jim Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 Would be hilarious if the lose again and Brian gets the tin tack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 Mudryk (who I’ve never heard of) signs for £89m on an 8.5 year contract. Proper heads gone. Chelsea to implode. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 I dont really understand what Potter is trying to do at Chelsea, possession for possession sake. Its not exciting and probably does need a pre season to get his ideas across but it looks like a poor match He isnt helped by his owner buying any player he can find Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommo_b Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 6 minutes ago, maqroll said: Absolutely swindled. Good for Brighton. It’s telling that Man City were willing to offer 40 million max and then Chelsea come in swinging their dick with a 60 million offer, ridiculous transfer business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 That’s the weakest Chelsea side I’ve seen in a long time 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sne Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 I was so certain Sterling would end up at Newcastle when he left City, obviously I was wrong there. Maybe this time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 Just now, Genie said: Mudryk (who I’ve never heard of) signs for £89m on an 8.5 year contract. Proper heads gone. Chelsea to implode. Spurs and Arsenal should just announce that they want to sign a player, float an absurd fee and then just wait for Boehly to swoop in and pay an even higher fee. Could bankrupt Chelsea within a few years! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 Chelsea playing like you'd have thought this lineup would play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cizzler Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 5 minutes ago, Genie said: That’s the weakest Chelsea side I’ve seen in a long time That is pretty much a second XI - and is still easily a mid-table team. Their team that is injured/suspended: Mendy Chillwell - Fofana - James Pulisic - RLC - Kante - Zakaria - Sterling Joao Felix - Broja (with Mudryk to come too) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thug Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 I know the idea behind the long contracts and ffp… but imagine Mudryk doesn’t work out and they’re paying 8.5 years of some ridiculous wage? Would love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel Posted January 15, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted January 15, 2023 How is it possible that they are paying these prices yet still cruising through ffp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommo_b Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 They probably think they are being really smart by offering these mammoth length contracts, arrogant clearings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 21 hours ago, tomav84 said: arsenal spend months negotiating then chelsea swoop in with a better offer and get the deal wrapped up. that's pretty funny to be fair arsenal have a real chance to win the league and miss out on their top target because they want to save a few mil, forgetting that other clubs also have money. very silly Are you certain it’s Arsenal being silly here 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giro Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 Eight and a half year contract is absolutely hilarious, this is surely gonna end in tears 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwi1890 Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 3 hours ago, Tomaszk said: Instead of City having to pay Sterling about £20m to be an underperforming, regressing player who barely contributed... Chelsea gave them £30m AND took that contract off their hands. Obscene signing. The gave the just shy of £50m for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwi1890 Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 25 minutes ago, sne said: I was so certain Sterling would end up at Newcastle when he left City, obviously I was wrong there. Maybe this time? Nah Newcastle are to smart for that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sne Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 1 minute ago, gwi1890 said: Nah Newcastle are to smart for that Yes, sadly that's probably true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 21 minutes ago, Cizzler said: That is pretty much a second XI - and is still easily a mid-table team. Their team that is injured/suspended: Mendy Chillwell - Fofana - James Pulisic - RLC - Kante - Zakaria - Sterling Joao Felix - Broja (with Mudryk to come too) True, still doesn’t change the fact that todays lineup is their weakest for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeepDish Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 Chelsea is probably spreading the signing fees over the contract lenght. A proper piss in the pants to keep warm tactic that will backfire when they have to ged rid of non performing players with high wages and not being capable of fetching book value on the players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 18 minutes ago, Nigel said: How is it possible that they are paying these prices yet still cruising through ffp? Apparently there is some rule that when you have new owners the slate starts clean. Not sure if that’s 100% accurate though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts