Jump to content

Moussa Diaby


Delphinho123

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Demitri_C said:

You imagine if this is true and its 43m our summer budget has been depleted 

Guessing we would need to start selling some players before anymore come in

It won’t be ‘depleted’ we’ve spent it on an excellent player. That’s what the money is for, no point having a transfer fund and not spending it on footballers that improve us… 

 

 

Edited by alreadyexists
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, villa89 said:

We aren't going to try to compete with the Saudi offer in terms of wages. It's not possible to even get close. 

I'm not sure what's so complicated for people, we agreed personal terms with him and took a while to agree a fee with Leverkusen. Al nassir also agreed a contract with him and were in the process of agreeing a fee with Leverkusen but in the end it looks like he has chosen to move to us. 

So you think our offer to him hasn't been improved since the bid from Saudi? If that's not too complicated a question for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The_Steve said:

Romano will squeeze as much juice as he can. He tries to turn transfer updates into bigger sagas when most of the time they aren’t. Look how many tweets he did about Pau. 

Do you have the link to the mainstream media news story that verifies the deal? Would love to see that. Seriously, I seem to have missed it this morning. This is the closest "latest" I've seen:

Quote

The Premier League club has agreed in principle on a change with the Werkself. There is a transfer fee of 50 million euros plus bonus payments. Saudi club Al-Nassr had also campaigned intensively for the French until recently.

 

Edited by Marka Ragnos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, CVByrne said:

I think it was probably Leverkusen who courted them to help get our bid up. It could have been Diaby's agent to get a revised offer from us though. We'll never know

Martin O'Neil would have publicly refused to be held to ransom and then pay twice the agreed fee.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do people think we should put this transfer on hold whilst we check to make sure we are within FFP? I’d hate to be outside of it, not sure anybody at the club has checked or indeed confirmed this? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tayls said:

So do people think we should put this transfer on hold whilst we check to make sure we are within FFP? I’d hate to be outside of it, not sure anybody at the club has checked or indeed confirmed this? 

Monchi's asking ChatGPT what FFP is as we speak...

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tayls said:

So do people think we should put this transfer on hold whilst we check to make sure we are within FFP? I’d hate to be outside of it, not sure anybody at the club has checked or indeed confirmed this? 

Ask Gregg Evans

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tayls said:

So do people think we should put this transfer on hold whilst we check to make sure we are within FFP? I’d hate to be outside of it, not sure anybody at the club has checked or indeed confirmed this? 

Gregg Evans:

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7sh00xfkq7zuneysdyd

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tayls said:

So do people think we should put this transfer on hold whilst we check to make sure we are within FFP? I’d hate to be outside of it, not sure anybody at the club has checked or indeed confirmed this? 

Man City ain't been checking FFP for years mate and they've done alright. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tayls said:

So do people think we should put this transfer on hold whilst we check to make sure we are within FFP? I’d hate to be outside of it, not sure anybody at the club has checked or indeed confirmed this? 

spacer.png

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â