in the room and admit Brexit failed.

He didn’t want to have that fight so will pay the price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NurembergVillan said:

Q - When is a Tory not a Tory?

A - When it's leaflet season in their constituency and they don't want you to know they're a Tory 😬

image.png

Gotta laugh at Jeremy Hunt, pledging to remove sewerage from the river put in as a result of Brexit :lol: I’m hope lots of his constituents are reminding him of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Exclusive: Government Rejected Dover Port Funding Bid For Extra Passport Booths
The cash would have paid for additional checks needed because of Brexit.

Ministers turned down a bid by the Port of Dover for funding to build more passport booths, HuffPost UK can reveal.

Officials at the port applied to the Cabinet Office for £33 million from a special infrastructure fund in 2020.

The cash would have paid for “additional French passport control booths to compensate for slower transaction times and a reordering of controls within the port” following Brexit.

But a press release issued by the port in December 2020 says that “at the eleventh hour the port [was] offered just one tenth of one per cent of what was needed”.

The press release added: “Dover will still provide the highest frequency, highest capacity and therefore ultimately the best supply chain resilience as the closest point to Britain’s largest trading partner, but the lack of financial support will make a smoother transition more difficult. [...]

Huff Post

You'd be forgiven for thinking that they don't want you spending your money in that abroadia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bickster said:

Huff Post

You'd be forgiven for thinking that they don't want you spending your money in that abroadia

Hardly an exclusive - it was reported the last time there were all those queues last summer, too. It's more just sheer incompetence and lack of any kind of forward thinking that;s the reason, though IMO, rather than a plan to get people to go on holiday in the UK.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, blandy said:

Hardly an exclusive - it was reported the last time there were all those queues last summer, too. It's more just sheer incompetence and lack of any kind of forward thinking that;s the reason, though IMO, rather than a plan to get people to go on holiday in the UK.

It’s proper head in the sand stuff from our government. They don’t want to be seen to be doing a U turn on the expenditure or letting the remoaners be proved right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StefanAVFC said:

GBNews quietly getting more and more Tory MPs as presenters. How is this legal? Or if not illegal, in line with ofcom guidelines?

I don't know the law on this? Does it have to provide balanced news and views? It's a right wing echo chamber and they only people who watch it are already that way inclined so can't imagine it has much influence over normal people 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, picicata said:
1 hour ago, StefanAVFC said:

 

I don't know the law on this? Does it have to provide balanced news and views?

Basically yes - Have at it in detail if you like (pdf on link). All channels have to adhere to the code.

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0033/99177/broadcast-code-guidance-section-5-march-2017.pdf

They may be sailing close to the wind

Quote

Rule 5.3
No politician may be used as a newsreader, interviewer or reporter in any news
programmes unless, exceptionally, it is editorially justified. In that case, the political
allegiance of that person must be made clear to the audience.

Guidance
1.20 The use of politicians as reporters or presenters in news programmes could be
problematic in the context of the requirement for due impartiality. A politician is likely
to include an elected representative e.g. an MP or councillor, a candidate, an
applicant to be a candidate or a prospective candidate (that is a candidate for
election who knows they have been chosen to represent a party at an election), an
employee of a political party or an activist.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â